Iran Watch...
Moderator: Peak Moderation
- adam2
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10902
- Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 17:49
- Location: North Somerset, twinned with Atlantis
I consider a full scale war between the USA and Iran to be unlikely, but do expect an increase in incidents that are "not quite war" such as the odd mysterious explosion of oil tankers or facilities.
I expect that any untoward incident in Iran will be blamed on the USA.
I expect that any terrorist attack in the west will be blamed on Iranian backed groups.
As always, it is prudent to be prepared just in case things get worse than expected.
I expect that any untoward incident in Iran will be blamed on the USA.
I expect that any terrorist attack in the west will be blamed on Iranian backed groups.
As always, it is prudent to be prepared just in case things get worse than expected.
"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"
- ReserveGrowthRulz
- Banned
- Posts: 730
- Joined: 19 May 2019, 08:00
- Location: Colorado
I said no such thing.stumuz1 wrote: So, according to RGR the US will pay the daughter of the killed General $100k dollars and it will be all forgotten.
Last edited by ReserveGrowthRulz on 17 Jun 2020, 12:58, edited 1 time in total.
- ReserveGrowthRulz
- Banned
- Posts: 730
- Joined: 19 May 2019, 08:00
- Location: Colorado
I didn't say the US had the right.UndercoverElephant wrote:What is amazing is that you actually think the US has a right to be the world's policeman.ReserveGrowthRulz wrote: Not amazing at all that this quote would apply to the world's policeman.
Last edited by ReserveGrowthRulz on 17 Jun 2020, 13:00, edited 1 time in total.
- ReserveGrowthRulz
- Banned
- Posts: 730
- Joined: 19 May 2019, 08:00
- Location: Colorado
Says Mr "Plagarize everything from Facebook because I can't think for myself"?Little John wrote:The problem here is that RGR is not prepared to debate honestly.
Last edited by ReserveGrowthRulz on 17 Jun 2020, 13:00, edited 1 time in total.
Very slim chance.clv101 wrote:Who actually thinks the US is going to war with Iran this year? By war, I mean mobilisation on a similar scale to Iraq in 2003 or Afghanistan, not just a few dozen air strikes.
My brother (armaments engineer) fought both the Gulf wars. Said that logistically nothing is in place (from a UK point of view)
The last Gulf wars saw civilian assets (large heavy carriers) Heavy loaders etc being readied months in advance.
Nothing at the moment.
So, very unlikely.
- UndercoverElephant
- Posts: 13500
- Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
- Location: UK
He asked about the US, not the UK. The UK isn't going to war with Iran.stumuz1 wrote:Very slim chance.clv101 wrote:Who actually thinks the US is going to war with Iran this year? By war, I mean mobilisation on a similar scale to Iraq in 2003 or Afghanistan, not just a few dozen air strikes.
My brother (armaments engineer) fought both the Gulf wars. Said that logistically nothing is in place (from a UK point of view)
The last Gulf wars saw civilian assets (large heavy carriers) Heavy loaders etc being readied months in advance.
Nothing at the moment.
So, very unlikely.
- careful_eugene
- Posts: 647
- Joined: 26 Jun 2006, 15:39
- Location: Nottingham UK
I do hope you're right about this, however I suspect if there is any escalation by the US the UK will be piling in alongside as we pretty much do what the US wants.UndercoverElephant wrote:He asked about the US, not the UK. The UK isn't going to war with Iran.stumuz1 wrote:Very slim chance.clv101 wrote:Who actually thinks the US is going to war with Iran this year? By war, I mean mobilisation on a similar scale to Iraq in 2003 or Afghanistan, not just a few dozen air strikes.
My brother (armaments engineer) fought both the Gulf wars. Said that logistically nothing is in place (from a UK point of view)
The last Gulf wars saw civilian assets (large heavy carriers) Heavy loaders etc being readied months in advance.
Nothing at the moment.
So, very unlikely.
Paid up member of the Petite bourgeoisie
First time Bro' was at war, he was defusing booby trap bombs which had been planted in a child's play park, by retreating Iraqi's (now our allies). They were intended as punishment for the Kuwaiti families on their return after fleeing.UndercoverElephant wrote:He asked about the US, not the UK. The UK isn't going to war with Iran.stumuz1 wrote:Very slim chance.clv101 wrote:Who actually thinks the US is going to war with Iran this year? By war, I mean mobilisation on a similar scale to Iraq in 2003 or Afghanistan, not just a few dozen air strikes.
