First evididence of methane hydrate positive feedback

For threads primarily discussing Climate Change (particularly in relation to Peak Oil)

Moderator: Peak Moderation

Post Reply
User avatar
PS_RalphW
Posts: 6974
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Cambridge

First evididence of methane hydrate positive feedback

Post by PS_RalphW »

Methane hydrate release in Antarctica not being consumed by bacteria and escaping to the atmosphere in large quantities.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... antarctica

Warming sea water could see massive release of methane, accelerating CO2 equivalent levels sharply

Potential for run-away greenhouse effect?
User avatar
UndercoverElephant
Posts: 13570
Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
Location: UK

Re: First evididence of methane hydrate positive feedback

Post by UndercoverElephant »

PS_RalphW wrote:
Potential for run-away greenhouse effect?
No. Not runaway. This has happened before, and it eventually leads to a new stable state, not runaway warming. Just because we can't stop climate change, doesn't mean it won't eventually stop on its own.
User avatar
clv101
Site Admin
Posts: 10592
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Contact:

Post by clv101 »

Different people use different meanings for runaway. Some use the term to describe the trajectory towards a Venus like climate, some use the term to describe the situation where natural processes/feedbacks overwhelm anthropogenic emissions so that even if we did cut emissions dramatically, atmospheric concentrations continue to rise (for a while), ie we lose control we think we have today.
User avatar
UndercoverElephant
Posts: 13570
Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
Location: UK

Post by UndercoverElephant »

clv101 wrote:Different people use different meanings for runaway. Some use the term to describe the trajectory towards a Venus like climate, some use the term to describe the situation where natural processes/feedbacks overwhelm anthropogenic emissions so that even if we did cut emissions dramatically, atmospheric concentrations continue to rise (for a while), ie we lose control we think we have today.
We've already lost control of the feedback mechanisms. For me "runaway greenhouse effect" means Venus, and there are people out there who actually believe that is what we're heading for.
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin
Posts: 14287
Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Contact:

Post by kenneal - lagger »

For a permanent Venus effect an awful lot more CO2 would have to enter the atmosphere than we have now because methane only stays in the atmosphere for about 25 years. So, yes, we could have a methane burp which could set us into a Venus scenario but it would most likely be for a geologically short time frame of somewhere over 25 years and then the earth would revert to a temperature governed by the CO2 content.

Not good at all for most of the current fauna and flora but not entirely fatal for all our species; some bacteria and viruses for instance. We still still don't have to worry about saving the planet just what lives on it.
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
Post Reply