Please help me improve this peak oil article

Forum for general discussion of Peak Oil / Oil depletion; also covering related subjects

Moderator: Peak Moderation

User avatar
UndercoverElephant
Posts: 13523
Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
Location: UK

Please help me improve this peak oil article

Post by UndercoverElephant »

Transition Town Hastings is currently being brought back from the dead. I am involved (obviously), and I'm also involved in the production of a free community newspaper called the Hastings Independent (http://hastingsindependentpress.co.uk/)

I'm doing a 1000-word introduction to peak oil and the TT movement, to go in the paper. Any feedback, criticism or suggestions for improvements are most welcome:
Transition Town Hastings: Whatever happened to Peak Oil?

Transition Town Hastings has been rebooted, but what, exactly is a "Transition Town" (TT)? The "transition" in question is the huge economic and social changes associated with an expected deterioration and eventual collapse of the wider global/national economic systems in the wake of Peak Oil. But what is Peak Oil?

Firstly it is important to note that petroleum is the single most important raw material in existence. It's used for transport fuels, heating and electricity generation, and for the production of plastics and a vast array of other synthetic chemicals, including lubricants, paint, pharmaceuticals and the fertilisers and pesticides that allow us to grow enough food to feed 7+ billion people. And it is irreplaceable - without access to a regular supply of affordable oil, civilisation as we know it would surely collapse, which is why it is so geo-politically important.

In 1956, US geologist M. King Hubbert predicted that production of conventional oil in the lower 48 states would peak between 1965 and 1970. His theory was based on the fact that the amount of oil in the ground is limited, that the largest oil fields were the easiest to find - and therefore, on average, found earlier - and that there was a predictable path of development and bell-shaped production curve for any one field or region. He was widely ridiculed, especially by the oil industry.

Production in the lower 48 peaked in 1970, and the effects on the US included the loss of the Vietnam war and effective national bankruptcy. After WWII, the US had imposed a global monetary system whereby the US dollar would be the sole international currency, but that dollars would be convertible into gold. In 1971, with the US teetering on the verge of a default and foreign governments demanding gold for dollars, President Nixon was forced to permanently end this convertibility, ushering in an era of purely "fiat" money (which is itself looking increasingly unstable).

At the turn of the century, Peak Oil theorists were predicting global production would peak around 2010, followed by dramatic price increases and economic collapse. But here we are in 2015, and after a decade of high (but not astronomical) prices, oil is back down to $60 a barrel. So what happened? Was the theory wrong?

The theorists got several things wrong. They seriously underestimated the level of "demand destruction", which basically means people responding to rising prices by choosing to use less of the stuff - especially drivers in the US. They also failed to predict the global monetary/debt crisis that started in 2008. This was an accident waiting to happen, thanks to irresponsible lending by banks and a property price bubble, but it was the rising price of oil in 2008 that triggered the bubble to burst. However, the resulting economic chaos caused a global depression, which further lowered demand for oil, and kept prices under control. These factors bought some time, and the oil industry responded by a massive development of unconventional oil production- especially the environmentally-disastrous Canadian tar sands, and now the US "fracking" boom. It has also led to exploration for oil in increasingly remote and environmentally-sensitive areas, such as the Arctic.

This unconventional oil costs more to get at, but its production is seen as a threat to the market share and power of the sole conventional producer which still has spare capacity: Saudi Arabia. One might have expected the Saudis could have responded to falling prices by cutting production, but they surprised everybody by doing the opposite - causing further drops in the price. Presumably, this strategy is designed to destabilise the unconventional oil industry, which depends on high prices to be profitable. The goal is to make potential investors in unconventional oil projects sufficiently worried about future price fluctuations that they choose to invest in something less risky. And it is working: just look, for example, at the huge hole that falling oil prices have left in the SNP's plans to base an independent Scotland's economic future on harder-to-get-at oil in the North Sea.

So where does this leave us? Unfortunately, despite all the opposition from environmentalists, fracking looks like it is here to stay. It won't, however, last forever. A recent study has suggested that production from fracking in the US will itself peak in 2020, and given that global production from conventional fields is already in decline, we are looking at a peak in total (conventional and unconventional) global production about the same time or soon after.

Peak Oil hasn't gone away. The current period of slightly lower oil prices is a temporary phenomenon and the monetary/economic problems triggered by the last spike in prices have not been fixed. They have merely been hidden by 7 years of "printing" of fiat currency and ultra-low interest rates, in order to re-inflate the property and stock market bubbles that burst in 2008.

