Strike on at Grangemouth
Moderator: Peak Moderation
-
- Posts: 1289
- Joined: 15 Jul 2007, 17:02
- Location: uk
- mikepepler
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3096
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Rye, UK
- Contact:
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scott ... -20397498/
UNION bosses were last night planning fresh strike action at the Grangemouth refinery after negotiations stalled again.
A second crippling stoppage could now take place in as little as seven days - shutting the refinery for a month.
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
I'd get someone to have a look at that. Running around with a badly implemented worry stack can lead to all sorts of problems.Vortex wrote:0: I do indeed worry that I worry too much. Now THAT worries me.revdode wrote:You worry too much.Vortex wrote:That should keep most people here happy - either for political or Mad Max reasons.
1: Goto 0
I would imagine it leaves you open to a few exploits and I've already noted a fair number of people flogging dodgy mental software and trying to make political capital out of peak oil.
Stop pushing so much and pop a little.
(sorry old Z80A reference there)
(sorry old Z80A reference there)
Andy Hunt
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
Eternal Sunshine wrote: I wouldn't want to worry you with the truth.
6800 was not so bad, I wrote flight control software for a jet airliner to run on a 68000, just one (microprocessor) generation later...Vortex wrote:Z80A? Z80A?
Why, when I were lad, we would have KILLED for a Z80A!
Nay, we had to make do with a 6800 or even worse a 6502.
Some of my poorer mates only had 4004s ... it were a tough old world back then ...
- RenewableCandy
- Posts: 12777
- Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
- Location: York
Is it still in use??RalphW wrote:6800 was not so bad, I wrote flight control software for a jet airliner to run on a 68000, just one (microprocessor) generation later...Vortex wrote:Z80A? Z80A?
Why, when I were lad, we would have KILLED for a Z80A!
Nay, we had to make do with a 6800 or even worse a 6502.
Some of my poorer mates only had 4004s ... it were a tough old world back then ...
You poor soul . . . not even a single 16-bit register on a 6502.Vortex wrote:Z80A? Z80A?
Why, when I were lad, we would have KILLED for a Z80A!
Nay, we had to make do with a 6800 or even worse a 6502.
Some of my poorer mates only had 4004s ... it were a tough old world back then ...
Programming must have been like breaking rocks.
Andy Hunt
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
Eternal Sunshine wrote: I wouldn't want to worry you with the truth.
Looks like the plane is still flying, I'd recognise those smoke trails anywhere. If it wasn't a military registration the it would have been grounded 20 years agoRenewableCandy wrote: Is it still in use??
When I was on it, the plane was painted orange and yellow...
This looks like the same programme, 15 years later and still experimental.
Even then by the time we wrote the software, the microprocessor had evolved 3 generations...
http://www.spacewar.com/reports/QinetiQ ... m_999.html