Financial Crisis

Forum for general discussion of Peak Oil / Oil depletion; also covering related subjects

Moderator: Peak Moderation

User avatar
RenewableCandy
Posts: 12777
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
Location: York

Post by RenewableCandy »

(Warning: I was being sarky. There isn't a Sarky icon so I have to make do with a " :twisted: " )
Soyez réaliste. Demandez l'impossible.
Stories
The Price of Time
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

DominicJ wrote:The people who predicted this crisis are calling for a massive reduction in the size of government.

Its(sic) there(sic) conclusion, not mine.
I'm not calling for less government.
oilslick wrote:I think the laws of maths, physics and anything else you can think of are calling for a smaller government.
Did somebody re-write the laws of maths and physics while I wasn't looking?
User avatar
DominicJ
Posts: 4387
Joined: 18 Nov 2008, 14:34
Location: NW UK

Post by DominicJ »

So, did you publish any papers on it?
There were books, published in early 2000 that predicted the sequence of events accuratly and the causes, they said low interest and high government spending, the cure being sensible interest rates and small government.

http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/downc ... e=m&title=

Theres definatly a pattern there
I'm a realist, not a hippie
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

Too much private spending.
User avatar
DominicJ
Posts: 4387
Joined: 18 Nov 2008, 14:34
Location: NW UK

Post by DominicJ »

Too much private spending.
The government is responsible for 45% of spending, it will hit 60% this year.


You are partialy right, the people have overspent as well, however, they did so because the government encouraged them too, via monetary policy, and they did so to a much lesser extent than the government, and they have largely stopped, despite el gordo's pleases that they carry on regardless.
I'm a realist, not a hippie
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

DominicJ wrote:The government is responsible for 45% of spending, it will hit 60% this year.
So?
User avatar
Bandidoz
Site Admin
Posts: 2705
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Berks

Post by Bandidoz »

RenewableCandy wrote:(Warning: I was being sarky. There isn't a Sarky icon so I have to make do with a " :twisted: " )
In the world of smilies, the :P is more appropriate for sarcasm (or just general taking the pish) ;)

(OMG I've turned from the Apostrophe Police to the Emoticons Police)
Olduvai Theory (Updated) (Reviewed)
Easter Island - a warning from history : http://dieoff.org/page145.htm
User avatar
DominicJ
Posts: 4387
Joined: 18 Nov 2008, 14:34
Location: NW UK

Post by DominicJ »

The Government spends more than everyone else combined, and everyone else is guilty of spending too much.

Do you not see a flaw in that logic?
I'm a realist, not a hippie
User avatar
Andy Hunt
Posts: 6760
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Bury, Lancashire, UK

Post by Andy Hunt »

Where does the government get the money it spends?
Andy Hunt
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
Eternal Sunshine wrote: I wouldn't want to worry you with the truth. :roll:
MacG
Posts: 2863
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Scandinavia

Post by MacG »

Andy Hunt wrote:Where does the government get the it spends?
Basically trough force and fraud. Trough taxation is force, while lotteries and "deficit spending" is fraud. Very simple all of it.
User avatar
Mark
Posts: 2522
Joined: 13 Dec 2007, 08:48
Location: NW England

Post by Mark »

Does Alastair Darling wake up on Christmas morning to find enough for the year in his stocking ?

Either that, or else he goes out and gets it printed........
User avatar
Andy Hunt
Posts: 6760
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Bury, Lancashire, UK

Post by Andy Hunt »

I suppose I was getting at things like

- VAT
- income tax

If we didn't spend anything, people wouldn't be employed and therefore wouldn't have an income to tax, and there would be no VAT.

What government spends is a function of what people spend. That's why in a recession, government has to borrow to finance whatever programmes it wants to fund. Because nobody is spending anything.

But when what the private sector is spending has been borrowed in the first place rather than earned, then government tax revenue is based on consumer debt rather than the real economy.

So government assumptions that government borrowing will eventually be repaid could be wrong, because previous tax revenue turned out to be little more than a money laundering operation.
Andy Hunt
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
Eternal Sunshine wrote: I wouldn't want to worry you with the truth. :roll:
User avatar
RenewableCandy
Posts: 12777
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
Location: York

Post by RenewableCandy »

MacG wrote:
Andy Hunt wrote:Where does the government get the it spends?
Basically trough force
:lol: :lol: :lol:
'Snout like a good bit of extortion!
Soyez réaliste. Demandez l'impossible.
Stories
The Price of Time
happychicken
Posts: 210
Joined: 23 Oct 2008, 17:51
Location: NW England

Post by happychicken »

Andy Hunt wrote:Where does the government get the money it spends?
Well when things get desperate it just prints some and then calls it "quantitative easing" :wink:
Believe in the future - Back to Nature
User avatar
oilslick
Posts: 672
Joined: 11 Apr 2007, 20:53

Post by oilslick »

biffvernon wrote:Too much private spending.
How can you defend anything this lot have done? They've actively encouraged this debt boom, joined in themselves and pretended they were doing good things.

GB will go down in history as the person who ruined the UK. We will be paying back the debt for 30 years...if we're lucky.

We need to come up with a new plan and adjust to a much lower standard of living, not keep throwing my son's future earning's (if there are any jobs) down the plughole.
Post Reply