In short, the crisis predicted by the Peak Oil theorists - the "transition" of the Transition Town movement - is still on its way. It has merely been delayed for a decade or so by a global depression, a temporary boom in environmentally-catastrophic unconventional production and the implementation of "fantasy economics". The result (and the true purpose) of that fantasy economic system is to transfer as much wealth as possible into the hands of the already-wealthy, before the harsh realities of peak oil start to hit home in the 2020s. And I haven't even mentioned climate change, population overshoot, deforestation, soil depletion, collapse of fishery stocks and all the rest of inter-linked crises our civilisation is on a collision course with. The "migrant crisis" making so many headlines at the moment is not a temporary blip: it is the start of something much bigger and far worse.

Are you ready for what is to come? The time to start preparing, for yourself, your family, your community and your town, is now.

Transition Town Hastings can be found online at http://www.transitiontownhastings.org.uk/ and on facebook at https://www.facebook.com/groups/3181364 ... 0/?fref=ts
User avatar
adam2
Site Admin
Posts: 10939
Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 17:49
Location: North Somerset, twinned with Atlantis

Post by adam2 »

I would remove the reference to the war in Vietnam. Whilst the USA did indeed lose the war, I doubt that the peaking of USA oil production was to blame. Oil was still cheap and plentiful.
"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"
User avatar
UndercoverElephant
Posts: 13523
Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
Location: UK

Post by UndercoverElephant »

OK - I'll change that bit. Peaking US production didn't lose them the war, but the war was a huge expense and combined with internal US peak oil to trigger the "default" in 1971 when Nixon de-linked the dollar and gold.
User avatar
adam2
Site Admin
Posts: 10939
Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 17:49
Location: North Somerset, twinned with Atlantis

Post by adam2 »

I would also remove the reference to oil being used for electricity production.
Only a tiny, and falling, percentage of UK grid electricity comes from oil, less than 1%.
Natural gas, coal, nuclear, and increasingly wind are the main sources of UK electricity.

We do import a fair bit of electricity, but not from countries that burn significant oil for electricity production.

It might be worth adding that although natural gas can often be used in place of oil, that natural gas is subject to broadly similar as constraints as is oil. North sea natural gas peaked some years ago.

If space permits it might be worth adding that oil is still being discovered, but that the rate of new discoveries is much less than consumption.
(this would counter the argument that more oil exploration will solve our problems)
"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14814
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

Well written. Good luck with it.

A minor niggle for me is the use of the words 'theory' and 'theorists'. The peak of extraction a finite resource at some point cannot be a theory. But it's your article. 8)

If I had my sub-editor's (peaked) cap on, I could save you at least a couple of dozen words - if 1,000 is your absolute limit. For instance, the phrase 'One might have expected' in the seventh paragraph is redundant, given that they surprise everyone in the same breath. :lol:
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
User avatar
UndercoverElephant
Posts: 13523
Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
Location: UK

Post by UndercoverElephant »

emordnilap wrote: A minor niggle for me is the use of the words 'theory' and 'theorists'. The peak of extraction a finite resource at some point cannot be a theory. But it's your article.
I understand the complaint, but "theory" here doesn't just refer to the idea of peak oil itself, but to its consequences. For example, nearly everybody, pre-2008, was predicting a huge and permanent hike in oil prices. They got the demand destruction wrong - one of the economic bits of peak oil theory was wrong.
User avatar
PS_RalphW
Posts: 6974
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Cambridge

Post by PS_RalphW »

Rockman, an oil driller and geologist over at the peakoil.com uses the phrase 'peak oil dynamic' to encompass the slow train crash of ever more expensive to extract oil gutting the global economy and killing demand and a downwards spiral.

A bit like climate change being the new term for global warming.
Little John

Post by Little John »

Outstanding UE.

That's a fine and concise summery of where we are
User avatar
UndercoverElephant
Posts: 13523
Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
Location: UK

Post by UndercoverElephant »

adam2 wrote:I would also remove the reference to oil being used for electricity production.
Only a tiny, and falling, percentage of UK grid electricity comes from oil, less than 1%.
Natural gas, coal, nuclear, and increasingly wind are the main sources of UK electricity.

We do import a fair bit of electricity, but not from countries that burn significant oil for electricity production.

