Massive Coal Sludge Spill Spreading in Tennessee

Discussion of the latest Peak Oil news (please also check the Website News area below)

Moderator: Peak Moderation

chrisc
Posts: 113
Joined: 11 Sep 2008, 22:57

Massive Coal Sludge Spill Spreading in Tennessee

Post by chrisc »

About 40 miles west of Knoxville, Tennessee, millions of gallons of ashy sludge have broken through a dike at a coal-fired power plant, flooding homes, burying roads, and threatening rivers and drinking water. Tom Kilgore is the president of the Tennessee Valley Authority, which owns the power plant: "I fully suspect that the amount of rain we've had in the last eight to 10 days, plus the freezing weather might have had something to do with this."

The holding pond contained about 70 acres of fly ash – that's the residue left over from burning coal. It often has elevated levels of toxic metals. And according to the EPA, the spill has released about 525 million gallons of the sludge – that's nearly 50 times the size of the Exxon Valdez oil spill.

http://www.fsrn.org/audio/dec-23-2008/m ... essee/3851
Photos: http://www.knoxnews.com/photos/gallerie ... nd-breach/

Image
Image
Image

Audio: http://flashpoints.net/index.html#2008-12-23
MisterE
Posts: 766
Joined: 09 Jul 2006, 19:00

Post by MisterE »

"I fully suspect that the amount of rain we've had in the last eight to 10 days, plus the freezing weather might have had something to do with this."
More like your sh*t engineering. Shocking, what a mess!
"I'd put my money on the sun and solar energy. What a source of power! I hope we don't have to wait until oil and coal run out before we tackle that." — Thomas Edison, 1931
User avatar
JohnB
Posts: 6456
Joined: 22 May 2006, 17:42
Location: Beautiful sunny West Wales!

Post by JohnB »

I guess that's the price to be paid for cheap energy :evil:
John

Eco-Hamlets UK - Small sustainable neighbourhoods
User avatar
Andy Hunt
Posts: 6760
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Bury, Lancashire, UK

Post by Andy Hunt »

Wow . . . this is the stuff that's normally hidden away from people, they don't see the toxic by-products of coal fired power.

What a mess.
Andy Hunt
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
Eternal Sunshine wrote: I wouldn't want to worry you with the truth. :roll:
JonB
Posts: 420
Joined: 21 Jun 2007, 22:04
Location: Rugby

Post by JonB »

Why didn't the turn into breeze blocks / road materials like in the UK?
I suppose all US houses are mostly timberframe?
User avatar
DominicJ
Posts: 4387
Joined: 18 Nov 2008, 14:34
Location: NW UK

Post by DominicJ »

Why didn't the turn into breeze blocks / road materials like in the UK?
I think its classed as hazardous waste by the EPA, so cant really be anythinged.
I'm a realist, not a hippie
IanG
Posts: 263
Joined: 23 Jan 2008, 14:22
Contact:

Post by IanG »

DominicJ wrote:[ I think its classed as hazardous waste by the EPA, so cant really be anythinged.
not sure thats true
Even as the authority played down the risks, the spill reignited a debate over whether the federal government should regulate coal ash as a hazardous material
From http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/25/us/25 ... sq=&st=nyt
Director
Renewable Energy Services
www.My-Power.co.uk
IanG
Posts: 263
Joined: 23 Jan 2008, 14:22
Contact:

Post by IanG »

30 pieces of heavy machinery had been put in use to begin the cleanup of the estimated 1.7 million cubic yards of ash that spilled from the 80-acre pond, and that work would continue day and night, even on Christmas
I liked the comment that they were going to work on xmas day on the clean up,....

1.7 billion gallons of the stuff......

Think that might take a while :shock:

Amazing to think that, "build a large pond and dump it there" was a permanent solution.
Director
Renewable Energy Services
www.My-Power.co.uk
chrisc
Posts: 113
Joined: 11 Sep 2008, 22:57

Toxic coal ash piling up in ponds in 32 states

Post by chrisc »

WASHINGTON – Millions of tons of toxic coal ash is piling up in power plant ponds in 32 states, a practice the federal government has long recognized as a risk to human health and the environment but has left unregulated.

An Associated Press analysis of the most recent Energy Department data found that 156 coal-fired power plants store ash in surface ponds similar to the one that collapsed last month in Tennessee.

...

The AP's analysis found that in 2005, the most recent year data is available, 721 power plants generating at least 100 megawatts of electricity produced 95.8 million tons of coal ash. About 20 percent — or nearly 20 million tons — ended up in surface ponds. The remainder ends up in landfills, or is sold for use in concrete, among other uses.

