I don't doubt that you find these crimes as abhorrent as the rest of us but they were perpetrated by supposedly peaceful Muslims whose culture and religion treats non Muslims as second class or worse. Their Holy Scripture encourages the killing of non believers and people who leave Islam or don't believe in the correct version of Islam. Women whose behaviour brings shame on the family have offended against the Quran and so become liable for all sorts of grisly treatment. Men don't seem to have the same restraints put on them.biffvernon wrote:Well I did read your post. Being optimistic I wondered whether you were apologising for your comment, "We have been down that route before because of people like you, Biff Vernon, and thousands of young girls have been completely unnecessarily put through hell."
That breaks all records for the most offensive post I've ever had directed at me.
Your recent insinuations of criminal racial hatred against those of us who see these crimes and, not just one murder, many, many murders and relate it to the religion that condones and even encourages these attacks in its written scriptures I find as offensive as you do my accusation against people of your thought patterns. It was precisely the accusations of racism, similar to yours in this thread, over the years which prevented the earlier investigation of the Rotherham crimes and others of a similar nature all over the country. You seem quite happy for that mindset to be carried forward.
It is fear of accusations of racism or Islamophobia which is stopping any publicity on the widespread attacks by the mainstream Muslim community on Ahmediyya Muslims across the country and indeed the whole world. Asad Shah might be the first to be known to have been murdered for being an Ahmediyya Moslem in this country but he is not the first to have been attacked. Where is the condemnation from the mainstream Muslim community asking for good old British values of toleration?
It is not your suggestion that a murderer is a psychopath that is the problem but the fact that you deny the fact that his religion might have anything to do with the reason for his attack.How can that be prompted by my suggesting that a murderer is a psychopath?
No you didn't. You just insinuated that anyone looking for reasons beyond what you consider acceptable is criminally racist.Who suggested sweeping anything under the carpet? Certainly not me. The implication is just plain wrong so why do it?
I'll answer this as I think you meant it to read (not justified). It is not just one murder it is a series of murders and a civil war between two branches of the Islam which, paraphrased, says that "thou shalt not kill thy "Good brother" but killing the bad is to be encouraged". It is the systematic rape of thousands of young non Muslim girls in this country, the enslavement and rape of thousands of non Muslim women and girls elsewhere and the systematic murder of non Muslims in the name of Allah which leads me to question the religion of 1.6 billion people. I am not questioning the people but the religion which they uphold.Or was it that you don't like my notion that because somebody murders then a generalisation about 1.6 billion people is justified? Do you really think that? If that isn't racial or religious hatred I don't know what is.
I'm certainly not offended by your linking to anything and I certainly don't reject that message. I don't doubt your adherence to peace and love but I, and many other people here, query your understanding. If you opened your mind and looked at the religion which you refuse to criticise you might actually understand where we are coming from. You show no willingness to even want to understand anything about that of which you are so uncritical.Or were you offended by my linking to an episode of Radio 4's Thought for the Day? I guess the message of peace, love and understanding has often been met with hostility, but that doesn't make it wrong.
For the above reasons and those which I posted in my PM to you I will not retract what I think is a very valid comment. I at least agreed to disagree. I am willing to accept that you have strongly held opinions on the matter and must have good reasons, which you have not disclosed, for holding them. I have openly argued all the reasons why I hold my opinions but you seem to be rejecting my right to hold those opinions. That is what extremism is all about; not allowing anyone to hold opinions which do not uphold the values of those in power. It is Fascism and it is Communism and it is also Islam, but not, from what I have read, Ahmediyya Islam.Now retract your comment as I asked you to earlier in a PM, or that's the end of our discourse.
I would also say that I don't doubt that there are a great majority of Muslims who don't agree with the more extreme elements of their religion but are afraid to publicly announce the fact as they fear just what happened to Asad Shah might then happen to them.