Moadib wrote:Totally_Baffled wrote:yep our manafacturing base is so small its only the fifth largest in the world by value!
According to 2008 data we're sixth, behind China, US, Japan, Germany and Italy (and have been behind Italy since 2000.
Actually even sixth surprises me, looking at the huge US move into Mexico, and large investment in S. Korea and Taiwan.
Edit
A different study has us currently sixth, but behind France rather than Italy. The same report shows us 8th in a few years, behind also India (naturally) and South Korea.
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/eco_g ... my-gdp-ppp
Lets agree on the top 10 to allow for the error margins in the figures!
- still pretty good for a nation that "doesn't produce anything anymore!"
Maybe this figure will get it into context, we produce $508 billion dollars of goods.
That is worth more the entire GDP of every country in the world outside the top 20.
If manufacturing is going to be important in the future - the UK is better placed than most. That is my only point!
As for the foreign owned point - does it really matter?
If a factory is based in the UK:
a) The skills are maintained in the UK, as does the a proportion of the money generated by those goods and the wages paid (and money spent with UK suppliers and logistics firms)
b) UK companies own/part own companies all over the globe too. This is something unique to the Chinese, Japanese and Indians! It would be interesting to see a figure of UK owned asset worldwide versus foreign owned assets based in the UK.
c) I know we are discounting oil , but the UK is in a great position to export skills to less mature oil regions of the globe. Isnt Aberdeen a world leader in offshore skills and technology?