Mark wrote: ↑02 Feb 2023, 21:02
Mr Zahawi's HMRC settlement is reportedly an estimated £4.8m, including a 30% penalty of around £1m.
To me, that's theft from the public purse...., whilst in post as Chancellor of the Exchequer....
That's where we ideologically differ.
You think when your neighbour makes money, if he doesn't give it to the taxman, it's theft. It is not. It is his money. His duty is to record all his income, submit it to the taxman and let them adjudicate.
Homebrew, ISA's, premium bonds are all theft if we use your ideology.
Mark wrote: ↑02 Feb 2023, 21:02
To you, he was merely arranging his taxes as to attract the least amount of tax demand...
Spot on.
Mark wrote: ↑02 Feb 2023, 21:02
That's without his 'vagueness' on the number of shares he holds/sold in YouGov....?
Or what Gulf Keystone Petroleum were paying him £210,000/yr for whilst he was supposed to be working as an MP...?
Or setting up Warren Medical, 5 months before he was was appointed as vaccines minister at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic...?
But you know all this because it is on the public record. Shows that with a free press, disclosure rules, opposition parties etc, this stuff is made public. Shows the system is fair and accessible to all, except socialists who always need to take other peoples money by force.
Mark wrote: ↑02 Feb 2023, 21:02
Or how he amassed his massive property empire....?
Probably the same way as i got my property empire. Go to a bank, ask for a loan, they mouse click the currency into a loan, you buy a wreck of a house, and after work (and paye) you go home , have your tea, and then go and start building/plastering/plumbing, until midnight. Hard work but it's worth it. Until a socialist comes along and says,
"You've got more than me, give me some of yours"
Mark wrote: ↑02 Feb 2023, 21:02
You admire this kind of stuff...., but if he'd been claiming too much benefit, you'd be purple with rage....
You've just made that up. We have had this debate before.As someone whose family members, aunts and uncles etc, where on benefits I have witnessed first hand how they destroy lives and futures. Benefits are immoral, dehumanising, takes away the meaning of life in the Aristotle sense. In a civilised society they should be replaced by workfare.
Mark wrote: ↑02 Feb 2023, 21:02
I think it's the reason that there isn't enough money in the pot for the NHS, Social Care, Roads, Defence, Education, Public Transport etc.
No the reason is the government is piss poor at running things. Remember, if the government solely supplied tins of baked beans, they would be £50 a tin. Retiring at 50, sick leave up to a year, golden pensions, period officers, menopause officers, diversity officers, disability access specialist, points based promotion systems, conferences, etc etc etc...........
Thank goodness for the private sector selling beans at 38p (Lidl)