USA presidential elections 2016

[raspberry-blower]

Clinton is very ill and trump will likely learn from this debacle. Check out my blog for more.

Plus google clinton and concussion you will be shocked. The msm are hiding this.

Beria, you may be interested in the latest from Michael Krieger:
Liberty Blitzkrieg: Why isn't the media covering Hilary Clinton's extremely bizarre behaviour?

This episode warrants a detailed explanation by the Hillary campaign to the American public. How can someone incapable of finishing a campaign stump speech without personal coaching be elected President? Moreover, why isn’t the mainstream media asking the simple questions that I, and countless others are asking?

[Lord Beria3]

http://www.dangerandplay.com/2016/08/06 ... hing-fits/

Check this article out.

It actually freaked me out.

I do wonder how Clinton will perform at the debates against Trump. Will she have a mental breakdown in front of the nation live? After all, if she struggles with stress, debating with the unpredictable Trump must be up there!!!

Surely she would be politically finished if she has a breakdown in front of millions?

[UndercoverElephant]

Clinton is very ill and trump will likely learn from this debacle. Check out my blog for more.

Plus google clinton and concussion you will be shocked. The msm are hiding this.

Beria, you may be interested in the latest from Michael Krieger:
Liberty Blitzkrieg: Why isn't the media covering Hilary Clinton's extremely bizarre behaviour?

This episode warrants a detailed explanation by the Hillary campaign to the American public. How can someone incapable of finishing a campaign stump speech without personal coaching be elected President? Moreover, why isn’t the mainstream media asking the simple questions that I, and countless others are asking?

Wow. She cannot be President. This cannot be covered up indefinitely, and probably not long enough for her to be elected. Which leaves both the Republicans and Democrats with a candidate who is literally unfit to be President.

[UndercoverElephant]

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... ns-health/

Democrat frontrunner Hillary Clinton’s disappearance from the debate stage last month left people speculating that the former First Lady took a long bathroom break, but now a law-enforcement source with inside connections is alleging that Clinton was missing from the stage due to health issues stemming from a previous brain injury.

These long-lasting symptoms stemming from a concussion and blood clot, according to a neurologist, suggest Clinton is suffering from post-concussion syndrome, which can severely impact her cognitive abilities.

[Lord Beria3]

This is a HUGE story UE.

Trump will definitely exploit this one way or another.

No mainstream corporate media outlets are currently discussing it, but thanks to the internet, it could go viral in the coming weeks to come.

I do sense that this could be a turning point, if the ordinary voter gets to see these very disturbing videos, Clinton is toast.

Watch this space folks.

* Although I am a Trump leaning supporter, I do try to keep a distance from it and see it from a floating voter who can see two very flawed candidates fighting it out.

Thanks to the khan scandal, my inner "floating voter" was leaning towards Hilary. Those weird videos of Hilary have crushed that and sent me straight back to Trump.

I suspect that the same pattern will happen to millions of ordinary Americans if this story gets out. No wonder the pro-Clinton corporate media machine are desperately trying to shut this story down!!!

[woodburner]

This is a rather sad situation. Brain injury is nothing to gloat over, but I don't deny it can have a dramatic effect on cognitive processes. From a personal perspective this should be treated with some compassion. If you haven't met someone who is suffering from brain injury, I suggest you get out and remedy the situation. It can take a normally functioning person and remove half their personality.

There is as I understand it a historcal problem with the Clinton dynasty (and **nasty being significant). This makes Clinton undesirable. Could this be an opportunity for Ernie Sanders to step into the shoes? That would be a good thing.

To talk about Trump being preferable as a president is just totally daft. He is a total liar and knows nothing more than how to get away with lies and deceipt, and at the same time be a thoroughly detestable character. Saying he is better than Clinton as a prospective president is like eating dog turds because you can't find any hot dogs.

From UE's link

These are two people that aren’t just personal friends. I worked with one and then post law-enforcement worked with another on some related things. So, these aren’t anonymous people. These are good friends. Both of them told me the same thing, that after her speeches, whether she did a talk or a policy speech, she had to sit behind – she would come off the podium backstage – and have to sit and rest before making it back to the car because she was so fatigued, dizzy and disoriented.

