Catweazle wrote:
So, in LibDemSpinSpeak, Lincolnshire will not become smaller, it will just offer more opportunities for fish-farming.
No. In terms of civil engineering and geography, Lincolnshire will not become smaller.
OK, that's not quite true. There 140 acres near Donna Nook that are in the process of 'managed retreat' whereby a saltmarsh habitat is created in accord with the Habitats Directive to mitigate loss of saltmarsh in the Humber Estuary where sea defence works are squeezing that habitat.
There's another area of land around Anderby that is currently designated a 'Coastal Country Park' in which no significant building will be given planning permission. The Environment Agency currently applies a policy of 'hold the line' in this area but retains an option to redesignate this to 'managed retreat' in the second half of this century.
So in a near worst-case sea level rise scenario we could see a further few hundred acres 'lost' from agriculture (and golf courses) and given over to saltmarsh.
Intriguingly, my nearest section of the coastline is an accretionary coast, where sediments brought south by longshore drift are accumulating and the land is actually getting bigger as sea level rises.
But none of this has the remotest relevance to our ability to provide asylum for refugees now.