Vortex2 wrote:Here is my current estimate of risk when going out and about.
This is based on a steady exponential increase of cases, with no adjustments for the effects of recent isolation / separation activities.
The Truth may be very different!
Was that based on today's 115,992?
Here's a knotty maths challenge, once again to highlight DANGER. Recall that some weeks back,
I almost cut my hair... But now, it's crunch time.
Madame Moutarde is still struggling with this. She wants to break social isolation to attend her hairdresser's appointment on 2 April...
I think this is crazy, due to the accumulating close contact risk the hairdressers will have generated by then. Advised her to pay the money to support the business by posting a cheque in solidarity, but forgo the cut and avoid like the er, plague.
Let's assume this village has the national average risk. There are four salon workers present from 1000 till 1700, so all working individual close contact for 6 hours a day, in the same room themselves all day. The appointments average 45 minutes. So let's assume seven customers each per working day, each day progressively more dangerous... A helpful risk reduction factor is the salon only opens Weds to Saturday mornings.
Perhaps I don't need to worry, because either some or all will be struck down for certain, and the salon closed by 2 April, or the newly aware HMG by then will have firmly directed that long hair be grown throughout the land to save them from themselves (per
fashionista Italy).
Course, a barber's would have double the throughput, quick trim and close contact for twenty minutes after the customer waits his turn for ten. A whole new meaning to
Something for the weekend, sir?
When you're dealing with exponential growth, the time to act is when it feels too early.