It might be worth adding that although natural gas can often be used in place of oil, that natural gas is subject to broadly similar as constraints as is oil. North sea natural gas peaked some years ago.

If space permits it might be worth adding that oil is still being discovered, but that the rate of new discoveries is much less than consumption.
(this would counter the argument that more oil exploration will solve our problems)
OK thanks. I've amended it.
User avatar
UndercoverElephant
Posts: 13523
Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
Location: UK

Post by UndercoverElephant »

Little John wrote:Outstanding UE.

That's a fine and concise summery of where we are
thx :-)
User avatar
clv101
Site Admin
Posts: 10574
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Contact:

Post by clv101 »

A agree with Adam about electricity and Vietnam.

I'd replace the first 'theory' with "His analysis was based on..."

I'd leave this out: They seriously underestimated the level of "demand destruction"
Peak oil theorists don't have much to say about the demand-side at all, peak oil is a supply-side issue. In any case, globally there hasn't been much demand destruction. Demand and production are up. What there's been is a shift in demand from west to east, but that's nothing to do with 'peak oil'.

In my opinion the thing the peak oil theorists seriously underestimated was the achievable unconventional flow rate. Absolutely no one in ASPO 8-10 yrs ago thought we'd be getting literally millions of barrels per day from tight oil within the decade. Conventional oil has declined much as projected. I agree the financial crash bought the time needed to bring this new supply on-line, thus avoiding the oil supply pinch.

On fracking - I don't think it's going to happen in any large scale outside the US anytime soon and I doubt they'll be much more growth now. There's a load of things that uniquely come together in the US from mineral rights, local infrastructure availability, finance and geography and geology... This just isn't the case in Europe, Far East or anywhere else really.
Little John

Post by Little John »

I wouldn't leave out the bit about demand destruction, since demand destruction has arguably played a significant part in the reason why prices have lowered and stayed low, as least thus far. But, I do agree this might be better phrased as saying that peak oil theorists did not take into account the importance of demand destruction. This is nit picking though,
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14814
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

It's good, though, UE - well done. I think this is the most important bit:
In short, the crisis predicted by the Peak Oil theorists - the "transition" of the Transition Town movement - is still on its way. It has merely been delayed for a decade or so by a global depression, a temporary boom in environmentally-catastrophic unconventional production and the implementation of "fantasy economics". The result (and the true purpose) of that fantasy economic system is to transfer as much wealth as possible into the hands of the already-wealthy, before the harsh realities of peak oil start to hit home in the 2020s. And I haven't even mentioned climate change, population overshoot, deforestation, soil depletion, collapse of fishery stocks and all the rest of inter-linked crises our civilisation is on a collision course with. The "migrant crisis" making so many headlines at the moment is not a temporary blip: it is the start of something much bigger and far worse.

Are you ready for what is to come? The time to start preparing, for yourself, your family, your community and your town, is now.
Shame it has to come at the end. :wink:
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
User avatar
UndercoverElephant
Posts: 13523
Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
Location: UK

Post by UndercoverElephant »

Cheers for the feedback everybody - I have incorporated a lot of the suggestions.

I don't supposed anybody can suggest a picture or diagram to go with the article? I'd need it to be quite hi-res and free to use.
User avatar
UndercoverElephant
Posts: 13523
Joined: 10 Mar 2008, 00:00
Location: UK

Post by UndercoverElephant »

emordnilap wrote:
Shame it has to come at the end. :wink:
There will be future articles about what it means to people's everyday lives and what TT Hastings is attempting to do. But you've got to start at the beginning, and that means trying to get people to understand the nature and severity of the crisis that is coming. It's early days. The group is just assembling itself - only had two meetings so far.

"Finished" version, if you're interested...
Transition Town Hastings: Whatever happened to Peak Oil?

Transition Town Hastings has been rebooted, but what, exactly, is a "Transition Town"? The "transition" in question is the huge economic and social changes associated with an expected deterioration and eventual collapse of global/national economic systems in the wake of Peak Oil. But what is Peak Oil?

Firstly it is important to note that for the modern world, petroleum is the most important natural resource bar none. It is of key importance as fuel for transportation, and as the raw material for the production of all plastics and a vast array of other synthetic chemicals, including lubricants, paint, pharmaceuticals and the fertilisers and pesticides that make it possible to grow enough food to feed 7+ billion people. It is irreplaceable; without access to a regular supply of affordable oil, civilisation as we know it cannot continue.

