Gas alert as demand and prices rise

Discussion of the latest Peak Oil news (please also check the Website News area below)

Moderator: Peak Moderation

Locked
fuzzy
Posts: 1388
Joined: 29 Nov 2013, 15:08
Location: The Marches, UK

Post by fuzzy »

It's a shame no-one has invented a flammable solid we could just pile up next to a power station for when we need it.
AutomaticEarth
Posts: 823
Joined: 08 Nov 2010, 00:09

Post by AutomaticEarth »

fuzzy wrote:It's a shame no-one has invented a flammable solid we could just pile up next to a power station for when we need it.
You mean the black/brown stuff supplied by our very own mother Nature that smells nice when burned? :lol:

Funnily enough, we had a power station nearby in Tilbury (Essex) that went from burning coal to burning wood-chips supplied from Canada.

Turns out they ended up being unsuitable for this particular power station (there was a massive fire there some years back, and they rotted quickly.

In addition, I was informed by someone who worked there that it was actually more expensive to ship them here, and that the carbon emissions were higher when production and transportation were factored in, than just burning the coal that the power station had access to (although I can't substantiate that claim).

I'm all in favour of reducing our reliance on fossil fuels, but not if it means major distruption due to reliance and gas supplied from elsewhere. What happened to all those gas storage facilities that use to go rise and fall when I was a kid that we used to have? They looked awesome :lol:
User avatar
adam2
Site Admin
Posts: 10910
Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 17:49
Location: North Somerset, twinned with Atlantis

Post by adam2 »

Most of the old style gas holders have been scrapped. They would have been of relatively little use under today circumstances in any case. I have heard, but can not substantiate, that an old style gas holder would run a modern gas burning power station for less than a minute.

They were a relic of when gas was manufactured locally from coal. The rate of manufacture of coal gas was not quickly altered in line with changing demand, therefore local storage for a few hours to a few days local demand was required.

What we need now is seasonal storage, not day to day.
"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"
fuzzy
Posts: 1388
Joined: 29 Nov 2013, 15:08
Location: The Marches, UK

Post by fuzzy »

A big enough tank of LNG, well insulated, and a PV powered refrigeration plant to keep it stable, is all I can come up with now.
User avatar
adam2
Site Admin
Posts: 10910
Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 17:49
Location: North Somerset, twinned with Atlantis

Post by adam2 »

fuzzy wrote:A big enough tank of LNG, well insulated, and a PV powered refrigeration plant to keep it stable, is all I can come up with now.
That would help, apart from the NIMBY factor, and the cost. Whom is going to pay ?

Might not even need refrigeration in fact. Cooling down to liquid methane temperatures is a relatively costly and complicated business, and it might be simpler to accept a small steady rate of boiling off. AFAIK the existing LNG stores at import terminals are not refrigerated.
Any such facilities would have to be located at existing LNG terminals of course.

Note the gas that boils off is not lost to the atmosphere, it is injected into the gas network and sold to consumers. Think of it not as a "loss" but as a minimum withdrawal rate.
"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"
User avatar
BritDownUnder
Posts: 2494
Joined: 21 Sep 2011, 12:02
Location: Hunter Valley, NSW, Australia

Post by BritDownUnder »

adam2 wrote:Most of the old style gas holders have been scrapped. They would have been of relatively little use under today circumstances in any case. I have heard, but can not substantiate, that an old style gas holder would run a modern gas burning power station for less than a minute.
Quite true. I was under the impression that as well as being a tempting target for the IRA these gasometers were used for the town gas when each town had it's own gasworks. However I am sure that North Sea Gas would stored there for a while in the 70s and 80s.

Putting on my Professor David MacKay hat for a moment as I am working at a gas plant at present and one cubic metre of methane is 0.6 kg in weight at approximate atmospheric temperature and pressure. A 30 megawatt gas turbine will use approximately 20,000 kg of gas per hour. Given a gasometer will contain, say 30,000 cubic metres of gas then scaling up to a 2000 MW gas fired plant (not sure they get this big) it would quite easily get through all this gas in a minute. However a small town would probably get by for a whole weekend on the same volume of gas.

At university I remember being told that a 2000 megawatt coal power plant uses one tonne of coal per second. Sobering thought. A tonne of coal lasted our family all year in the 1980s for cooking, water heating and space heating.

A similarly sized LNG tank would contain liquid methane which may be around 1000 times as dense as gas. Having these dotted around the country might be a temping target for anyone with malicious intent.
G'Day cobber!
User avatar
adam2
Site Admin
Posts: 10910
Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 17:49
Location: North Somerset, twinned with Atlantis

Post by adam2 »

Natural gas prices have increased somewhat over the last week or two, to about 1.6 UK pence per KWH.
There is nothing remarkable or concerning about such a price in itself, it has previously been higher.
It is however rather early in the season for prices to increase thus.

