Submit Your UK Growth Idea And Win £10,000

Forum for general discussion of Peak Oil / Oil depletion; also covering related subjects

Moderator: Peak Moderation

User avatar
JohnB
Posts: 6456
Joined: 22 May 2006, 17:42
Location: Beautiful sunny West Wales!

Submit Your UK Growth Idea And Win £10,000

Post by JohnB »

Do you have a good idea to boost growth in the UK? Share
it with us and if your idea is the best you’ll win £10,000!

Lawrence Tomlinson, Serial Entrepreneur in Residence at
the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, is giving
away his £10,000 salary to whoever submits the best growth
idea. He wants to hear your innovative ideas, big or small, on
what practical steps the Government could take to generate
growth.
http://www.lntgroup.co.uk/competition

I could do with £10k to get a social enterprise off the ground, but pointing out that on a finite planet infinite growth isn't possible, and we'd better learn to live without growth, probably wouldn't win it for me :D.
John

Eco-Hamlets UK - Small sustainable neighbourhoods
woodburner
Posts: 4124
Joined: 06 Apr 2009, 22:45

Post by woodburner »

Start a war, that will provide a huge boost to growth.

Remove flood defences.

Leave doors and windows open, that will mean people will spend loads on fuel.
To become an extremist, hang around with people you agree with. Cass Sunstein
User avatar
RenewableCandy
Posts: 12777
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
Location: York

Post by RenewableCandy »

The Kenneal - lagger insulationfest should win this by a mile!

Of course, once we are all wrapped up, and with our energy coming in for (almost) free, the "economy" will collapse because we won't be spending oodles of money on energy any more :twisted:
Soyez réaliste. Demandez l'impossible.
Stories
The Price of Time
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

What do you have to do to get a job as Serial Entrepreneur in Residence at
the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. My careers teacher never told me about that one.
User avatar
Mean Mr Mustard
Posts: 1555
Joined: 31 Dec 2006, 12:14
Location: Cambridgeshire

Post by Mean Mr Mustard »

biffvernon wrote:What do you have to do to get a job as Serial Entrepreneur in Residence at
the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. My careers teacher never told me about that one.
Yeah but it's only a £10k salary - not much above minimum wage and what with the hellish commute into Whitehall every day...
1855 Advertisement for Kier's Rock Oil -
"Hurry, before this wonderful product is depleted from Nature’s laboratory."

The Future's so Bright, I gotta wear Night Vision Goggles...
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin
Posts: 14287
Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Contact:

Post by kenneal - lagger »

RenewableCandy wrote:The Kenneal - lagger insulationfest should win this by a mile!

Of course, once we are all wrapped up, and with our energy coming in for (almost) free, the "economy" will collapse because we won't be spending oodles of money on energy any more :twisted:
You would have to wait about 40 years for that to happen, Candy, maybe fifty. There are 25 million houses to insulate and quite a few industrial buildings as well. The houses alone require an average 625,000 units per year to be insulated and, as we have a problem building even 200,000 houses per year, insulating that number could give us a problem. Given a standard distribution curve for the uptake of the insulation that equates to about 2.5 or 3 million per year at peak! We still need the 200K houses as well!
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin
Posts: 14287
Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Contact:

Post by kenneal - lagger »

My entry
The building industry has traditionally led the country out of recession. Let it do so again. The problem we have now is that people are losing spending power to commodity price inflation while wages are static or even decreasing. Those same people are also maxed out on credit, unsure about their jobs and so aren't spending. Banks aren't lending because they can see that their customers can't afford the borrowing and they are also worried about their own stability. Meanwhile people are gradually paying off their debts so the money supply is decreasing.

Because banks have been splashing money about for decades house prices, mortgages and private rents have shot up and become such a large portion of our spending that most people don't have money left to spend in the general economy. This applies especially to the young, who would normally spend a large proportion of their income, to a much greater extent than to the older generation who have paid off their mortgages. Because of low interest rates on savings the older generation don't have much spending power either.

Energy prices have rocketed because of increasing worldwide demand and geological supply constraints: the world is running out of cheap oil and gas. The shale gas, at which the government is clutching, is only becoming viable because of the high prices of gas worldwide. It cannot make a difference to current gas prices because the cost of production is so high. After all, the Chancellor is having to give the shale gas companies a tax subsidy to get them to look for the stuff.

Something must be done to reduce people's fixed payments without creating a run on the banks by reducing house prices at too fast a rate. Something must also be done to increase the money supply to ordinary people. It's ordinary people who spend the money on goods which are bought and sold to create growth in the economy.

The government must step in to provide the money but this can't, and shouldn't, be done by borrowing because the government is also maxed out on debt. This money should be created by the government printing the money itself. This is no different to the way the banks create money except that the government won't have to pay interest on it. If you don't fully understand how new money is created look at the Positive Money website (http://www.positivemoney.org/how-money- ... ate-money/)

Now for how to get the economy going. Ditch the Green Deal and initiate a national insulation scheme instead, with houses insulated to PassivHaus/Zero carbon insulation levels (an 80% fuel saving approx), paid for by printing the money. There would be 200K to 300K jobs in this in the installation alone plus those in design, training and the insulation industry. By starting on Housing Association houses first a high level of take up would be gained and early eradication of fuel poverty would be achieved.

This measure would save each house holder about 80% of their fuel bills and would eradicate fuel poverty. Some households, which are currently fuel poor, would not make the 80% saving but would save some and take the rest as increased comfort. That saving would then be available for spending in the general economy to boost growth. Eventually the nation would save 80% of the 40% of the energy that we use in buildings, that is a 32% saving on the national energy bill. This would come off the balance of payments deficit and help with reducing the national debt.

The government should also build or purchase from house builders large numbers of highly insulated houses for rental instead of for sale, again financed by printing money. This would get building going, solve the housing crisis, reduce the cost of private rents, reduce the level of housing benefit payments and would gradually reduce or stabilise the price of houses. Over time this would make house prices affordable to all people in the UK and permanently reduce the proportion of income spent outside the general economy.
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
User avatar
PS_RalphW
Posts: 6974
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Cambridge

Post by PS_RalphW »

I have just spent (exchanged contracts) on the most expensive purchase I will ever make, short of hyper inflation. To insulate it to a decent standard would take at most 5% of the purchase price, which is the amount I knocked the asking price down by.

Previous owners haven't bothered because the heating bills were lose change to them, and they spent most of the winters holidaying abroad.

Unfortunately, a 17th C thatched listed cottage will never reach passivehaus standards.
Tarrel
Posts: 2466
Joined: 29 Nov 2011, 22:32
Location: Ross-shire, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Tarrel »

kenneal - lagger wrote:My entry
The building industry has traditionally led the country out of recession. Let it do so again. The problem we have now is that people are losing spending power to commodity price inflation while wages are static or even decreasing. Those same people are also maxed out on credit, unsure about their jobs and so aren't spending. Banks aren't lending because they can see that their customers can't afford the borrowing and they are also worried about their own stability. Meanwhile people are gradually paying off their debts so the money supply is decreasing.

Because banks have been splashing money about for decades house prices, mortgages and private rents have shot up and become such a large portion of our spending that most people don't have money left to spend in the general economy. This applies especially to the young, who would normally spend a large proportion of their income, to a much greater extent than to the older generation who have paid off their mortgages. Because of low interest rates on savings the older generation don't have much spending power either.

Energy prices have rocketed because of increasing worldwide demand and geological supply constraints: the world is running out of cheap oil and gas. The shale gas, at which the government is clutching, is only becoming viable because of the high prices of gas worldwide. It cannot make a difference to current gas prices because the cost of production is so high. After all, the Chancellor is having to give the shale gas companies a tax subsidy to get them to look for the stuff.

Something must be done to reduce people's fixed payments without creating a run on the banks by reducing house prices at too fast a rate. Something must also be done to increase the money supply to ordinary people. It's ordinary people who spend the money on goods which are bought and sold to create growth in the economy.

