Here is it being played out:Potemkin Villager wrote: ↑30 Jul 2024, 18:02 What does caving in to the woke brigade mean in practice? Indeed who exactly is "the woke brigade"?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cqe6npgyr5ro
"Academics" refers to the generals of the woke brigade. They are trying to get the Cass Review overturned, because it calls out their ideologically driven unscientific bullshit for what it is. Looks like they are in control of the BMA, just as they have wormed their way into many other important institutions. These are the very same academics whose theories were debunked by Hilary Cass.The British Medical Association (BMA) has called for the ban on puberty blockers for under-18s to be lifted.
The doctors’ union also wants a pause on the implementation of a landmark review into gender care for children and young people.
It said it wanted to undertake an evaluation of the Cass Review after academics expressed concern about its approach.
The good news is that it appears they are not influential enough for the current Labour government to cave into them.
Another source:A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: "The Cass Review is a robust report backed by clinicians and firmly grounded in evidence.
"NHS England will be implementing Dr Cass's recommendations so that children and young people get the safe, holistic care and support they need. We do not support a delay to vital improvements from the NHS to gender services."
https://www.thenational.scot/news/24489 ... on-paused/
"critique" is quoted because of the direct link with Critical Theory. This is how CT operates.THE doctors’ union has called for the implementation of the Cass Review to be paused while it carries out a “critique” of the report’s implementation.
In other words, Cass ignored their propaganda.Members of the BMA's council recently voted in favour of a motion which asked the association to “publicly critique the Cass Review”, due to what it called “unsubstantiated recommendations driven by unexplained study protocol deviations, ambiguous eligibility criteria, and exclusion of trans-affirming evidence”.