My brother (armaments engineer) fought both the Gulf wars. Said that logistically nothing is in place (from a UK point of view)
The last Gulf wars saw civilian assets (large heavy carriers) Heavy loaders etc being readied months in advance.
Nothing at the moment.
So, very unlikely.
He was in charge of a team that was working with the US marine corps.
When the US goes to war, the UK usually send specialists with them to intelligence gather for future hostilities. This is how we learn to fight future wars.
So, if the US goes to land war, you can bet the farm the UK will tag along for the info.
-
- Posts: 6595
- Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 22:14
- Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont
I suspect the 52 targets "some cultural"are a ploy to spread defensive efforts away from real potential strike points. Chief among them are the nuclear program facilities that we know the location of. Any strike by Iran at any American asset will give a green light to a massive missile attack that will rubbleize every bit of infrastructure that supports their nuclear program. As to cultural sites the one the supreme leader sleeps in is probably the first to go up in a cloud of smoke. Other then that I don't see the cost /benefit ratio for blowing up any cultural objects or sites.
- UndercoverElephant
- Posts: 13500
- Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
- Location: UK
- ReserveGrowthRulz
- Banned
- Posts: 730
- Joined: 19 May 2019, 08:00
- Location: Colorado
vtsnowedin wrote:I suspect the 52 targets "some cultural"are a ploy to spread defensive efforts away from real potential strike points. Chief among them are the nuclear program facilities that we know the location of. Any strike by Iran at any American asset will give a green light to a massive missile attack that will rubbleize every bit of infrastructure that supports their nuclear program. As to cultural sites the one the supreme leader sleeps in is probably the first to go up in a cloud of smoke. Other then that I don't see the cost /benefit ratio for blowing up any cultural objects or sites.
Last edited by ReserveGrowthRulz on 17 Jun 2020, 13:01, edited 1 time in total.
That was a long time ago and another world awayUndercoverElephant wrote:The UK doesn't always do as the US wants. That's why we did not get involved in Vietnam.Little John wrote:Yes, the UK is America's chief bitch. This was true pre-Brexit and may or may not continue to be true post Brexit unless other things change that are nothing to do with Brexit.
- Potemkin Villager
- Posts: 1961
- Joined: 14 Mar 2006, 10:58
- Location: Narnia
The west needs a land war in Iran like a hole in the head. You don't need a degree in miltary strategy to work out that it would be the ultimate clusterfuck. Many Iranians, whatever their political persuasion, will have had very bad experiences in their families of the era of the Shah and his secret police installed at the behest of the UK, US and British Petroleum. It is a mountainous country, unlike Iraq, with no shortage of wannabe heros and would probably be a rerun of various disastrous incursions into Afghanistan.stumuz1 wrote:
So, if the US goes to land war, you can bet the farm the UK will tag along for the info.
Still der trumpf is arrogant and stupid enough to think it a good idea. At some point with an enormous military and civilian body count he would probably claim "mission accomplished".
My bet is that most of the US generals are not stupid. Genocidal, if they can get away with it, and not above fomenting coups or engaging in the odd political assassination to be sure. But, not suicidal.Potemkin Villager wrote:The west needs a land war in Iran like a hole in the head. You don't need a degree in miltary strategy to work out that it would be the ultimate clusterfuck. Many Iranians, whatever their political persuasion, will have had very bad experiences in their families of the era of the Shah and his secret police installed at the behest of the UK, US and British Petroleum. It is a mountainous country, unlike Iraq, with no shortage of wannabe heros and would probably be a rerun of various disastrous incursions into Afghanistan.stumuz1 wrote:
So, if the US goes to land war, you can bet the farm the UK will tag along for the info.
Still der trumpf is arrogant and stupid enough to think it a good idea. At some point with an enormous military and civilian body count he would probably claim "mission accomplished".
I think Trump has been bamboozled by the likes of Pompeo into thinking he could get away with this shite to bolster his numbers as a bulwark against the ongoing impeachment (which is, itself, more political bullshit). But, he is now probably, belatedly, realizing it is all blowing up in his face.