No, I know. I see drugs on a scale from extremely soft to extremely hard and the 'slider' of legalisation has been moved to a point past tobacco and alcohol just before the next 'hardest' drug. But don't you think - and I don't want to use some of these drugs myself, mind you - that some illegal drugs are 'softer' than drink or tobacco? Cannabis, for instance, is regarded softer than alcohol. Surely on my scale this justifies it being legal?leroy wrote:emordilnap wrote:Absolutely, but not most drinkers. Also, alcohol is a drug that is deeply embedded in European culture and cannot viably be prohibited for reason discussed previously. I can't see that this is really a justification for Spar to start selling crack rocks next to the Benson&Hedges.You could be talking about drink there, you know...
When I talk about regulating drugs, it's just that I see this as anomaly and think there has to be a better way. More than that, I wonder if we could take away the seedy, violent side of drug use, put a lot of criminals out of work in one swoop, and put users under the spotlight.
My take, to be perfectly honest, is that I can't see the point of legalising some drugs and not others - but all need regulating in some way.