They don't sound like "good" or "friend" to me, if the reference was to Clinton. If it refers to the writer maybe that's ok.

[UndercoverElephant]

This is a rather sad situation. Brain injury is nothing to gloat over, but I don't deny it can have a dramatic effect on cognitive processes. From a personal perspective this should be treated with some compassion. If you haven't met someone who is suffering from brain injury, I suggest you get out and remedy the situation. It can take a normally functioning person and remove half their personality.

My father in law is a brain-injured stroke victim. He went from being a university lecturer, author and ofsted inspector, to turning people's freezers off when they aren't looking, stealing wallets and putting them in his pants, and smearing shit on the walls of his toilet. Total transformation of personality.

[Lord Beria3]

Of course I feel a degree of human sympathy to hilary. However much of that has disappeared as she has chosen to run for the presidency despite having clear health problems.

I can't forgive her for that decision or trying to hide it from the American people.

She deserves to be smoked out. Assuming that she approaches this like email gate, e.g. serial lies, I would not expect her to withdraw from the race if it went public.

Automatically trump is the preferred candidate by the simple fact he is not mentally desturbed. Thats political reality mate.

[johnhemming2]

If it was a huge story you would expect it to have already been mentioned.

[Lord Beria3]

Only started getting mentioned in briebart (alt media source) a few days ago, so give it time.

Also suspect that the Trump campaign are discussing how to play this. Let it build up and explode or politicize it which is risky.

Also need to factor in the possibility that if this goes public too early, the Dems may replace Clinton with somebody more electable. Might be worth letting this build up in the cyber space for a while before pushing the story into the mainstream.

Once ordinary Americans watch those videos her poll ratings will collapse.

[Lord Beria3]

For those who find this political take on it distasteful... get real. Its a presidential thread and a candidate is running for the toughest job in the world.

If they don't have the ability to cope, they should withdraw.

[UndercoverElephant]

If it was a huge story you would expect it to have already been mentioned.

Hah! You might just have well written: "You can trust the mainstream media. If there's a story worth reporting, you can rely on them to keep the public informed." Only one problem with this: it is total bollocks.

[johnhemming2]

If it was a huge story you would expect it to have already been mentioned.

Hah! You might just have well written: "You can trust the mainstream media. If there's a story worth reporting, you can rely on them to keep the public informed." Only one problem with this: it is total bollocks.

That is, however, paranoid nonsense. Unless there is an injunction the various media will tend to report on things that they think that their readers would like to read. (hear/watch etc).

[UndercoverElephant]

If it was a huge story you would expect it to have already been mentioned.

Hah! You might just have well written: "You can trust the mainstream media. If there's a story worth reporting, you can rely on them to keep the public informed." Only one problem with this: it is total bollocks.

That is, however, paranoid nonsense.

No it isn't, and the fact that you think otherwise just confirms you are a willing mouthpiece of the establishment and/or detached from the reality of normal people.

Unless there is an injunction the various media will tend to report on things that they think that their readers would like to read. (hear/watch etc).

Rubbish. Total nonsense. There are instructions from those at the top - owners, senior management, etc... about what to report and what not to report, and how to report it. I know this for a fact. My wife spent many years working as a sub-editor for the Sunday Times and The Guardian. To give you a real world example, if a writer for the ST refers to "strikers" or "protestors", the word is changed by the sub-editor to "militants". There are many other examples of this. And are you seriously trying to convince people that Rupert Murdoch doesn't use his considerable power to try to further his considerable political agenda?

There are countless other specific examples, the Julian Assange case being a very obvious one, and a case where you have previously demonstrated your position as a mouthpiece of the establishment, and actually defending the grotesquely biased non-reporting of the real story.

I don't know who you think you are fooling, John, but it doesn't include anybody who posts regularly on this board.

[Little John]

Utter tripe John Hemming, as usual