It's neither chaotic nor left wing. Can I remind you that the IMF has just rebuked Kwarteng for precisely what I am accusing him of. Do you think the IMF are chaotic and left wing?Stumuz2 wrote: ↑29 Sep 2022, 18:02.UndercoverElephant wrote: ↑29 Sep 2022, 17:37
And you continue to ignore the elephant in the room, which is that the only reason the pension companies got margin calls was because the pound was crashing, and the reason the pound was crashing was the government has recklessly promised a massive tax cut, mainly for the very rich.
You can refuse to acknowledge the root cause all day, but that won't stop it being the root cause. If the pound had been crashing because of reasons out of the government's control, or because there was some pressing, morally-defensible reason for what they were doing, then maybe you'd have a point, but neither is true. The government caused this situation to occur, and it did so in order to benefit the very rich.
Truss and Kwarteng: "The solution is to cut taxes, especially for rich people. Now, what is the problem?"
Chaotic thinking coupled with left wing ideology. A potent brew.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-63056417
A sterling slump starting during a budgetary statement is the great terror the Treasury always fears, but never actually happens. Until now.
But even I was taken aback by the interjection of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in its direct, uncompromising, unflinching and somewhat humiliating criticism of the government's fiscal plan.
Not only did the world's most important international financial institution suggest the plan was economically risky, it said it was likely to increase inequality and recommended taking an "early opportunity" for a re-evaluation of the policies in the coming weeks, on a specific date.