Iran: Pieces in Place for Escalation
Moderator: Peak Moderation
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/6297149.stm
The US military has given the first public display of what it says is a revolutionary heat-ray weapon to repel enemies or disperse hostile crowds.
Looks more like a mobile basketball net and backing board to me. Perhaps they'll get the Harlem Globetrotters to operate it.
The US military has given the first public display of what it says is a revolutionary heat-ray weapon to repel enemies or disperse hostile crowds.
Looks more like a mobile basketball net and backing board to me. Perhaps they'll get the Harlem Globetrotters to operate it.
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
Time to get out the lead underpants and tinfoil hats.
Seriously though i'm sure it could be defeated with a simple survival bag, or one of these:
Ouch, could be painful, good job hes wearing that suit.
Seriously though i'm sure it could be defeated with a simple survival bag, or one of these:
Ouch, could be painful, good job hes wearing that suit.
Rob
XENG - University of Exeter Engineering Society
"Now there is one outstandingly important fact regarding Spaceship Earth, and that is that no instruction book came with it." - R. Buckminster Fuller
XENG - University of Exeter Engineering Society
"Now there is one outstandingly important fact regarding Spaceship Earth, and that is that no instruction book came with it." - R. Buckminster Fuller
Times Article "New US strategy on Iran emerges from Dav
Here's the 'non-PO aware' take on the US vs. Iran conflict:
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/artic ... 51,00.html
The article is suggesting that the US moves are merely to soften Iran up in advance of possible negotiations. It also suggests that Iran is vulnerable financially because oil may drop to $35 and that Saudia Arabia, who is on the US side in this fight, could increase production to damage Iran through lower prices.
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/artic ... 51,00.html
The article is suggesting that the US moves are merely to soften Iran up in advance of possible negotiations. It also suggests that Iran is vulnerable financially because oil may drop to $35 and that Saudia Arabia, who is on the US side in this fight, could increase production to damage Iran through lower prices.
Anatole Kaletsky in the Times wrote:This brings us to the final and most interesting strand in the anti-Iranian policy nexus: the price of oil. Iran?s economy depends entirely on oil sales, which account for 90 per cent of exports and a roughly equal share of the Government?s budget. Since last July, a barrel of oil has fallen from $78 to just over $50, reducing the Government?s revenues by one third. If the oil price fell into the $35 to $40 range, Iran would shift into deficit, and with access to foreign borrowing cut off by UN sanctions, the Government?s capacity to continue financing foreign proxies would quickly run out. Iran has reacted to this threat by calling on Opec to stabilise prices but, in practice, only one country has the clout to do this: Saudi Arabia. Earlier this month, in a highly significant statement, Ali al-Naimi, the Saudi Oil Minister, publicly opposed Iranian calls for production cuts to halt the decline in prices. Mr Naimi's pronouncement was cast as a technical matter unconnected with politics, but it seemed to confirm private warnings by King Abdullah that his country would try everything to thwart Iran?s hegemony in Iraq and throughout the region, whether by military intervention or more subtle economic means.
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle ... 289981.stm
BBC News: 23/01/07:
BBC News: 23/01/07:
The Iranians have obviously got some money left in the piggy bank. I wonder how 'Armydinnerjacket' squared this purchase with his somewhat disenchanted superiors.Russia has completed a contract to sell some 30 air defence missile systems to Iran, a senior official has said.
The head of the state-run weapons exporter Rosoboronexport was quoted by Russian media as saying that delivery was completed at the end of last year.
The deal - worth $700m (?380m) and signed last year - has angered the US and Israel who say Iran may use the missiles to attack its neighbours.
Russia says its Tor-M1 system is short-range and purely defensive.
"[Russia] fully completed delivery to Iran of the Tor-M1 missile complexes at the end of December 2006," Itar-Tass news agency quoted Sergei Chemezov as saying.
Defence Minister Sergei Ivanov has previously said that because of their technical characteristics, the missiles cannot be used by terrorist groups.
Washington wants all countries to stop exporting weapons to Iran, but Russia and China strongly oppose the move.
Both countries voted for a UN resolution which bans sensitive nuclear trade with Tehran, but there are no sanctions on conventional weapons.
Well, they should know all about that!the US and Israel who say Iran may use the missiles to attack its neighbours.
The only future we have is the one we make!
Technocracy:
http://en.technocracynet.eu
http://www.lulu.com/technocracy
http://www.technocracy.tk/
Technocracy:
http://en.technocracynet.eu
http://www.lulu.com/technocracy
http://www.technocracy.tk/
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14287
- Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
- Location: Newbury, Berkshire
- Contact:
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/mid ... 198418.ece
Here's a cheery way to start the day. This seems to me the most likely way Iran could end up getting properly dragged in. In fact, difficult to see a different scenario a year or two from now other than the US staying put forever more.
Here's a cheery way to start the day. This seems to me the most likely way Iran could end up getting properly dragged in. In fact, difficult to see a different scenario a year or two from now other than the US staying put forever more.
There was an interesting item on Today at the end of the programme...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/liste ... ndex.shtml
It's a three hour programme, so you need to open the audio in Real Player (link on left of page), rather than the "BBC Player" and use Real Player to scroll through to the start of the item at 2:52:30.
Also, there's this article in the Guardian.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/liste ... ndex.shtml
It's a three hour programme, so you need to open the audio in Real Player (link on left of page), rather than the "BBC Player" and use Real Player to scroll through to the start of the item at 2:52:30.
Also, there's this article in the Guardian.