LJ you have been reading too much "Spiked" nonsense and your intellect is being impaired.
Just because journalist Brendan O'Neill says a lot of things that you agree with politically doesn't mean that his opinions, and it is only his opinion, on Climate Science have any validity or even make any sense. Just because he thinks that doing something about Climate Change might hit the working class doesn't mean that the science is wrong and the problem shouldn't be addressed.
Okay Ken, regarding your second point.
So what if I read Spiked online? I read and re-post lots of articles from lots of sources whose political biases are wildly diverging. You should try it.
As for Brendan O'Neill, I happen to disagree with a great deal of what he writes, as it happens. In particular, his writings on the Palestinian/Israeli issue. Also, his extreme libertarianism is, arguably, his defining philosophical characteristic. Which is another significant point of divergence. This really is a most weak and intellectually vacuous line of attack Ken, I am bound to say.
