Current Oil Price
Moderator: Peak Moderation
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14290
- Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
- Location: Newbury, Berkshire
- Contact:
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
Loan charges are still there where or not you pump (until you declare bankruptcy). Yes yes of course there are costs, I just doubt that they add up to much compared to oil at ~$50. There's a little oilfield near my house that nods away at maybe 50 barrels per day. That's $2500 per day. A lorry comes every few days to carry the stuff off. There'll be some maintenance but there's nobody on site most of the time. Still seems a nice little earner.
-
- Posts: 823
- Joined: 08 Nov 2010, 00:09
-
- Posts: 823
- Joined: 08 Nov 2010, 00:09
Given the tradition of keeping their kings on life support long after brain function has ceased, I would expect that the succession was agreed months ago and current oil price policy will not change at all. I wouldn't surprised if the new king decided the production hold leading to the current price falls. He is more hard line Islamic than the previous one, which is to say even more of a hypocrite.
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14815
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
A realistic take on America's butcher ally.
And Glen Greenwald's take, highlighting the hypocritical gulf in the western reactions to a democratically-elected leader's death and that of a vicious dictator.
It's not yet time to 'bring democracy' to Saudi Arabia. But their turn will come.Given the foundations upon which American-Saudi ties rest, its unlikely that the relationship will be drastically altered by the passing of King Abdullah and the succession of his brother Prince Salman. Regardless of how venal, reckless, or brutal his government may choose to be, as long as it protects American interests in the Middle East it will inevitably be showered with plaudits and support, just as its predecessor was.
And Glen Greenwald's take, highlighting the hypocritical gulf in the western reactions to a democratically-elected leader's death and that of a vicious dictator.
One obvious difference between the two leaders was that Chávez was elected and Abdullah was not. Another is that Chávez used the nation’s oil resources to attempt to improve the lives of the nation’s most improverished while Abdullah used his to further enrich Saudi oligarchs and western elites. Another is that the severity of Abdullah’s human rights abuses and militarism makes Chávez look in comparison like Gandhi.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
I read a potted summary of the Saudi Royal politics over at peakoil.com
suggesting that SA are in a bit of panic about the near civil war in Yemen, where AQ are gaining ground again among the Sunni tribal leaders. The new king is said to have advancing senility which makes him a very shaky hand on the tiller - but he is said to be putting feelers out to bring the Muslim Brotherhood in from the cold, after they were kicked out by a SA backed coup in Egypt.
Without oil money coming in, I guess they can't afford to keep paying the Egyptian food import bills for ever.
suggesting that SA are in a bit of panic about the near civil war in Yemen, where AQ are gaining ground again among the Sunni tribal leaders. The new king is said to have advancing senility which makes him a very shaky hand on the tiller - but he is said to be putting feelers out to bring the Muslim Brotherhood in from the cold, after they were kicked out by a SA backed coup in Egypt.
Without oil money coming in, I guess they can't afford to keep paying the Egyptian food import bills for ever.
-
- Posts: 823
- Joined: 08 Nov 2010, 00:09
-
- Posts: 823
- Joined: 08 Nov 2010, 00:09
-
- Posts: 6595
- Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 22:14
- Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont
Greece becomes a problem if they do an Iceland and start bankrupting the bankers. They 'owe' a lot of money, and if they walk away from the repayments schedule other countries might elect new governments with a similar approach. The big question for the new government is how well they get to grips with cleaning out the corruption in their own systems. All of politics is compromise, and the more radical the movement, the quicker they can come unstuck when faced with establishment stonewalling.
The alternative is the Iraqi solution - sack the lot at the point of a gun and wait for the armed insurrection.
The alternative is the Iraqi solution - sack the lot at the point of a gun and wait for the armed insurrection.
-
- Posts: 823
- Joined: 08 Nov 2010, 00:09
$200 a barrel oil? I thought that $140-plus was too expensive last time.....
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/news ... slump.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/news ... slump.html