Financial Crisis

Forum for general discussion of Peak Oil / Oil depletion; also covering related subjects

Moderator: Peak Moderation

User avatar
oilslick
Posts: 672
Joined: 11 Apr 2007, 20:53

Post by oilslick »

biffvernon wrote:But only the Chancelor of the Exchequor / Prime Minister of one little nation off the west coast of Europe. The situation is global.
No offence but you seem to have been totally taken in by them.

Global my arse. Does that mean the leaders of Iceland should be let off for letting their country be ruined? Could they have done something to stop it? I'm sure they had plenty of opportunities but were doing very well from it so didn't bother.

GB, as an individual, can take more blame than any other human in this country. Had he really been prudent we would just be in big trouble but because he borrowed and lied, borrowed and lied, we now face total wipe out. Just look at that graph - all that borrowing supposedly during a boom - it was all a smoke screen so he could look good enough to hang around to be PM. He is totally evil and will do whatever it takes to try and keep power. Utter disgrace, I hope when it's all over he ends up getting locked up with TB.
User avatar
DominicJ
Posts: 4387
Joined: 18 Nov 2008, 14:34
Location: NW UK

Post by DominicJ »

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article8080.html

Theres a graph about half way down showing the real debt of the UK Government.
Sadly it doesnt go back beyond 2005, I have asked for one that does.
He's normaly quite accomadating in that respect.
I'm a realist, not a hippie
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

oilslick wrote:No offence but you seem to have been totally taken in by them.
None taken, but no, I don't think I've been taken in. Brown was working within a paradigm that required the Chancellor/PM to act as he did. Had we had a differnt Chancellor/PM from either Labour or Conservative (and probalbly Liberal too) he/she would have done something similar - just like most of the other political leaders round the world. The Dalai Lama or the King of Bhutan may have acted differently but, sadly, they weren't on the shortlist for the job.

It's just too easy to blame the incumbant PM for problems that are endemic to the way our society and its financial system are structured.

It might be better to pretend that all the problems are the fault of a goat (though not better for the goat).

Image
User avatar
oilslick
Posts: 672
Joined: 11 Apr 2007, 20:53

Post by oilslick »

biffvernon wrote:
oilslick wrote:No offence but you seem to have been totally taken in by them.
None taken, but no, I don't think I've been taken in. Brown was working within a paradigm that required the Chancellor/PM to act as he did. Had we had a differnt Chancellor/PM from either Labour or Conservative (and probalbly Liberal too) he/she would have done something similar - just like most of the other political leaders round the world. The Dalai Lama or the King of Bhutan may have acted differently but, sadly, they weren't on the shortlist for the job.

It's just too easy to blame the incumbant PM for problems that are endemic to the way our society and its financial system are structured.

It might be better to pretend that all the problems are the fault of a goat (though not better for the goat).
Oh come on...he's in charge of the government. He willfully pumped this thing up at every opportunity. I can only think you don't realise what a bad position this country particularly is in.

He was warned by people like the IMF, Vince Cable and many others and generally chose to try and ridicule them.

He is extremely dangerous. I'm not saying the Tories would have done much better but it's pretty irrelevant. If my company goes bust that's my fault unless it's because a meteor hit the building. This was all foreseeable and they should have foreseen it - I bloody did so they should have.

He spent 10 years telling how wonderful he was and how he alone was responsible for the good times...now we find out it was a fraud and it's all the Americans or the bankers fault.
User avatar
DominicJ
Posts: 4387
Joined: 18 Nov 2008, 14:34
Location: NW UK

Post by DominicJ »

It's just too easy to blame the incumbant PM for problems that are endemic to the way our society and its financial system are structured.
Thats odd, you see, Brown completely changed the structure of our financial system.
He created the FSA
The FSA has failed utterly.
When Norther Rock was going under, Brown quite literaly disappeared for three weeks and the FSA stopped answering its phones, leaving the BoE to deal with it.
The BoE had no idea what was going on, because Browns new system denied them information they used to have.

