Banking and money
Moderator: Peak Moderation
- UndercoverElephant
- Posts: 13584
- Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
- Location: UK
OK...could we temporarily forget about Greece for one post and establish how the UK banking system works?
In the UK, if a person goes to a bank to get a mortgage or loan, does the bank lend that person somebody else's savings that have been put into the bank, or is the money electronically created out of nowhere at the point the bank makes the loan?
In the UK, if a person goes to a bank to get a mortgage or loan, does the bank lend that person somebody else's savings that have been put into the bank, or is the money electronically created out of nowhere at the point the bank makes the loan?
-
- Posts: 544
- Joined: 21 Sep 2010, 16:20
John, my friend,come see....johnhemming2 wrote:No. The ECB linked bank has coins, notes and its Target 2 account. It can only settle payments that it has cash for. (mainly on Target 2).UndercoverElephant wrote:OK. So you are in agreement that when a person loans money from a bank, the bank just creates that money electronically, yes? It has nothing to do with anybody-else's savings.
For all that it matters you might as well assume that the banks only really settle payments through Target 2.
The cash has to come from somewhere for this to happen. With Greece it was coming from the ECB as ELA.
Its liquidity (Free cash essentially target 2) comes from deposits, money market transactions, senior bonds, junior bonds, preference shares and common equity.
The balance sheet balances because for every debit entry there is a credit entry. The balance sheet looks at assets and liabilities, but there is also a calculation as to liquidity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I12o_eUOUIM
'Backbench Business
Money Creation and Society'
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/p ... 2048000001
'11.18 am
Steve Baker (Wycombe) (Con): I beg to move,
That this House has considered money creation and society.
The methods of money production in society today are profoundly corrupting in ways that would matter to everyone if they were clearly understood. The essence of this debate is: who should be allowed to create money, how and at whose risk? It is no wonder that it has attracted support from across the political spectrum, although, looking around the Chamber, I think that the Rochester and Strood by-election has perhaps taken its toll. None the less, I am grateful to right hon. and hon. Friends from all political parties, including the hon. Members for Clacton (Douglas Carswell) and for Brighton, Pavilion (Caroline Lucas) and the right hon. Member for Oldham West and Royton (Mr Meacher), for their support in securing this debate.
One of the most memorable quotes about money and banking is usually attributed to Henry Ford:
“It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.”
Let us hope we do not have a revolution, as I feel sure we are all conservatives on that issue.
How is it done? The process is so simple that the mind is repelled. It is this:
“Whenever a bank makes a loan, it simultaneously creates a matching deposit in the borrower’s bank account, thereby creating new money.”
I have been told many times that this is ridiculous, even by one employee who had previously worked for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation of the United States. The explanation is taken from the Bank of England article “Money creation in the modern economy”, and it seems to me it is rather hard to dismiss'.
Sorry UE, missed previous two posts~
-
- Posts: 2159
- Joined: 30 Jun 2015, 22:01
There are different definitions of money. However, if you take Steve Baker's example for the bank concerned to actually pay out the credit balance that is created by the mortgage agreement there needs to be liquidity (which comes from somewhere else and is not created by a clearing bank - it is created by the central bank).
This is the narrow money supply M0 which is the cash outside the BoE and banks' operational accounts with the BoE. That is for England.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_sup ... ed_Kingdom
Personally I think the broader measures can be misleading as they do not take into account commercial credit. They look at the gross credit balances ignoring the debit balances.
M1 is the EZ equivalent.
This is the narrow money supply M0 which is the cash outside the BoE and banks' operational accounts with the BoE. That is for England.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_sup ... ed_Kingdom
Personally I think the broader measures can be misleading as they do not take into account commercial credit. They look at the gross credit balances ignoring the debit balances.
M1 is the EZ equivalent.
- UndercoverElephant
- Posts: 13584
- Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
- Location: UK
I am so talking to a politician.johnhemming2 wrote:There are different definitions of money. However, if you take Steve Baker's example for the bank concerned to actually pay out the credit balance that is created by the mortgage agreement there needs to be liquidity (which comes from somewhere else and is not created by a clearing bank - it is created by the central bank).
