New coronavirus in/from China

Forum for general discussion of Peak Oil / Oil depletion; also covering related subjects

Moderator: Peak Moderation

User avatar
adam2
Site Admin
Posts: 11019
Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 17:49
Location: North Somerset, twinned with Atlantis

Post by adam2 »

Bedrock Barney wrote:Hello all. Aeons since I last posted on powerswitch although I do call in from time to time to keep up to date.

I work in the construction industry and it's all looking very wobbly out there. Contracts being postponed, contractors getting jittery. I forecast lots of pain going forward. We'll be ok (small husband and wife consultancy with no employees and no debt) but many won't.

Most pertinent question - do i go to London tomorrow for a meeting (using the tube)? I think I know the answer to this :D
Welcome back.
I would postpone or cancel the London meeting. Unless very important, in which case cycle, walk, or take a taxi. None of which eliminate the risk, but seem much lower risk than the crowded and ill ventilated underground.
"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"
fuzzy
Posts: 1388
Joined: 29 Nov 2013, 15:08
Location: The Marches, UK

Post by fuzzy »

I am at work this Friday and Sunday night - and 56. We are quite rural although we meet city folks at work in passing. Even the old school scum who run the UK will have to do something soon, next week, so not too risky this week. London will be a real hot zone though.

Maybe take CJ Peters 'Virus Hunters' for some light reading.
raspberry-blower
Posts: 1868
Joined: 14 Mar 2009, 11:26

Post by raspberry-blower »

Can't you do a conference call thingy or does it have to be a face to face meeting? I am presuming the answer will be the latter.

Interesting to hear what you are saying about the construction industry. Are any of the wobbling companies large corporations? I can think of a couple of companies that may not ride this one out.
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools - Douglas Adams.
Little John

Post by Little John »

My youngest son is working on contract right now in the centre of London

He has to work
Little John

Post by Little John »

vtsnowedin
Posts: 6595
Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 22:14
Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont

Post by vtsnowedin »

Little John wrote:
Bedrock Barney wrote:
Little John wrote:if you want to be certain of not getting infected. I would say no. Out of interest, how old are you?
Slightly the wrong side of 50! Fit and healthy. I'm almost thinking it's better to get it over and done with. Of course, I would regret that if I was at death's door in 2 weeks time....
We have precisely the same dilemma. I sympathize.

I am 56, I work in the care sector with very vulnerable people with mental handicaps. This is further compounded by the fact that my specific client group are all elderly with huge numbers of comorbidities and they require personal hygiene services daily. I cannot wear the kind of protective clothing that would provide adequate protection due to their incapacity to understand and the extreme distress such measures would cause them.

But, I have to work.
My word John, you are in a pickle. May you have the best of luck going forward.
User avatar
Mean Mr Mustard II
Posts: 715
Joined: 27 Jan 2020, 17:43
Location: Cambridgeshire's Edge

Post by Mean Mr Mustard II »

do i go to London tomorrow for a meeting (using the tube)? I think I know the answer to this
Adding up all the Official London numbers as of yesterday, declared this morning = 100 exactly

So, with the time lag from infected to becoming Official Statistic, call that 1000

And another 1000 for those symptomatic community spreaders but not qualifying for testing, eg no travel history - told to self isolate (guessing here, are there stats?)

And their family members who share the same house, but aren't quarantined

And a 25% increase for the time of your meeting.

And another 10% by the time of the return journey - At that point, about 4400 Londoners to avoid, and any surface they've touched over the past 9 days that's not been cleaned.

How pointless is your meeting, and what do you stand to gain from it vs the risks? I certainly wouldn't venture out to buy a lottery ticket now.
When you're dealing with exponential growth, the time to act is when it feels too early.
User avatar
UndercoverElephant
Posts: 13589
Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
Location: UK

Post by UndercoverElephant »

Football matches to be played behind closed doors in Scotland: https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/5 ... -death-uk/

The UK government is going to cave very soon.
User avatar
Vortex2
Posts: 2696
Joined: 13 Jan 2019, 10:29
Location: In a Midlands field

Post by Vortex2 »

The UK government is going to cave very soon.
The 'statement' was ready yesterday evening .. but I bet they are toughening it up as we speak!
User avatar
mikepepler
Site Admin
Posts: 3096
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Rye, UK
Contact:

Post by mikepepler »

Bedrock Barney wrote:Most pertinent question - do i go to London tomorrow for a meeting (using the tube)? I think I know the answer to this :D
I've stopped going to London for work now, but over the past few weeks I tried cycling instead of Tube, and it was actually safer than cycling in the rural town I live in, as the traffic is so slow. I registered to use the TFL bikes, put the app on my phone, and cleaned the handlebars with gel before using the bikes. All worked pretty well.
User avatar
Mean Mr Mustard II
Posts: 715
Joined: 27 Jan 2020, 17:43
Location: Cambridgeshire's Edge

Post by Mean Mr Mustard II »

Little John wrote:just found a good site for data

https://www.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboar ... 484dd4bb14
That's the (inevitably outsourced) trusted partner provider of HM. Govt numbers. About as reliable as unemployment stats, ie, a vaguely useful starting point.

Are there current / cumulative numbers for hospital admissions / discharges, or symptomatic unconfirmed individuals told to self-isolate? Knowing both of those numbers, their locations, and the ratio between them might be fairly handy.

And more precise geography than County level might be good too. Constituency would be particularly good, as these are broadly weighted to population. 650 seats, 67m people, so about 100k each.

There is an easy way that could be done - an online Parliamentary petition. Only signed if clearly been symptomatic, but not hospitalised. That'll automatically register the unseen cases, and very easily analysed by constituency.
When you're dealing with exponential growth, the time to act is when it feels too early.
Initiation
Posts: 93
Joined: 18 Jan 2008, 13:29

Post by Initiation »

As of 9am 12 March 2020, a total of 29,764 people have been tested:

29,174 negative
590 positive
User avatar
Vortex2
Posts: 2696
Joined: 13 Jan 2019, 10:29
Location: In a Midlands field

Post by Vortex2 »

Initiation wrote:As of 9am 12 March 2020, a total of 29,764 people have been tested:

29,174 negative
590 positive
590 positive : My model yesterday suggested 551 for today.

Still a good exponential fit with R*R = 0.99

(These daily figures wander around a bit 'tho)
Last edited by Vortex2 on 12 Mar 2020, 14:50, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
UndercoverElephant
Posts: 13589
Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
Location: UK

Post by UndercoverElephant »

There is talk now about closures of air space and the entire aviation industry being threatened not only with bankruptcy but a permanent reduction in air travel. "The end of corporate air travel".
raspberry-blower
Posts: 1868
Joined: 14 Mar 2009, 11:26

Post by raspberry-blower »

Interesting article at Wolf Street - one of the regular commentators lives in Italy.

https://wolfstreet.com/2020/03/11/i-liv ... -lockdown/
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools - Douglas Adams.
Post Reply