Time to leave the comfort zone

What can we do to change the minds of decision makers and people in general to actually do something about preparing for the forthcoming economic/energy crises (the ones after this one!)?

Moderator: Peak Moderation

Post Reply
Aurora

Time to leave the comfort zone

Post by Aurora »

BBC News - 20/05/08

There are precious few examples of cities that are attempting to reduce energy and resource consumption and improve the quality of life for their citizens, says Sir John Sorrell. But nothing is going to happen, he argues, until politicians accept that they have a mandate to make the tough choices needed.

Article continues ...
21stCNoah
Posts: 1
Joined: 23 May 2008, 16:52

Capitalism

Post by 21stCNoah »

Basically the capitalist society and 'freedom' (private and commercial) we enjoy is not compatible with the VERY hard choices that need to be made for the sake of the environment and the prosepct of oil supplies becoming less reliable NOW! The artical on Cuba changing its agriculture to small scale and local and being taught in schools, due to the USSR colapsing is something like what the developed countries should be doing. But of course in the developed world we have the attitude of throw money and energy sapping activities at something and it will be solved rather than hard co-ordinated team work which may be uncomfortable but necessary!
peaky2
Posts: 188
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 00:10

Post by peaky2 »

Thanks for your certainty Sir Sorrell, but luckily those of us in Transition Cities have decided not to wait for the politicians :)
"[The Transition Movement is] producing solutions, not a shopping list for suicide" - Rob Hopkins
User avatar
Keela
Posts: 1941
Joined: 05 Sep 2006, 15:26
Location: N.Ireland
Contact:

Re: Capitalism

Post by Keela »

21stCNoah wrote:Basically the capitalist society and 'freedom' (private and commercial) we enjoy is not compatible with the VERY hard choices that need to be made for the sake of the environment and the prosepct of oil supplies becoming less reliable NOW! The artical on Cuba changing its agriculture to small scale and local and being taught in schools, due to the USSR colapsing is something like what the developed countries should be doing. But of course in the developed world we have the attitude of throw money and energy sapping activities at something and it will be solved rather than hard co-ordinated team work which may be uncomfortable but necessary!
Well said..... and the system of elections assures us that the politician that promises the rosiest immediate future (at whatever cost to our longterm futures) gets elected. MY OH reckons that a benevolent dictatorship might be the best government style for the changes we face.

Oh and welcome to the forum 21stCNoah - good name! ( I had to read it twice - the first time I saw 21st Century NOSH! :roll: - and wondered :lol: :lol: )

Sally
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin
Posts: 14290
Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Contact:

Re: Capitalism

Post by kenneal - lagger »

Sally wrote:.... MY OH reckons that a benevolent dictatorship might be the best government style for the changes we face.
Ken Livingstone or, perhaps, Boris?
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
User avatar
RenewableCandy
Posts: 12777
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
Location: York

Re: Capitalism

Post by RenewableCandy »

kenneal wrote:
Sally wrote:.... MY OH reckons that a benevolent dictatorship might be the best government style for the changes we face.
Ken Livingstone or, perhaps, Boris?
Been to The Smoke a couple of times since Boris got in. The over-riding impression is that no-one (even the many who voted for him) actually expected him to get in and now they're all wondering what on earth they've let themselves in for...
Soyez réaliste. Demandez l'impossible.
Stories
The Price of Time
User avatar
Keela
Posts: 1941
Joined: 05 Sep 2006, 15:26
Location: N.Ireland
Contact:

Re: Capitalism

Post by Keela »

kenneal wrote:
Sally wrote:.... MY OH reckons that a benevolent dictatorship might be the best government style for the changes we face.
Ken Livingstone or, perhaps, Boris?
I don't think he's actually thought that deeply! Perhaps if it could just be himself... 8) :lol:
Post Reply