Lord Beria3 wrote:Eurointeligence latest...
I don't usually agree with Eurointelligence, at least not in entirety, but I think they're spot on with this one.
A lot rides on the procedure for selecting a new govt-of-national-unity after failing a confidence vote. I have no idea how this would work. Say Boris loses his two confidence votes and the govt has to resign. Boris goes to the Queen and requests an election date, oooh, I don't know, November 1st. At what point does Her Majesty go "Actually we should ask Dominic Grieve if he can do the job" ? How does parliament even choose someone to go to the Queen and ask to try to form a govt? And why would Corbyn support them if that leader isn't him? He'd surely prefer a GE at any point regardless of the implied Brexit outcome. I don't know what he think he'll achieve with 20% vote vs the Tories' 35%+ bounce from getting Brexit done and the end of the Brexit Party.... Well, anyway, I'd be quite surprised if someone manages to pull off a national unity govt including Corbyn, the SNP, LibDems, Green, all the independents etc before October 31st.
The easier route must surely be to make a new law that forces the PM to revoke A50 before October 31st if a new deal has not been agreed in the meantime. That doesn't mean A50 can't be restarted, especially after a new mandate from a GE. Of course that would be disastrous for the Tories who would be seen to have failed, and the BXP would no doubt do extremely well in subsequent elections. Labour would however also lose massively since to vote to revoke A50 outright in the case of no deal would also go against their promises. This is why Eurointelligence are probably right to say that voting to revoke A50 is extremely unlikely. But I still think it's more likely than a VonC preventing the govt exiting with no deal on October 31st.
I'm personally pretty sanguine about a no deal exit. I still think leaving the EU is a tragedy for the country, and I still don't see any evidence that the EU are the undemocratic corrupt evil that many Brexiteers insist, and I'd still prefer EU governance to UK parliament governance if I'm honest. The difference between listening to EU commission leaders and listening to the UK govt is like the difference between listening to Barack Obama vs Donald Trump after any national tragedy.
But if we have to leave (and I really think the country has changed its mind on this, but here we are anyway), then better to start from scratch and negotiate our way back in to what we want, and even better to have a nauseating Tory/DUP/BXP government to blame any failures on. Of course 'what we want' may depend hugely on a November election which I think Corbyn would be stupid to demand.