Current Oil Price
Moderator: Peak Moderation
Well he didn't exactly say "new all time low", did he? The context is pretty bloody obvious.
Is context-free discussion a sign of senility?
Is context-free discussion a sign of senility?
Olduvai Theory (Updated) (Reviewed)
Easter Island - a warning from history : http://dieoff.org/page145.htm
Easter Island - a warning from history : http://dieoff.org/page145.htm
Getting a rise out of a low seems to be what RGR is all about.
Andy Hunt
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
Eternal Sunshine wrote: I wouldn't want to worry you with the truth.
What a bunch of shiites!BBC News - 15/12/08
Oil prices have risen sharply, briefly topping $50 a barrel, ahead of Wednesday's meeting of the oil producers' cartel Opec.
Some members are keen to cut production by two million barrels per day to boost prices, which have slumped from a peak of $147 a barrel in July.
Opec is meeting in Oran in Algeria, having delayed a decision at an informal meeting earlier in December.
US light, sweet crude for January delivery rose $3.19 to trade at $49.47.
The price had earlier peaked at $50.05 a barrel.
Opec's biggest previous cut in production was in April 1999 when it cut production by 1,716,000 barrels per day (bpd).
'Sizeable reduction'
The cartel cut 1.5 million bpd at its last formal meeting in Vienna, Austria in October, but prices continued falling regardless, and hit a four-year-low of $40.50 a barrel on 5 December.
Prices are being depressed by falling demand for oil as the world's major economies slow and some of them go into recession.
"We have to act - we see a very sizeable reduction," Opec secretary-general Abdullah al-Badri told reporters.
Two million barrels represents about 5% of Opec production.
"Everybody is supporting a cut - I don't have any doubt about it," said Opec president Chakib Khelil.
Mr Khelil also confirmed that Opec's biggest exporter, Saudi Arabia, had already cut its own production by 8% in anticipation of the cartel's decision.
Original Article
- Totally_Baffled
- Posts: 2824
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Hampshire
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid= ... ty_futuresBen wrote:Let's assume that OPEC manage to achieve a cut in oil production and this results in a rise in the oil price; wouldn't this merely push economies worldwide deeper into recession, resulting in lower demand for oil, thereby driving the oil price back downwards?
Looks like the market thinks that even major production cuts cannot keep up with the fall in demand. Back down to $45 already.Crude Oil Falls on Concern OPEC Cuts Will Be Insufficient
Dec. 15 (Bloomberg) -- Crude oil fell, retreating from $50 a barrel in New York, on speculation that OPEC production cuts may be insufficient to bolster prices as the global recession curbs fuel consumption.
So by January looks like the world already has circa 3.0 million barrels per day of spare capacity and the recession hasnt got going yet.
Looks like it will be around 4 to 6 million by the end of next year if the global economy contracts!
Incredible how quickly things change...
TB
Peak oil? ahhh smeg.....
Peak oil? ahhh smeg.....
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
- Totally_Baffled
- Posts: 2824
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Hampshire
These is a weird one.biffvernon wrote:I suppose that if OPEC were to cut sufficiently to cause the prise to rise this would still not provide an incentive for investment in new production, since profiability would be dependant on OPEC.
If oil prices are too low for future investment, the inevitable effect on supply kicks in, and then prices rise so those investments become justified.
Surely thats how its always worked?
If oil was still $1 a barrel, then I am sure the North Sea would still be untouched along with Cantarell, the GOM etc and all those other expensive places!
TB
Peak oil? ahhh smeg.....
Peak oil? ahhh smeg.....
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
Yes, but say I've got zillion dollars to invest in oil drilling, before I spend it at the North Pole or wherever I'd look at the price of oil to see if I might expect a good return. If the price is where it is because there is a real geologically inspired shortage I might invest but if the price is fixed by Saudi turning the tap off I'd be very cautious.
- Totally_Baffled
- Posts: 2824
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Hampshire
I understand your point - and yes you would be more cautious if Saudi (and the world) has so much spare capacity that the price was too low to justify investment.biffvernon wrote:Yes, but say I've got zillion dollars to invest in oil drilling, before I spend it at the North Pole or wherever I'd look at the price of oil to see if I might expect a good return. If the price is where it is because there is a real geologically inspired shortage I might invest but if the price is fixed by Saudi turning the tap off I'd be very cautious.
But that wasn't what I was getting at.
I may have it wrong, but the impression I am getting from some posts/threads/articles is that there will be an even worse post peak shortage because of lack of investment now.
Its a fair enough point - but it isnt any different to how things have worked in the past?
In other words 15 years (1985 to 2000-ish) of sub $15 oil didnt stop us getting to 87mpd in 2008?
TB
Peak oil? ahhh smeg.....
Peak oil? ahhh smeg.....
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: 04 Jan 2008, 14:57
- Location: London EC1