biffvernon wrote:stevecook172001 wrote: it may be reasonable to speculate that open pool evaporation is not being done for political rather than technical reasons.
It may be reasonable to speculate thus but the possibility that there is a technical reason remains open, despite your not having found it.
To whose possible political advantage is it to make a very bad situation worse?
Oh, yes, I accept it is entirely possible there is a purely technical reason. But, politics has a very irrational effect on many otherwise technically straightforward phenomena. Not least in the something like the nuclear industry with all of the irrational hysteria surrounding it for so many years.
I suppose I should repeat here, as it will not be clear to anyone reading this forum for the first time, I am actually anti-nuclear power, but just not for the obvious and, often (though not always), trivial reasons.
As for whose advantage it serves, you must remember, political advantage, particularly in a democracy, is not a very long game. There is also the US to consider. The USA has a number of reactors based on precisely the Fukishima one. It is therefore in a lot of powerful player's interests that everything
looks like it is under technological control in a way that
never looks like a partial retreat/concession. Which something like evaporation pools would arguably be. Or, at least, some influential anti nuclear campaign organisations would seek to make it out to be. They would basically have a field day.