In 1956, US geologist M. King Hubbert predicted that production of oil in the lower 48 states would peak between 1965 and 1970. His analysis was based on the fact that the amount of oil in the ground is finite, that the largest oil fields are the easiest to find - and therefore, on average, found earlier - and that there is a predictable path of development and a bell-shaped production curve for any one field or region. He was widely ridiculed, especially by the oil industry.

Production in the lower 48 peaked in 1970, and this, combined with cost of the Vietnam war, pushed the US towards national bankruptcy. After WWII, the US had imposed a global monetary system whereby the dollar would be the sole international currency, but that dollars would be convertible into gold. In 1971, with the US teetering on the verge of default and foreign governments demanding gold for their dollars, President Nixon was forced to permanently end this convertibility, ushering in an era of purely "fiat" money (which is itself looking increasingly unstable). By 1973, the US was at the mercy of OPEC, with serious consequences.

At the turn of the century, Peak Oil theorists were predicting the global peak around 2010, followed by dramatic price increases and economic collapse. But here we are in 2015, and after a decade of high (but not astronomical) prices, oil is back down to $60 a barrel. Was the theory wrong?

Many people seriously underestimated the level of "demand destruction", which basically means people responding to rising prices by choosing (or being forced) to use less of the stuff. They also failed to predict the global monetary/debt crisis that started in 2008. That was an accident waiting to happen, due to irresponsible lending by banks and a property price bubble, but it was the rising oil price in 2008 that burst that bubble. A global depression followed, lowering demand further. These factors bought some time for the oil industry to respond with major development of unconventional production such as the Canadian tar sands and the US "fracking" boom, and the speed of development of this unconventional production was also underestimated. Exploration for oil in increasingly remote and environmentally-sensitive areas, such as the Arctic and deep water ("conventional production" but from unconventional locations), has also expanded.

This unconventional oil (UO) costs more to get at but its production is seen as a threat to the market share and power of the sole conventional producer which still has spare capacity: Saudi Arabia. The Saudis could have responded to falling prices by cutting production, but they surprised everybody by doing the opposite - causing further drops in the price. This is a strategy designed to destabilise the UO industry. The goal is to make potential investors in UO projects sufficiently worried about future price fluctuations that they choose to invest in something less risky. And it is working: just look, for example, at the huge hole that falling oil prices have left in the SNP's plans to base an independent Scotland's economic future on harder-to-get-at oil in the North Sea.

We have now entered a phase that has been called a "Peak Oil Dynamic": unstable oil prices slowly "sawing" upwards. At the high end of their range (over $140 a barrel), UO is profitable, but the global economy is slowly strangled. At the low end (about $60), the economy starts to recover but UO is unprofitable. Both ends of the range will rise over time, while production and consumption falls, and the population continues to grow. The long-term effect will be a decline in investment in increasingly expensive future oil production, and increasing economic, then political, instability.

So where does this leave us? Unfortunately, despite all the opposition from environmentalists, fracking looks like it is here to stay. It won't, however, last forever, and is unlikely to take off in other parts of the world like it has in the US. A recent study has suggested that production from fracking in the US will itself peak in 2020, and given that global production from conventional fields is already in decline, we are looking at a peak in total (conventional and unconventional) global production soon after. Lower oil prices are temporary and the monetary/economic problems triggered by the last spike in prices have not been fixed. They have merely been hidden by seven years of ultra-low interest rates and "printing" fiat currency, re-inflating the burst asset bubbles.

The crisis predicted by the Peak Oil theorists - and the Transition - is still coming. It has just been delayed for a decade or so by a global depression, a temporary boom in environmentally-catastrophic unconventional production and the implementation of fantasy economics. The true purpose of that fantasy economic system is to transfer as much wealth as possible into the hands of the already-wealthy, before the harsh realities of peak oil start to hit home in the 2020s. And I haven't even mentioned climate change, population overshoot, deforestation, soil depletion, collapsing fisheries and all the rest of inter-linked crises our civilisation is on a collision course with. The "migrant crisis" making so many headlines at the moment is not temporary, but the start of something much bigger and far worse.

Are you ready for what is coming? The time to start preparing, for yourself, your family, your community and your town, is now.

Transition Town Hastings can be found online at http://www.transitiontownhastings.org.uk/ and on facebook at https://www.facebook.com/groups/3181364 ... 0/?fref=ts
Post Reply