BBC : Energy crisis 'will be permanent'

Discussion of the latest Peak Oil news (please also check the Website News area below)

Moderator: Peak Moderation

Post Reply
Ippoippo
Posts: 255
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Bath->Tokyo->Cardiff-> Hokkaido, Japan next?

BBC : Energy crisis 'will be permanent'

Post by Ippoippo »

BBC put up two more news stories, late at night UK time on the 9th, and another one on the front page early on the 10th UK time.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4423456.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4423590.stm



Mind you, we knew this already!!
nancy
Posts: 39
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Contact:

Post by nancy »

The document says energy will inevitably become less available and more expensive than it has been for the last few decades.
I have friends who have said when this stuff is on the BBC then I might believe it....

Did they ever follow up on that vote for Peak Oil being the number one topic people voted to see/hear about?
User avatar
clv101
Site Admin
Posts: 10551
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Contact:

Post by clv101 »

No mention of oil, which for the UK I think is reasonable. Our first problem is electricity and the amount we're losing over the next few years due to nuclear decommission and North Sea gas depletion.
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

The line being pushed by the BBC Radio 4 Today Programme in its reporting of the Geological Society report, one of whose conclusions is:
Nuclear fission energy is a proven and reliable technology that will inevitably have a key role in a future clean energy mix.
More at http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/template.cfm?name=PR60
No mention that spending on nuclear will divert investment away from renewables or that there isn't enough uranium in the world to supply the world energy shortfall after PO.
User avatar
PowerSwitchJames
Posts: 934
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: London
Contact:

Post by PowerSwitchJames »

What happens when a country runs short on electricity?

Well, maybe this?
North Korea has the potential to generate about 7,800 megawatts of power, but fuel shortages have cut output to just over 2,000 megawatts. The shortage has kept more than two-thirds of its industrial facilities idle.
www.PowerSwitch.org.uk

'Being green is not what you think, it is what you do.'
newmac
Site Admin
Posts: 431
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Kennington, London

Post by newmac »

Any news on exactly when the JESS report will be published? From previous years it should be sometime in November......unless they sit on it.
"You can't be stationary on a moving train" - Howard Zinn
peaky

Post by peaky »

biffvernon wrote:
Nuclear fission energy is a proven and reliable technology that will inevitably have a key role in a future clean energy mix.
Well, in my books nuclear is clean only in that its CO2 emissions are low - as for mining, transporting, building and certainly waste and decomissioning it seems a rather elastic use of the word :?
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

There was clearly dissent on the nuclear question. The first line in the nuclear section reads:
Marked differences of opinion ? arising largely from philosophy of approach - remain over whether nuclear should be considered as an option.
but that wasn't emphasised by the BBC's reports.
User avatar
clv101
Site Admin
Posts: 10551
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Contact:

Post by clv101 »

This report in The Guardian didn't even mention nuclear! Is this a case of the Guardian selectively reporting the story so as not to encourage nuclear? Often, what people don't say is more telling than what they do say...

Sorry for the formatting, I got this on email and couldn't see it on Guardian Online.
Energy to cost more warns report
> Press Association
> Thursday November 10, 2005 1:48 PM
> Scarce and expensive energy supplies are set to become a permanent feature
> of life in the UK, leading academics predict.
> The warning comes with the publication of a new multidisciplinary report
> which the author says aims to provide the Government with a coherent
> feasible solution to problems of the country's looming energy gap.
> The document is written by John Loughead, executive director of the UK
> Energy Research Centre and follows a meeting between 150 scientific,
> technical,economic and sociological experts at Burlington House last month
> under the auspices of The Geological Society of London.
> The meeting was co-sponsored by five sister societies and institutes.
> The report distils the conclusions of the meeting and is independent of all
> its sponsoring bodies.
> It says energy will inevitably become less available and more expensive
than
> it has been for the last few decades.
> But the change will be permanent and adapting to this scenario while
> maintaining the UK's standard of living, will require fundamental changes
in
> the way we produce and use energy. All sources of energy will be needed.
> Other findings are that fossil fuels will remain our most important source
> for the next 50 years, despite a growing role for renewable energy. Clean
> systems, including carbon capture and storage, should be pursued urgently.
> Renewable energy sources will play a growing role but will require
continued
> support in development and deployment, if they are to match the cost levels
> of conventional systems.
> And it says government has the key role to play by providing consistent
> market signals, reinforced by structured and affordable incentives,
> implementing regulatory structures to bring about changes in the energy
> system and taking responsibility for an effective engagement of the public
> in the process.
> C Copyright Press Association Ltd 2005, All Rights Reserved.
User avatar
isenhand
Posts: 1296
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by isenhand »

The prime minister said the "blunt truth about the politics of climate change" was that no country would want to sacrifice its economy to meet the challenge, although they all knew they must develop on a "sustainable basis"
.

That was interesting. By doing nothing are we not sacrificing our economy? Are we looking at an ostrich with its head in the sand or at a dodo to be?
The only future we have is the one we make!

Technocracy:
http://en.technocracynet.eu

http://www.lulu.com/technocracy

http://www.technocracy.tk/
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

clv101 wrote:The Guardian didn't even mention nuclear! Is this a case of the Guardian selectively reporting the story
The Geological Society report has 5 sections: Demand, Nuclear, Fossil Fuels, Renewawables and Impact.
To give a balanced report they should mention all five or none. The Guardian chose none whilst the BBC chose one. Therefore I suggest the BBC was being selective whilst the Guardian was not.
DamianB
Site Admin
Posts: 553
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Dorset

Post by DamianB »

nancy wrote:Did they ever follow up on that vote for Peak Oil being the number one topic people voted to see/hear about?
I spoke to someone from the BBC at the Oct. Conf. and she said that they realised that the poll was 'rigged' to a certain extent and therefore ignored the results - though many people at the BBC are aware of PO.
"If the complexity of our economies is impossible to sustain [with likely future oil supply], our best hope is to start to dismantle them before they collapse." George Monbiot
Post Reply