Stocks have increased marginally but still only amount to about 20,000GWH in total.
"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin
Posts: 14290
Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Contact:

Post by kenneal - lagger »

BritDownUnder wrote:....A similarly sized LNG tank would contain liquid methane which may be around 1000 times as dense as gas. Having these dotted around the country might be a temping target for anyone with malicious intent.
Having a load of mini nukes dotted around the country, as has been suggested in our local paper recently, would be an even greater target and risk.
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
User avatar
mikepepler
Site Admin
Posts: 3096
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Rye, UK
Contact:

Post by mikepepler »

https://www.ft.com/content/564a1ec0-828 ... b2513cb3ff
A decision to close permanently the UK’s largest natural gas storage site will leave the country more dependent on imports and greater volatility in prices in winter months, an alliance of energy companies has warned.

The Energy & Utilities Alliance (EUA), a trade body whose members include SSE, EDF Energy and ScottishPower, is pressing for a Parliamentary inquiry into the long-term consequences of the closure of Centrica’s Rough storage site off the Yorkshire coast.
...
But some organisations are concerned that there is a complacency in Whitehall about the longer-term ramifications of the loss of a strategically important asset that provided a crucial supply buffer during winter months.
At least some people think it's worth considering the impact! The article says BEIS says it's OK to close it because the market had already factored closure in, but that's not the same as 'the market' having a viable plan for where the gas will come from during cold weather, especially if other pieces of infrastructure break, which seems to happen most years...
User avatar
adam2
Site Admin
Posts: 10910
Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 17:49
Location: North Somerset, twinned with Atlantis

Post by adam2 »

No need for a Parliamentary enquiry.
I already know the outcome of the enquiry :)

It will call for further studies, reviews and consultations, without actually DOING anything, but also without actually stating that nothing NEED be done.

Doing anything= too expensive, bound to upset some pressure group.
Not doing anything= politically risky if it all goes horribly wrong and someone had said "we do not need to do anything"

Much safer to call for more studies, reviews, consultations, and perhaps some research into magic fairy dust/perpetual motion.
"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin
Posts: 14290
Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Contact:

Post by kenneal - lagger »

Could the government be closing the storage to make it more important that we have our own fracked gas?
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
User avatar
adam2
Site Admin
Posts: 10910
Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 17:49
Location: North Somerset, twinned with Atlantis

Post by adam2 »

kenneal - lagger wrote:Could the government be closing the storage to make it more important that we have our own fracked gas?
Unlikely IMHO, firstly the gas storage died of old age rather than being closed by the government, and secondly I doubt that they are bright enough.
"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14814
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

Ireland is gearing up to import more LNG following the failure and/or decline of its own offshore gas projects. I believe it's being shipped from the States; I have few details.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
User avatar
mikepepler
Site Admin
Posts: 3096
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Rye, UK
Contact:

Post by mikepepler »

Closing the storage isn't the issue - as Adam said, it is old and broken. The problem is not having a replacement, and not having made efforts to reduce consumption. replacements would take a long time to get ready, so reducing consumption is probably the only course of action if it gets cold and/or there's a supply disruption. Whether that's through voluntary means or power cuts (thus saving gas in CCGTs and disabling gas boilers) remains to be seen...
User avatar
adam2
Site Admin
Posts: 10910
Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 17:49
Location: North Somerset, twinned with Atlantis

Post by adam2 »

I cant foresee any restrictions on the domestic use of gas as there is no realistic way to enforce any such restrictions.

There are however other ways of reducing gas consumption.

Increase coal burning for electricity production.
Increase oil burning for electricity production.
Prohibit the use of gas or electricity for heating leisure facilities.
Prohibit heating of public buildings and workplaces to over 16 degrees.
Prohibit external electric lighting of buildings.
Prohibit electrically illuminated advertising.
Restrict electric street lighting.
Prohibit gas street lighting.
Restrict operation of electric railways, substituting diesel or steam power.
Rota power cuts.
Restrict some or all trades to a 3 day week, for electricity consumption.

Require that all grid connected CCGT plant that is physically able to burn oil does convert to oil, even if this be otherwise prohibited. May need road closures etc for oil deliveries.

Look into hastening completion of any wind turbine installations that are already planned. Fast track any ancillary works that are delaying completion.

Most of the above would require that a state of emergency be declared.
"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"
Locked