USA presidential elections 2016
Moderator: Peak Moderation
-
- Posts: 4124
- Joined: 06 Apr 2009, 22:45
I had the same thought.PS_RalphW wrote:5/3/33
If I was Latino in the US I would be afraid.
The murder rate is going to go way up.
As for UE saying the outcome was obvious, that seems to be a trumpesque statement. There was nothing obvious about it to many, if not the majority, of people.
To become an extremist, hang around with people you agree with. Cass Sunstein
- Lord Beria3
- Posts: 5066
- Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 20:57
- Location: Moscow Russia
- Contact:
- careful_eugene
- Posts: 647
- Joined: 26 Jun 2006, 15:39
- Location: Nottingham UK
- UndercoverElephant
- Posts: 13501
- Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
- Location: UK
- UndercoverElephant
- Posts: 13501
- Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
- Location: UK
This is exactly what happened.UndercoverElephant wrote:I don't agree. I don't bet, but at this point if I was a betting man I would certainly back Trump to win. I have just got a feeling that Hillary Clinton is sufficiently despised by enough of the American public that even the fear of a Donald Trump presidency will not provoke them to vote for her. They will stay at home. Meanwhile, some Sanders supporters will actually vote for Trump instead of switching to Clinton.clv101 wrote:Any objective analysis suggests that's less likely than Clinton wining.UndercoverElephant on July 9th wrote:Trump is going to win.
http://www.smh.com.au/comment/why-donal ... pd47b.html
- UndercoverElephant
- Posts: 13501
- Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
- Location: UK
There you go, Mr "in touch with reality" Hemming. I was right, you were spectacularly wrong. Perhaps something to remember next time you are thinking of telling me that I don't understand politics.UndercoverElephant wrote:Other way around. Sanders can beat Trump, Clinton can't. That's what all the polls say.johnhemming2 wrote:I think Clinton also will win the elected delegates as well as the super delegates. She is then likely to beat Trump. I am not sure Sanders would beat Trump.
Clinton is up the arse of the establishment, like somebody else I might mention. The US public is sick of establishment politicians. If Clinton wins the democratic nomination, we're looking at President Trump.
Yes, nicely done, LB3, Steve also. I didn't think Trump was as unlikely as Brexit but I still thought Clinton would take the day. It looks like a carbon copy of the Brexit 'miscalculation'. It shows the establishment made a massive mistake running with Clinton - many others could have beaten Trump.UndercoverElephant wrote:This is exactly what happened.UndercoverElephant wrote:I don't agree. I don't bet, but at this point if I was a betting man I would certainly back Trump to win. I have just got a feeling that Hillary Clinton is sufficiently despised by enough of the American public that even the fear of a Donald Trump presidency will not provoke them to vote for her. They will stay at home. Meanwhile, some Sanders supporters will actually vote for Trump instead of switching to Clinton.clv101 wrote: Any objective analysis suggests that's less likely than Clinton wining.
http://www.smh.com.au/comment/why-donal ... pd47b.html
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14814
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
A country of so many hundreds of millions of people produces a "choice" of between Trump and Clinton. Oh, and you can have a right-wing regime or a hard-right-wing regime.
"Anyone can be president", they say - an example of how the people of America lie to themselves and are lied to. A strange bunch.
"Anyone can be president", they say - an example of how the people of America lie to themselves and are lied to. A strange bunch.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14814
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14814
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14814
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
We already have a plethora of multi-billionaire interests dictating national and international policies.
SourceBut let's state it for what actually it is: self-serving, powerful, wealthy elite interests acting in collusion with politicians and demonstrating utter contempt for democracy and ordinary folk.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker