Why bees matter

Discussion of the latest Peak Oil news (please also check the Website News area below)

Moderator: Peak Moderation

Post Reply
User avatar
Adam1
Posts: 2707
Joined: 01 Sep 2006, 13:49

Why bees matter

Post by Adam1 »

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... .pollution

Another boondoggle...
Alison Benjamin in last Thursday's Guardian wrote:The decline of bees won't just affect honey production – they're as important as the sun and rain in making crops grow

Britain's honeybees have suffered catastrophic losses this year according to the first survey of UK beekeepers. Close on one in three hives failed to make it through this winter and spring – that's about 80,000 colonies – leaving us with a potential crisis on our hands. Fewer honeybees will, as you'd expect, mean less honey. But as British honey only accounts for around 10% of the honey we consume in the UK, we should still be able to spread the sweet stuff on our toast well after the indigenous varieties run out, albeit at a higher price, as droughts in Argentina and the conversion of land for biofuel production reduce global supply.

More worryingly, insects pollinate a third of everything we humans eat – most fruits and vegetables, nuts, seeds, and forage for our livestock. As we become more and more dependent on a monoculture system of growing food, we become more reliant on the honeybee to do the bulk of this work; trucked into an area for just a few days or weeks when a single crop is blossoming, they can be moved in their hives to more fertile pastures when the orchards and fields turn into a barren wasteland. Not so the bumblebees, solitary bees, moths and butterflies who have suffered a sharp decline as a result of modern farming practices.

US farmers have already warned Congress that they are being forced to reduce their acreage of crops because of a shortage of honeybees for pollination and the subsequent rising cost of renting hives. Colony collapse disorder (CCD), the term used to describe the mysterious wipeout of more than a third of US honeybees – a million this year, 800,000 the year before – has not yet been confirmed in Britain.

Wet weather, the varroa mite and inappropriate controls to reduce the parasite are being blamed for our bee decline.

Whatever the causes, how long before the yields from British apple orchards are affected?

We could just import more food, but with honeybees dying on a similar scale around the world, our global food production is far from secure. Better to find the culprit. But that entails spending more money on research, something the UK government seems loath to do as made clear by its response to a petition backing the British Beekeepers' Association (BBKA) call for £8m over five years to "fund scientific research into maintaining UK bee stocks".

But measures could be put in put in place now that don't cost anything, most importantly tighter pesticide controls. EU agriculture ministers have backed proposals for more stringent safety tests on pesticides including extra safeguards to ensure chemicals are not toxic to bees. Britain was one of the few countries that abstained from agreeing to this plan despite current tests being woefully inadequate for protecting honeybee colonies. Researchers have found that widely used pesticides can interfere with honeybees' sophisticated communication systems and impair memory. They have not been ruled out as one of the factors contributing to CCD in the US. British farmers warn that tighter controls could destroy their crop production – a view not shared by their European counterparts. Although the National Farmer's Union supports the BBKA's campaign for more government funding of bee research, it would do better to throw its weight behind stricter pesticide testing. The very chemicals it wants to save could be the ones aiding the destruction of honeybees which we need as much as the sun and rain to make their crops – and our food – grow.
User avatar
Catweazle
Posts: 3388
Joined: 17 Feb 2008, 12:04
Location: Petite Bourgeois, over the hills

Post by Catweazle »

One way forward is to set up more static resources for Bees instead of using the travelling hives. I'm talking to the Forestry Commission about installing some nesting materials in my woods for Red Mason Bees, which are abundant there. Once they have laid their offspring, sealed into their tunnels, we will move the whole lot to the FCs orchard nearby and leave them there permanently.

Currently I'm looking into making wooden frames packed with clay with the correct sized holes pushed in whilst the clay is wet. Another option is a solid piece of wood with holes drilled to simulate the insect bore-holes that they often use.

