Yes. Cities falling is effectively equivalent to dieoff.Vortex wrote:Cities simply HAVE to survive or the game is over.
If the cities go down then we are toast.
Moderator: Peak Moderation
What is meant by "survive" though? I'd say that cities cannot stay as they are now, they will have to change, and their populations will have to decline... but lets hope it's a slow transition, otherwise we are indeed toast! (Hey, we're all going to be toast one day anyway, innit?)fifthcolumn wrote:Yes. Cities falling is effectively equivalent to dieoff.Vortex wrote:Cities simply HAVE to survive or the game is over.
If the cities go down then we are toast.
Personally I think that there's no reason we can't have cities with trains, trolley buses, electric local delivery trucks and a sprinkling of electric cars and lots of electric mopeds and zillions of bicycles. That may be a bit different to what we're used to in the west but EXACTLY what cities in the far east are like.Erik wrote:What is meant by "survive" though? I'd say that cities cannot stay as they are now, they will have to change, and their populations will have to decline... but lets hope it's a slow transition, otherwise we are indeed toast! (Hey, we're all going to be toast one day anyway, innit?)fifthcolumn wrote:Yes. Cities falling is effectively equivalent to dieoff.Vortex wrote:Cities simply HAVE to survive or the game is over.
If the cities go down then we are toast.
I read somewhere that such "wigglers" would not survive at temperatures below -5?C or above 30?C. Temperatures on my roof can range between -7? and 40?C over the year. And my OH says she wants the kitchen worm-free ... Or was she referring to me?phobos wrote:Erik something you may be interested in
Who is going to grow crops if they think the government is going to turn up and take them away? What would be the point in growing them?Vortex wrote:One problem with the city situation is ... dare, I say it ... immigration.
Shortages etc could trigger all sorts of mayhem, which might make cities a lot less attractive.
Additionally, will rural communities allow most of their food to be diverted to immigrant communities in the cities?
(They will be FORCED to hand over their crops, as no government can afford to see the cities explode)
Not all aspects of Energy Descent are delightful, fun filled opportunities....
Yes, the government. My favourite beast.UndercoverElephant wrote:Who is going to grow crops if they think the government is going to turn up and take them away? What would be the point in growing them?Vortex wrote:One problem with the city situation is ... dare, I say it ... immigration.
Shortages etc could trigger all sorts of mayhem, which might make cities a lot less attractive.
Additionally, will rural communities allow most of their food to be diverted to immigrant communities in the cities?
(They will be FORCED to hand over their crops, as no government can afford to see the cities explode)
Not all aspects of Energy Descent are delightful, fun filled opportunities....
If we're going to see shortages here in the west (and that is by no means assured) then there is an alternative to your scenario and that is blockade.Vortex wrote:One problem with the city situation is ... dare, I say it ... immigration.
Shortages etc could trigger all sorts of mayhem, which might make cities a lot less attractive.
Additionally, will rural communities allow most of their food to be diverted to immigrant communities in the cities?
(They will be FORCED to hand over their crops, as no government can afford to see the cities explode)
Not all aspects of Energy Descent are delightful, fun filled opportunities....
Yes. The study I read was that the maximum average confiscation people would tolerate is 75%. Over that you get cut my nose off to spite my face retaliation.Vortex wrote:I assume that the Cuban farmers have to hand over much of their crops .. but as long as they are allowed to keep say 10% they will carry on farming.
A well run - but somewhat unfair - system will work. people will put up with it as long as they get SOMETHING and it is GUARANTEED.
The modern economy is like that: we work 37 hours a week doing stupid things ... and in return we end up with food and a roof over our heads.
Same deal.
Yeh, I often think this, given the rate at which things are currently slowing (touch wood! don't want to speak too soon!) and given how much structural change can occur with the right motivation. However, it's yet to be seen if mitigating social descent is as great a motivator as capital gain has beenPersonally I think that there's no reason we can't have cities with trains, trolley buses, electric local delivery trucks and a sprinkling of electric cars and lots of electric mopeds and zillions of bicycles. That may be a bit different to what we're used to in the west but EXACTLY what cities in the far east are like.
Don't worry, I'm not that deludedNot all aspects of Energy Descent are delightful, fun filled opportunities....
That would simplify things somewhat, eh? But you know me and my Jane-ness!the mothership has landed
We don't need to mitigate anything or even get the government involved.Jane wrote:Good to hear all the points.
Fifth Column wrote:
Yeh, I often think this, given the rate at which things are currently slowing (touch wood! don't want to speak too soon!) and given how much structural change can occur with the right motivation. However, it's yet to be seen if mitigating social descent is as great a motivator as capital gain has beenPersonally I think that there's no reason we can't have cities with trains, trolley buses, electric local delivery trucks and a sprinkling of electric cars and lots of electric mopeds and zillions of bicycles. That may be a bit different to what we're used to in the west but EXACTLY what cities in the far east are like.