Had we had a differnt Chancellor/PM from either Labour or Conservative (and probalbly Liberal too) he/she would have done something similar - just like most of the other political leaders round the world.
Vince cable and John Redwood have been blogging for years that we are walking into a disaster, so if any of the other two had been in power, we wouldnt be here.
I'm a realist, not a hippie
chrisc
Posts: 113
Joined: 11 Sep 2008, 22:57

Tory Troll

Post by chrisc »

DominicJ wrote:Vince cable and John Redwood have been blogging for years that we are walking into a disaster, so if any of the other two had been in power, we wouldnt be here.
You are essentially a Tory Troll... :roll:
User avatar
oilslick
Posts: 672
Joined: 11 Apr 2007, 20:53

Re: Tory Troll

Post by oilslick »

chrisc wrote:
DominicJ wrote:Vince cable and John Redwood have been blogging for years that we are walking into a disaster, so if any of the other two had been in power, we wouldnt be here.
You are essentially a Tory Troll... :roll:
How do you come to that viewpoint?
snow hope
Posts: 4101
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: outside Belfast, N Ireland

Post by snow hope »

I agree generally with Oilslick and even DomincJ in this instance! :wink:

Brown sold half the UK's Gold off in the late 90s and early 2000s when it was at rock-bottom prices.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/p ... 654931.ece

He also abolished the pension tax dividend rules in 1997 that played a major part in the downfall of the UK Pension industry over the last decade.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... laims.html

Then he had the gall to tell us repeatedly in his smug manner that he had done away with Boom/Bust Britain. Huh! :evil:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/busin ... 88576.html

http://www.power-to-the-people.co.uk/20 ... tory-boom/

Just some random links from Google that confirms what that man has done! :evil:
Real money is gold and silver
User avatar
DominicJ
Posts: 4387
Joined: 18 Nov 2008, 14:34
Location: NW UK

Post by DominicJ »

ChrisC
Vince Cable is a lib dem...
I'm a realist, not a hippie
User avatar
oilslick
Posts: 672
Joined: 11 Apr 2007, 20:53

Post by oilslick »

DominicJ wrote:ChrisC
Vince Cable is a lib dem...
Lib Dem Tory Troll :lol:
User avatar
Andy Hunt
Posts: 6760
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Bury, Lancashire, UK

Post by Andy Hunt »

oilslick wrote:
DominicJ wrote:ChrisC
Vince Cable is a lib dem...
Lib Dem Tory Troll :lol:
Well that would be one way to win the next election I suppose! :lol:
Andy Hunt
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
Eternal Sunshine wrote: I wouldn't want to worry you with the truth. :roll:
RevdTess
Posts: 3054
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Glasgow

Post by RevdTess »

Now that the Tories are pledging to abolish tax on savings interest for standard rate taxpayers, I might be forced to vote for them! If my city job goes away and i take a lower paid job in something worthwhile, , an extra 20% interest on savings would be a lifeline! I've always thought it was unfair to be taxed on both my income and then on my savings interest as well.

Still I'd feel queasy voting Tory.

JohnB - the tory plans on savings would be a godsend for you! You'd probably earn £000s more a year in savings!
Last edited by RevdTess on 07 Jan 2009, 13:22, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Andy Hunt
Posts: 6760
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Bury, Lancashire, UK

Post by Andy Hunt »

Tess wrote:JohnB - the tory plans on savings would be a godsend for you! You'd probably earn £000s more a year in savings!
Interesting use of the word 'earn' . . . :lol:
Andy Hunt
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
Eternal Sunshine wrote: I wouldn't want to worry you with the truth. :roll:
User avatar
skeptik
Posts: 2969
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Costa Geriatrica, Spain

Post by skeptik »

Andy Hunt wrote:
Tess wrote:JohnB - the tory plans on savings would be a godsend for you! You'd probably earn £000s more a year in savings!
Interesting use of the word 'earn' . . . :lol:
Yes.. its what the rentier class calls 'working for a living'
:wink:
"When the facts change, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
John Maynard Keynes.
RevdTess
Posts: 3054
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Glasgow

Post by RevdTess »

Andy Hunt wrote:
Tess wrote:JohnB - the tory plans on savings would be a godsend for you! You'd probably earn £000s more a year in savings!
Interesting use of the word 'earn' . . . :lol:
Think of it as 'residual income' for work performed earlier in life. Like being a writer or a musician.

Of course there are many who are earning residual income for work performed by their ancestors rather than themselves. That's another issue.
Post Reply