PO gets more "mainstream"

Forum for general discussion of Peak Oil / Oil depletion; also covering related subjects

Moderator: Peak Moderation

fubar1977
Posts: 44
Joined: 03 Aug 2008, 20:18
Location: North Yorkshire

PO gets more "mainstream"

Post by fubar1977 »

Have a look at this...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2 ... -fuels-oil

It`s getting less "fringe" by the day.
The demand destruction is leading to a lack of investment in new infrastructure and exploration.
Perhaps $60ish a barrel isn`t such a good thing...

Peak oil may have been clouded by "peak money" recently but that doesn`t mean its simply gone away, as I suspect we are about to find out.
User avatar
mikepepler
Site Admin
Posts: 3096
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Rye, UK
Contact:

Post by mikepepler »

You can even get postcards with the message:
Image
From http://www.cathtatecards.com/

Apparently the message on the back is: "If we use oil the current rate, the supply of oil globally will peak in 2015 and will then rapidly run out. We will also have caused global warming."
User avatar
JohnB
Posts: 6456
Joined: 22 May 2006, 17:42
Location: Beautiful sunny West Wales!

Post by JohnB »

mikepepler wrote:From http://www.cathtatecards.com/
I like the one shown on the home page
"Things are getting worse. Please send chocolate."
John

Eco-Hamlets UK - Small sustainable neighbourhoods
User avatar
Kentucky Fried Panda
Posts: 1743
Joined: 06 Apr 2007, 13:50
Location: NW Engerland

Post by Kentucky Fried Panda »

In the new Bond flick, a UK minister sez," what would you have us do? The world's oil is running out!"
Prono 007
Posts: 291
Joined: 22 Sep 2006, 01:58
Location: Sheffield

Post by Prono 007 »

A similar article was also in the Telegraph:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/fina ... orism.html

Also there was a front page article on the FT this week on a draught of a new IEA report:

"Without extra investment to raise production, the natural annual rate of output decline is 9.1 per cent, the International Energy Agency says in its annual report, the World Energy Outlook, a draft of which has been obtained by the Financial Times."

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e5e78778-a53f ... 07658.html
Vortex
Posts: 6095
Joined: 16 May 2006, 19:14

Post by Vortex »

The agency says even with investment, the annual rate of output decline is 6.4 per cent.
6% decline rate WITH investment? 9% without?

This info should be the main headline on BBC news ...

The effect of this economic crisis could be horrific: oil declines continue, total consumption is reduced (a bit), oil industry ... and green ... investments stall ... and then later we all decide we are happy again ... OOPS ... sorry, not enough oil, and no quick way of ramping up production ... prices shoot up again .... but the economy is still at the tail end of the slump ... oh dear ...
happychicken
Posts: 210
Joined: 23 Oct 2008, 17:51
Location: NW England

Post by happychicken »

Why isn't it on the BBC News??

They all know about it at the BBC.

Probably because of the PANIC it will cause when the secret really does get out into the mainstream. The thing is there will be panic whenever people find out, although personally I think people have a right to know.

I should think the BBC aren't allowed to tell too many people about it because the thing is business can't "carry on as usual" once people know. So they've hidden it away on serious programmes on Radio 4, but they haven't announced it on the 10 o'clock news yet.

Informing people about peak oil isn't exactly good for big business - air travel, car manufacturers, agribusiness, Formula One!! etc etc so it's not good for votes either.

I suppose TPTB think the longer the cat is kept in the bag the better.
Believe in the future - Back to Nature
User avatar
Ludwig
Posts: 3849
Joined: 08 Jul 2008, 00:31
Location: Cambridgeshire

Post by Ludwig »

happychicken wrote:Why isn't it on the BBC News??

They all know about it at the BBC.

Probably because of the PANIC it will cause when the secret really does get out into the mainstream. The thing is there will be panic whenever people find out, although personally I think people have a right to know.
I don't. For a start, most people simply don't have the intellect to appreciate why "only" half the world's oil being used up means an energy crisis. If people won't understand the truth, it's often better to lie.

Secondly, what good would it do? Most people are not going to react to the announcement that civilisation is at an end in a useful way - especially in this country with a population obsessed with rights and for whiich the notions of sacrifice, duty and self-restraint are totally alien.
"We're just waiting, looking skyward as the days go down / Someone promised there'd be answers if we stayed around."
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

happychicken wrote:Why isn't it on the BBC News??
For the same reason that it wasn't on the front page of the FT. It's just not newsworthy enough - just merits inclusion on an inside page of the FT. No TPTB conspiracy needed.
fubar1977
Posts: 44
Joined: 03 Aug 2008, 20:18
Location: North Yorkshire

Post by fubar1977 »

Happychicken/Ludwig

I kind of agree with both of you in the sense that this is such a MAJOR problem that it needs mainstream acknowledgement, however, Ludwigs point is also very valid in that "what`s the point of telling people the problems when we know damn well there`s no soloution".
As long as we can all watch garbage on telly and buy tons of pointless plastic crap then everythings OK isn`t it?

NO government is going to admit the scale of the problem because governments only think in terms of The Next Election.
Fuel poverty and total economic collapse with no immediate soloution is hardly a vote winner!

Whew, rant over.
Sorry... :wink:
User avatar
Cabrone
Posts: 634
Joined: 05 Aug 2006, 09:24
Location: London

Post by Cabrone »

HappyChicken wrote:Probably because of the PANIC it will cause when the secret really does get out into the mainstream.
Maybe not so much panic as a general 'I can't be assed' attitude breaking out.

TPTB are probably scared that the populace might wake up and opt out of this broken system en masse.
The most complete exposition of a social myth comes when the myth itself is waning (Robert M MacIver 1947)
Vortex
Posts: 6095
Joined: 16 May 2006, 19:14

Post by Vortex »

I still remember Claire Durkin of the Government, at an Oil Depletion event responding to the question:
"Why don't you warn the populace what's coming?"

Her reaction roughly went: "Hey, YOU can tell them but we WON'T."
User avatar
skeptik
Posts: 2969
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Costa Geriatrica, Spain

Re: PO gets more "mainstream"

Post by skeptik »

fubar1977 wrote:.
Perhaps $60ish a barrel isn`t such a good thing...
Good for the Man on the Clapham Omnibus* in the short term. Bad for the energy industries in the longer term.

(*Note to New World people - you know him as Joe six pack)
"When the facts change, I change my opinion. What do you do, sir?"
John Maynard Keynes.
happychicken
Posts: 210
Joined: 23 Oct 2008, 17:51
Location: NW England

Post by happychicken »

Actually after reading this week's ODAC newsletter, I think Gordo is probably still in complete denial about how much oil there is and he appears to have no understanding of supply vs demand and how oil prices link to the economy. So, no, there's no conspiracy theory, just an out-of-touch PM.

He doesn't believe the UK Energy Taskforce on Peak Oil & Energy Security Report which suggests oil will peak within the next 5 years.

He still thinks the peak will come in 2030. Oh dear.

I hope he'll take more notice of the International Energy Agency's 2008 World Energy Outlook Report due out this month and maybe then he'll stop harping on about oil prices.

He obviously doesn't understand even the basics of oil production and costs. He wants the oil companies to reduce the amount they charge per barrel but he has no inkling of what this itself will do to supply. He seems to think oil can be sucked out of the ground for nothing.
Believe in the future - Back to Nature
happychicken
Posts: 210
Joined: 23 Oct 2008, 17:51
Location: NW England

Post by happychicken »

From today's MSN news page - an article by Nick Louth

http://money.uk.msn.com/investing/artic ... &GT1=63257
Believe in the future - Back to Nature
Post Reply