The Environmental Protection Agency eight years ago said it wanted to set a national standard for ponds or landfills used to dispose of wastes produced from burning coal.

The agency has yet to act.

As a result, coal ash ponds are subject to less regulation than landfills accepting household trash. The EPA estimates that about 300 ponds for coal ash exist nationwide. And the power industry estimates that the ponds contain tens of thousands of pounds of toxic heavy metals.

Without federal guidelines, regulations of the ash ponds vary by state. Most lack liners and have no monitors to ensure that ash and its contents don't seep into underground aquifers.

"There has been zero done by the EPA," said Rep. Nick Rahall, D-W. Va., chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee. Rahall pushed through legislation in 1980 directing the EPA to study how wastes generated at the nation's coal-fired power plants should be treated under federal law.

In both 1988 and 1993, the EPA decided that coal ash should not be regulated as a hazardous waste. The agency has declined to take other steps to control how it is stored or used.

...

Over the years, the government has found increasing evidence that coal ash ponds and landfills taint the environment and pose risks to humans and wildlife. In 2000, when the EPA first floated the idea of a national standard, the agency knew of 11 cases of water pollution linked to ash ponds or landfills. In 2007, that list grew to 24 cases in 13 states with another 43 cases where coal ash was the likely cause of pollution.

The leaks and spills are blamed for abnormalities in tadpoles. The heads and fins of certain fish species were deformed after exposure to the chemicals. In 2006, the EPA concluded that disposal of coal waste in ponds elevates cancer risk when metals leach into drinking water sources.

Among the facilities listed by the EPA as potentially causing environmental damage were three run by the Tennessee Valley Authority, the same utility that operates the pond in Tennessee that failed last month.

...

In North Carolina, where 14 power plants disposed of 1.3 million tons in ponds in 2005, state officials do not require operators to line their ponds or monitor groundwater, safety measures that help protect water supplies from contamination.

Similar safety measures are not required in Kentucky, Alabama, and Indiana.

And while other states like Ohio have regulations to protect groundwater, those often don't apply to many of the older dumps built before the state rules were imposed.

...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090109/ap_ ... t/coal_ash
IanG
Posts: 263
Joined: 23 Jan 2008, 14:22
Contact:

Post by IanG »

JonB wrote:Why didn't the turn into breeze blocks / road materials like in the UK?
I suppose all US houses are mostly timberframe?
It appears they try to, theres just too much of the stuff
The AP's analysis found that in 2005, the most recent year data is available, 721 power plants generating at least 100 megawatts of electricity produced 95.8 million tons of coal ash. About 20 percent — or nearly 20 million tons — ended up in surface ponds. The remainder ends up in landfills, or is sold for use in concrete, among other uses.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090109/ap_ ... t/coal_ash
Director
Renewable Energy Services
www.My-Power.co.uk
IanG
Posts: 263
Joined: 23 Jan 2008, 14:22
Contact:

Post by IanG »

$825 billion to clean it up.... :shock: Ooops did I say Billion , I of course mean million..... :lol:

Where there's muck there's brass
Director
Renewable Energy Services
www.My-Power.co.uk
User avatar
Billhook
Posts: 820
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: High in the Cambrian Mountains

Post by Billhook »

I suspect the price of insurance for sludge ponds must be rising rather fast as a result of this incompetence.

If the premium were at just 1% of potential damage costs, i.e. around $8 million per year,
it would be enough to affect the decommissioning date for a good fraction of coal power plants,
which in turn advances the case for their individual sale to evade "legacy" costs.

I would hope the new administration will view these toxic ash lagoons as an inalienable hazardous waste liability,
and thus avoid the costs, and the damage, being socialized.

Regards,

Billhook
User avatar
Billhook
Posts: 820
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: High in the Cambrian Mountains

Post by Billhook »

2nd post deleted
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin
Posts: 14290
Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Contact:

Post by kenneal - lagger »

IanG wrote:Amazing to think that, "build a large pond and dump it there" was a permanent solution.
Why? Works for nuclear.
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
IanG
Posts: 263
Joined: 23 Jan 2008, 14:22
Contact:

Post by IanG »

The nation's largest public utility on Friday raised its top estimate for cleaning up a massive ash spill at a Tennessee coal-fired power plant to nearly $1 billion and acknowledged the recovery could take several years
Update

Looks like the small containment pond, might have become a large containment pond....
The report said the utility has spent more than $40 million settling claims -- twice as much as reported two weeks ago. TVA has bought 71 pieces of property and resolved 30 personal property claims.
:cry:
Director
Renewable Energy Services
www.My-Power.co.uk
Post Reply