Gordon Brown talks bollocks on Peak Oil

What can we do to change the minds of decision makers and people in general to actually do something about preparing for the forthcoming economic/energy crises (the ones after this one!)?

Moderator: Peak Moderation

User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

Hey don't put him off :)

Welcome, Ziggy.
Blue Peter
Posts: 1939
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Milton Keynes

Post by Blue Peter »

ziggy12345 wrote:Hi

I just joined this forum and find it rather informative. I have been a welltesting engineer for the last 28 years and have been involved in the collection of data to measure most of all the major and minor oil reservoirs in the world so have intimate knowledge of the worlds remaining oil supplies
Excellent. How far are we through the world's reserves, then?


Peter.
Does anyone know where the love of God goes when the waves turn the seconds to hours?
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14814
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

Vortex wrote:
emordnilap wrote:welcome ziggy12345

Might I respectfully suggest reviewing a few past threads and give us your opinion? Start here. :twisted:
Oh, that's cruel ... don't scare the poor chap (chapesse?) off!
All's fair. No more cruel to him than us.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
User avatar
RenewableCandy
Posts: 12777
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
Location: York

Post by RenewableCandy »

emordnilap wrote:
All's fair. ...
Does PO cound as "Love" or "War"? :twisted:
Soyez réaliste. Demandez l'impossible.
Stories
The Price of Time
RGR

Post by RGR »

ziggy12345 wrote:Hi

I just joined this forum and find it rather informative. I have been a welltesting engineer for the last 28 years and have been involved in the collection of data to measure most of all the major and minor oil reservoirs in the world so have intimate knowledge of the worlds remaining oil supplies
Last edited by RGR on 02 Aug 2011, 05:36, edited 1 time in total.
ziggy12345
Posts: 1235
Joined: 28 Nov 2008, 10:49

Post by ziggy12345 »

RGR

Yes you are correct RGR Welltesting is only one aspect but this information is critical along with volumetric methods and a suitable recovery factor in determining the recoverable reserves of a rervoir.

My experience with tight gas sands and other marginal reserves such as fractured basement rocks as in Vietnam usual end with a dry hole and the company disregarding the lease as uneconomic. This usually assumes a conventional recovery method.

Fields such as the Barnet and Bakken you talk about are very low permeability and are very discontinuous. The flow from these fields would be low even with long reach horizontal drilling and I am sure there is test data that shows this (not sure but will check). Recovery is estimated at between 2-5%

The Greenland offshore reserves you talk about are estimated at around 110 billion barrels. Usually these figures are widely exaggerated and I cant see this being an exception. So lets say there is 60 billion barrels. If you take the time for exploration and development you are looking at 5-8 years. 60 billion barrels sounds like a lot until you realise its less than 2 years world wide consumption. So its just a bump on the down slope.

I was initially trying to point out, in line with the topic, that the claims politicians make are usually based on some flawed information and inflated for some economic or political reason and the real information is almost impossible to find.

Cheers
RGR

Post by RGR »

[quote="ziggy12345"]RGR
Last edited by RGR on 02 Aug 2011, 05:36, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
PS_RalphW
Posts: 6977
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Cambridge

Post by PS_RalphW »

What this web site has lacked until now has been an industry insider who was an engineer with hard data from the work face.

This has allowed all sorts of arguments to rage where neither side had the unpoliticed evidence to back their claims.

Of course, one individual can only provide a tiny snapshot of the whole world picture, and extrapolating from their knowledge and experience could lead to dangerous generalisations.

However, I for one welcome Ziggy and hope (s)he stays around a long time.

I once knew a cat called Ziggy. As dismal an example of the feline species as it has ever been my misfortune to encounter...
eatyourveg
Posts: 1289
Joined: 15 Jul 2007, 17:02
Location: uk

Post by eatyourveg »

Hi Ziggy.
Nice to see RGR speaking to a forum member with something approaching respect.
Vortex
Posts: 6095
Joined: 16 May 2006, 19:14

Post by Vortex »

As famed cage fighters Ziggy and RGR prepare for their bout, the huge audience of PowerSwitchers goes wild ...
Image
User avatar
Andy Hunt
Posts: 6760
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Bury, Lancashire, UK

Post by Andy Hunt »

Image
Andy Hunt
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
Eternal Sunshine wrote: I wouldn't want to worry you with the truth. :roll:
RGR

Post by RGR »

RalphW wrote:What this web site has lacked until now has been an industry insider who was an engineer with hard data from the work face.
Last edited by RGR on 02 Aug 2011, 05:37, edited 1 time in total.
RGR

Post by RGR »

eatyourveg wrote:Hi Ziggy.
Nice to see RGR speaking to a forum member with something approaching respect.
Last edited by RGR on 02 Aug 2011, 05:37, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Andy Hunt
Posts: 6760
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Bury, Lancashire, UK

Post by Andy Hunt »

ziggy12345 wrote:the claims politicians make are usually based on some flawed information and inflated for some economic or political reason
They are probably getting their information from someone called 'Reserve Growth Rulz' I expect. Does exactly what it says on the tin, for a very modest fee.

Full internet propaganda campaign included in the price.
Andy Hunt
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
Eternal Sunshine wrote: I wouldn't want to worry you with the truth. :roll:
ziggy12345
Posts: 1235
Joined: 28 Nov 2008, 10:49

Post by ziggy12345 »

No I didn't graduate as a petroleum engineer but do have a pretty good understanding of the field.

From what I see here and elsewhere and why I wanted to contribute was that easily accessible information that anybody can understand is being miss interpreted and misrepresented to give people false hopes.

In my opinion we are on the early stages of the oil decline and there will be some fundamental changes in the world on a time scale shorter than people expect. There has been lots of debate on the possibilities of things happening but my feeling is that we will experience things we least expect.

I suspect people in the know already have an idea of the problems the world will encounter and are planning pre-emptive action. Iraq might have already been the first step.

The least likely scenario is that things will continue as they are. That is the most scariest thing of all.

Cheers
Last edited by ziggy12345 on 28 Nov 2008, 21:07, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply