Stressed Britons Flee Gloom for Laid-back Life

[Peter Goodchild]

I could never figure out why in all of Britain there isn't a single Web-site devoted to PO survival issues (I mean, excluding "alternative energy"), whereas there are many in other countries. Even Norway has a few, for heaven's sake. You'd think that as the United Kingdom plunges into the Stone Age with a population density of 248.2 people per square kilometer. . . . I caught this article a few days ago, but it didn't click until now. . . . The survivalists are all taking surfing lessons. Elsewhere.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/4321650a19716.html

STRESSED BRITONS FLEE GLOOM FOR LAID-BACK LIFE

Friday, 21 Dec 2007


Anne Darwin may be the one who hit the headlines, but Britons are emigrating in droves.

Darwin, 55, who returned last weekend from Panama to face charges of deception linked to her husband's "return from the dead" five years after a canoeing accident, was one of record numbers who are leaving.

All have different motivation ? and there is no suggestion of criminality for most ? but while stories about immigrants pouring into Britain feature daily across the pages of British newspapers, less attention is paid to the number who quit.

The latest official migration figures showed that while 591,000 people arrived in Britain last year, a record high of 207,000 Britons left for sunnier climes.

High levels of crime, dreary weather, bad transport and expensive accommodation helped drive Christopher Khalil to Sydney, Australia, said the 33-year old from Rhyl, a seaside town in north Wales.

Australia, where the former superpower used to send its criminals, is the No 1 destination of choice.

"It's a new world out here ? the sun shines every day, the beaches are beautiful, it's cheaper to live, salaries are approaching UK ones and you can live an amazing outdoor lifestyle," Khalil, who now works for an Australian digital media company, said by email.

"There seem to be new people arriving every week in search of a better life and better opportunities," he said.

One-third of last year's emigrants headed to Australia and New Zealand, a quarter went to Spain and France and just under one in 10 to the United States.

Only about 1000 British passport-holders live in Panama, according to the Institute for Public Policy Research, a left-wing think-tank.

"Increasing pressure at work and demands on time in the UK, coupled with increased focus on importance of leisure time, mean that more people are probably considering various quality-of-life issues than they used to ? such as climate, cost of living, value for money, transport facilities and recreational activities," said Neil Prothero, UK analyst at the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU).

Britain languished in 29th place in an EIU "quality of life" survey, coming bottom among the 15 countries of the pre-enlargement European Union.

Australia, Spain and New Zealand ranked respectively 6th, 10th and 15th.

Darwin's husband John "was forever looking at new things and new places on the internet and one day he just came up with Panama", she told the Daily Mirror.

"Brits leave the UK to escape, because they want to enjoy a happy, carefree life again," said Anne Butt, a British nurse who moved to New Zealand.

"After living in London for two years, I was in need of a break from the seriousness of life in the capital," she added.

"For young families especially, the chance to raise a family in a safe, out-of-doors, sporty country, where your income allows you a more enjoyable standard of living is very attractive."

The old settler colonies of Australia and New Zealand promise a warmer climate, open landscapes and relaxed lifestyle ? without requiring new arrivals to learn a foreign language.

In addition, a shortage of skilled labour and ageing populations have prompted both countries to recruit abroad.

"I know as many Brits as Kiwis," said Butt.

"As a skilled migrant ? a nurse ? New Zealand immigration are very welcoming to applications for residency, so it's not really a surprise that I work with so many Brits."

And while rising numbers of eastern and central Europeans are coming to live in Britain ? 92,000 arrived in 2006, of which three-quarters were Polish ? more Britons are moving to Europe, also taking advantage of European Union freedoms.

Spain and France are the top EU destinations, promising cheap wine, a relaxed lifestyle and warmer weather.

A spate of television programmes and newspaper columns on travel, life abroad and property restoration has promoted the idyllic vision of leaving polluted, stressful British cities and investing in a French vineyard or Spanish villa.

"Far more families are coming over here to settle here now, lured by low-cost travel but also by the numerous TV features and other stories in the British press which have jumped on the bandwagon of selling Brits the 'French dream'," said Miranda Neames, editor of French News, an English-language monthly newspaper for Francophiles.

Helen Thorpe, who moved to a country house in southern France a year ago, said she now grows her own fruit and vegetables and shops at the local market.

"A lot of English people come here because it is rather like the England of say 25 years ago; seemingly less crime, people having more time for each other," she said.

Also, "the plot is much larger than we would have been able to afford in Britain."

But the dream of escape does not always work out, and many Britons eventually return.

"Many find out sooner or later that the climate's definitely better but the life isn't necessarily more relaxed especially when the language barrier takes its toll," said Lucy Brown, of Spanish-living.com, a website aimed at English-speaking expats.

"I hear of just as many people returning to the UK because they can't cope with the Spanish system, can't find work, life is much more difficult than they imagined or they miss family, friends," said Brown, who lives in Marbella.

In Anne Darwin's case, it was having a living husband after all ? who was missing his sons ? that put paid to the dream of a new life.

[Bedrock Barney]

The grass is not always greener.

In fact in Australia's case it's not green at all.

[bobthebaker]

The grass is not always greener.

In fact in Australia's case it's not green at all.

Hasn't Aus been in the grip of a drought for a decade or more? Can't see the attraction myself.

[RenewableCandy]

I could never figure out why in all of Britain there isn't a single Web-site devoted to PO survival issues

Erm...hasn't Our Man In Check Shirt just posted to one ?

Now Australia. Wonderful place, wonderful people, BUT:

you can go 40 days without food. Lucky if you can go as long as 4 days without The Wet Stuff.

[Andy Hunt]

It's OK, we will be able to run everything off solar power.

[RevdTess]

It's OK, we will be able to run everything off solar power.

[clv101]

It's OK, we will be able to run everything off solar power.

Right on!

The land area of the UK is 241,590 sq km. The average insolation, the amount of energy from the sun is around 1,000 kWh per square meter per year. Using 15% efficient panels that's 150 kWh per square meter. Multiplying the area by the energy gives us a total resource of 36,238 TWh.

In 2006 the UK used total energy of 243,963 thousand tones of oil equivalent, or ignoring usage efficiency and in TWh, 2,846 TWh.

Therefore just 7.9% of the UK?s solar resource could provide all our energy - oil, coal, gas nuclear etc. In fact, it would really be more like 2.7% because of the thermal inefficiency of the heat engines in cars/power stations compared to the efficiency of an electric economy.

So - no need to worry - we will be able to run everything off solar power.

In fact, if we didn't mind living in the shade, there is enough solar resource to support a continued 2% per year exponential growth in energy consumption for another 183 years!!

Happy Christmas everybody!

[MacG]

It's OK, we will be able to run everything off solar power.

Right on!

The land area of the UK is 241,590 sq km. The average insolation, the amount of energy from the sun is around 1,000 kWh per square meter per year. Using 15% efficient panels that's 150 kWh per square meter. Multiplying the area by the energy gives us a total resource of 36,238 TWh.

In 2006 the UK used total energy of 243,963 thousand tones of oil equivalent, or ignoring usage efficiency and in TWh, 2,846 TWh.

Therefore just 7.9% of the UK?s solar resource could provide all our energy - oil, coal, gas nuclear etc. In fact, it would really be more like 2.7% because of the thermal inefficiency of the heat engines in cars/power stations compared to the efficiency of an electric economy.

So - no need to worry - we will be able to run everything off solar power.

In fact, if we didn't mind living in the shade, there is enough solar resource to support a continued 2% per year exponential growth in energy consumption for another 183 years!!

Happy Christmas everybody!

Have you ever wondered why the manufacturers of solar panels don't run their own processes on solar?

[syberberg]

Have you ever wondered why the manufacturers of solar panels don't run their own processes on solar?

So they can sell more solar panels? (Sorry, couldn't resist).

[Andy Hunt]

Have you ever wondered why the manufacturers of solar panels don't run their own processes on solar?

'Cos it's cheaper to use fossil fuels just now?

[MacG]

Have you ever wondered why the manufacturers of solar panels don't run their own processes on solar?

'Cos it's cheaper to use fossil fuels just now?

I strongly suspect so, yes.

The next question is then: What will happen with the price of solar panels as the price for fossil energy increase?

1) Decrease

X) No change

2) Increase

[Andy Hunt]

I say 2) increase . . .

This is why I always say to people that the price of solar is just as likely to go up as down. Whilst new mass manufacturing techniques have a tendency to bring the price down, increasing manufacturing costs will push it up.

No point in waiting for it to get cheaper 'cos it might not.

If there is a worldwide recession though it might mean cheap solar.

[MacG]

I say 2) increase . . .

This is why I always say to people that the price of solar is just as likely to go up as down. Whilst new mass manufacturing techniques have a tendency to bring the price down, increasing manufacturing costs will push it up.

No point in waiting for it to get cheaper 'cos it might not.

If there is a worldwide recession though it might mean cheap solar.

Only thing to hope for is some research breakthrough I guess. Otherwise the price of solar will always be chased upwards by the price of fossil. The main cost of solar today is to achieve purity of the materials. It costs energy to purify things. Reducing entropy. Roughly the same math as for osmotic pressure and desalination plants.

[MisterE]

The UK is the best place in the world to live, and when PO comes we will ride it easy. Wales will ride PO even easier, I hate all this anti UK crap what is wrong with this man. Yep they are all fleeing I know a good couple of thousand people and guess what not one has left this brilliant country, gods country the green green fecking green grass of home that anchors your heart firmly here. Of all the places I could have been born into the world what luck to be born in the greatest place - its as good if not better than heaven!

[Andy Hunt]

better than heaven!

You should have been in marketing . . .