All this is assuming that the FC etymologists get their finger out and approve it, if not I'll approach some independent orchard owners.
omnicans
Posts: 15
Joined: 16 Aug 2008, 21:57

Post by omnicans »

The decline of Bees is worrying indeed. I was fortunate(i think!) last summer when bees decided to makea hive in my compost bin, a bit scary at first as i had to walk through a cloud of bees to get up my garden path, and i did have concerns about my daughter playing in the garden but i soon realised that they were not interested in us at all. It felt a real honour and they survived all the way through last winter then vanished in February. WHich was great casue i spent my birthday scooping honey straight out the hive...mmmmm :D
Aurora

Post by Aurora »

It seems that some recently approved pesticides may be to blame for the recent increase in CCD:

http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/aug2008 ... 19-092.asp

:evil:
User avatar
SunnyJim
Posts: 2915
Joined: 24 Jan 2007, 10:07

Post by SunnyJim »

What? Spraying insecticides on our land kills insects??? It can't bee (sorry bad pun in poor taste).

Obviously the developers of such insecticides who stand to profit imensely from such products can be trusted to test them objectively and I'm sure their motives are lead by morals rather than profit. :twisted: :twisted:

The stupidity of what we do to our land never ceases to amaze me!

You know, based on the evidence, we are the least intelligent creature on the planet. Our intelligence is a micro-intelligence that has evolved to help us wheedle a grub from a log, and manipulate our direct surrounding. We evolved to manipulate and move on. The problem is we have now grown to fill the planet. When we have manipulated our local environment (against it's natural rules, hence killed it), there will be no other new territory left to move to. We don't seem to be able to adapt quickly enough to this concept. The concept that we have to live in balance, and surrender ourselves to nature again, rather than rule it. The concept that there is no-where left to go.... we can't develop our macro or pan-intelligence. Maybe it will take another few billion years to develop a pan-intelligent creature, and what would it's function be? Our intelligence is good for manipulating our environment to our own ends, but to live in harmony with the planet, maybe a limited intelligence is best. Does the planet really need a 'steward' like mankind aboard?

"Mankind has walked across the earth and left desert in his footprints....."
Last edited by SunnyJim on 21 Aug 2008, 09:32, edited 1 time in total.
Jim

For every complex problem, there is a simple answer, and it's wrong.

"Heaven and earth are ruthless, and treat the myriad creatures as straw dogs" (Lao Tzu V.i).
User avatar
pablo
Posts: 46
Joined: 08 Jan 2008, 22:53
Location: bristol

Post by pablo »

It's like 'Silent Spring' was never written.
Blue Peter
Posts: 1939
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Milton Keynes

Post by Blue Peter »

Catweazle wrote:Currently I'm looking into making wooden frames packed with clay with the correct sized holes pushed in whilst the clay is wet. Another option is a solid piece of wood with holes drilled to simulate the insect bore-holes that they often use.
What's the diameter of the correct sized holes?


Peter.
Does anyone know where the love of God goes when the waves turn the seconds to hours?
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14814
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

Blue Peter wrote:
Catweazle wrote:Currently I'm looking into making wooden frames packed with clay with the correct sized holes pushed in whilst the clay is wet. Another option is a solid piece of wood with holes drilled to simulate the insect bore-holes that they often use.
What's the diameter of the correct sized holes?


Peter.
We have a similar (bought) device using various diameter hollowed-out bamboos, for lacewings etc. The diameters range from two mill up to about nine.

We're currently building an insect 'hotel' a reasonable distance from the house - basically six pallets on top of each other. As we acquire suitable materials, we're filling in the gaps in the pallets. A few bricks (the ones with the holes in), some straw, some reeds, some broken bamboo canes, even a sponge. Anything with accessible spaces from a mill up to about ten mill. Creatures adapt.

Put a few plant pots on top with trailing plants and it'll look quite attractive.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
User avatar
Catweazle
Posts: 3388
Joined: 17 Feb 2008, 12:04
Location: Petite Bourgeois, over the hills

Post by Catweazle »

The mason bees are naturally using holes the diameter of a pencil, commercially available nests look slightly larger. In my woods they like South facing clay in the roots of windblown trees.
Post Reply