This is the narrow money supply M0 which is the cash outside the BoE and banks' operational accounts with the BoE. That is for England.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_sup ... ed_Kingdom
Personally I think the broader measures can be misleading as they do not take into account commercial credit.
M1 is the EZ equivalent.
http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publicat ... eation.pdf
In the modern economy, most money takes the form of bank
deposits. But how those bank deposits are created is often
misunderstood: the principal way is through commercial
banks making loans.
Whenever a bank makes a loan, it
simultaneously creates a matching deposit in the
borrower’s bank account, thereby creating new money
-
- Posts: 2159
- Joined: 30 Jun 2015, 22:01
It remains, however, that for the bank to pay away the credit balance to someone else (at another bank) it has to have the liquidity. (ie the M0/M1 sort of money).
There are two transactions. The first transaction creates a commercial loan. The second one pays away the credit balance. The second is constrained by liquidity. Otherwise why have the Greek banks had any problem if they can simply create money. They can create as many deposits with matching debit accounts as they wish, but they are limited as to what they can pay to other banks.
There are two transactions. The first transaction creates a commercial loan. The second one pays away the credit balance. The second is constrained by liquidity. Otherwise why have the Greek banks had any problem if they can simply create money. They can create as many deposits with matching debit accounts as they wish, but they are limited as to what they can pay to other banks.
-
- Posts: 544
- Joined: 21 Sep 2010, 16:20
John, it's ok to be wrong, it's a learning process.johnhemming2 wrote:There are different definitions of money. However, if you take Steve Baker's example for the bank concerned to actually pay out the credit balance that is created by the mortgage agreement there needs to be liquidity (which comes from somewhere else and is not created by a clearing bank - it is created by the central bank).
This is the narrow money supply M0 which is the cash outside the BoE and banks' operational accounts with the BoE. That is for England.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_sup ... ed_Kingdom
Personally I think the broader measures can be misleading as they do not take into account commercial credit. They look at the gross credit balances ignoring the debit balances.
M1 is the EZ equivalent.
-
- Posts: 544
- Joined: 21 Sep 2010, 16:20
Greece is beholden, in terms of sovereignty to the ECB...and others, but.....you know this.johnhemming2 wrote:It remains, however, that for the bank to pay away the credit balance to someone else (at another bank) it has to have the liquidity. (ie the M0/M1 sort of money).
There are two transactions. The first transaction creates a commercial loan. The second one pays away the credit balance. The second is constrained by liquidity. Otherwise why have the Greek banks had any problem if they can simply create money. They can create as many deposits with matching debit accounts as they wish, but they are limited as to what they can pay to other banks.
John, stop.
-
- Posts: 2159
- Joined: 30 Jun 2015, 22:01
-
- Posts: 2159
- Joined: 30 Jun 2015, 22:01
-
- Posts: 544
- Joined: 21 Sep 2010, 16:20
I've given up trying to answer that one. Now just pursuing a life-strategy around trying to need as little of it as possible (whatever "it" is!)peaceful_life wrote:John, as far as you're aware, what IS money?...in your opinion.johnhemming2 wrote:Clearing banks can only create broad money. The cannot create narrow money. It is narrow money that is needed for liquidity.
Engage in geo-engineering. Plant a tree today.
-
- Posts: 544
- Joined: 21 Sep 2010, 16:20
Based on the irony that you've now afforded yourself the head-space to feel so indifferent to it, temporarily.Tarrel wrote:I've given up trying to answer that one. Now just pursuing a life-strategy around trying to need as little of it as possible (whatever "it" is!)peaceful_life wrote:John, as far as you're aware, what IS money?...in your opinion.johnhemming2 wrote:Clearing banks can only create broad money. The cannot create narrow money. It is narrow money that is needed for liquidity.
Breath brother....and think a while, people and planet are suffering for this shit.
Did you test the nitrogen levels from the gorse decomposition btw?
- UndercoverElephant
- Posts: 13584
- Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
- Location: UK
John, I'd suggest you watch this video which will help you to appreciate how money works.