The government must step in to provide the money but this can't, and shouldn't, be done by borrowing because the government is also maxed out on debt. This money should be created by the government printing the money itself. This is no different to the way the banks create money except that the government won't have to pay interest on it. If you don't fully understand how new money is created look at the Positive Money website (http://www.positivemoney.org/how-money- ... ate-money/)

Now for how to get the economy going. Ditch the Green Deal and initiate a national insulation scheme instead, with houses insulated to PassivHaus/Zero carbon insulation levels (an 80% fuel saving approx), paid for by printing the money. There would be 200K to 300K jobs in this in the installation alone plus those in design, training and the insulation industry. By starting on Housing Association houses first a high level of take up would be gained and early eradication of fuel poverty would be achieved.

This measure would save each house holder about 80% of their fuel bills and would eradicate fuel poverty. Some households, which are currently fuel poor, would not make the 80% saving but would save some and take the rest as increased comfort. That saving would then be available for spending in the general economy to boost growth. Eventually the nation would save 80% of the 40% of the energy that we use in buildings, that is a 32% saving on the national energy bill. This would come off the balance of payments deficit and help with reducing the national debt.

The government should also build or purchase from house builders large numbers of highly insulated houses for rental instead of for sale, again financed by printing money. This would get building going, solve the housing crisis, reduce the cost of private rents, reduce the level of housing benefit payments and would gradually reduce or stabilise the price of houses. Over time this would make house prices affordable to all people in the UK and permanently reduce the proportion of income spent outside the general economy.
Yes, but think of the negative impact on GDP of all that energy that the utility companies won't be selling. A break-even proposal at best. And how is it going to help the sponsor's multiple interests in care homes and motor sport? Why not come up with an idea for the next "must-have" gadget instead? Get people out of their draughty houses, into their cars and down to the shopping malls, so they can spend, spend, spend!


:D

ETA: Ken, what are you going to do with the 10 grand when you win?
Engage in geo-engineering. Plant a tree today.
User avatar
JohnB
Posts: 6456
Joined: 22 May 2006, 17:42
Location: Beautiful sunny West Wales!

Post by JohnB »

Tarrel wrote:Yes, but think of the negative impact on GDP of all that energy that the utility companies won't be selling. A break-even proposal at best. And how is it going to help the sponsor's multiple interests in care homes and motor sport? Why not come up with an idea for the next "must-have" gadget instead? Get people out of their draughty houses, into their cars and down to the shopping malls, so they can spend, spend, spend!
With TPTB's apparent lack of understanding of the impossibility of unlimited growth, they may not realise it would lead to lower/negative growth :D.
John

Eco-Hamlets UK - Small sustainable neighbourhoods
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin
Posts: 14287
Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Contact:

Post by kenneal - lagger »

Tarrel wrote:ETA: Ken, what are you going to do with the 10 grand when you win?
Put it towards a solar conservatory or maybe build a swimming pond and put the rest toward the conservatory.
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
Blue Peter
Posts: 1939
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Milton Keynes

Post by Blue Peter »

kenneal - lagger wrote:
Tarrel wrote:ETA: Ken, what are you going to do with the 10 grand when you win?
Put it towards a solar conservatory or maybe build a swimming pond and put the rest toward the conservatory.
What's a solar conservatory (as opposed to just a conservatory)?


Peter.
Does anyone know where the love of God goes when the waves turn the seconds to hours?
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

One that didn't get built on the shady side of the house.
User avatar
JohnB
Posts: 6456
Joined: 22 May 2006, 17:42
Location: Beautiful sunny West Wales!

Post by JohnB »

biffvernon wrote:One that didn't get built on the shady side of the house.
That's a crazy idea. It could overheat when the sun is shining and the central heating is on :lol:.
Last edited by JohnB on 17 Aug 2013, 19:46, edited 1 time in total.
John

Eco-Hamlets UK - Small sustainable neighbourhoods
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin
Posts: 14287
Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Contact:

Post by kenneal - lagger »

Doesn't everyone have central heating in their conservatories? How would you use them in the winter? :D :shock: :twisted:
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
Post Reply