next, the Nobel peace prize?
Moderator: Peak Moderation
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14814
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
next, the Nobel peace prize?
Well, O'Bomber got it, so why not take it to beyond irony?
Tony Blair gets 'philanthropist of the year' award
Tony Blair gets 'philanthropist of the year' award
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14814
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
Re: next, the Nobel peace prize?
I assume you all heard about TB's latest PR 'achievement'. I couldn't be bothered mentioning it because obviously such awards have now reached a level of debasement that they're less than worthless.emordnilap wrote:Well, O'Bomber got it, so why not take it to beyond irony?
Tony Blair gets 'philanthropist of the year' award
However, it's good that people have decided to air their disgust: please sign.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
Re: next, the Nobel peace prize?
Isn't it amazing what they can do with Teflon these days?emordnilap wrote: Tony Blair gets 'philanthropist of the year' award
Here's the 'official' response from 'The Office of Tony Blair':
http://www.tonyblairoffice.org/news/ent ... acy-award/
-
- Posts: 6595
- Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 22:14
- Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
That's not so far from the truth.vtsnowedin wrote:Now, now, be careful. The USA'S NSA monitors all internet posts including ones from Wales.Catweazle wrote:I have a soft spot for Tony Blair, it's where the field levels out near the hedge, very easy to dig.
http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/ ... nt-too-far
See below for an excellent article outlining the historical events leading us to where we currently are.
http://limpidus.org/2014/08/18/ukrainia ... he-dollar/
I'm not in Wales, I'm in a country very similar to Wales ( and actually surrounded by Wales ), but I have unilaterally declared independence from the UK since I found some shale in the garden.vtsnowedin wrote:Now, now, be careful. The USA'S NSA monitors all internet posts including ones from Wales.Catweazle wrote:I have a soft spot for Tony Blair, it's where the field levels out near the hedge, very easy to dig.
Have you formed a government yet? If so, would you like to elaborate on your energy policy?Catweazle wrote:I'm not in Wales, I'm in a country very similar to Wales ( and actually surrounded by Wales ), but I have unilaterally declared independence from the UK since I found some shale in the garden.vtsnowedin wrote:Now, now, be careful. The USA'S NSA monitors all internet posts including ones from Wales.Catweazle wrote:I have a soft spot for Tony Blair, it's where the field levels out near the hedge, very easy to dig.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14287
- Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
- Location: Newbury, Berkshire
- Contact:
The problem is not the US having the dollar but all the other people who have it. It's them who want to keep the dollar going until such times as they can off load their holding, China especially. That's why they are going round the world giving dollars away to build projects to influence governments and also buying up as many hard assets as they can.stevecook172001 wrote:http://limpidus.org/2014/08/18/ukrainia ... he-dollar/
If it was just the US who held the dollar it, and the US, would have gone down the drain long ago. Or the US might have been a lot more stingey with its spending and not made war on so many other nations; they wouldn't have had to go into Iraq because Saddam was threatening the dollar hegemony by selling oil for other currencies.
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
-
- Posts: 6595
- Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 22:14
- Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont
Ken I think you underestimate the size and strength of the USA economy. The holders of US dollars hold them because they are the most likely currency to retain a significant share of value if a world wide economic event occurs.kenneal - lagger wrote:The problem is not the US having the dollar but all the other people who have it. It's them who want to keep the dollar going until such times as they can off load their holding, China especially. That's why they are going round the world giving dollars away to build projects to influence governments and also buying up as many hard assets as they can.stevecook172001 wrote:http://limpidus.org/2014/08/18/ukrainia ... he-dollar/
If it was just the US who held the dollar it, and the US, would have gone down the drain long ago. Or the US might have been a lot more stingey with its spending and not made war on so many other nations; they wouldn't have had to go into Iraq because Saddam was threatening the dollar hegemony by selling oil for other currencies.
They hold them because of fear of of an implied and actual military threat by the USA to anyone who dares not to hold them. The dollar used to be backed by gold, but now it is merely backed by men with guns and the fear that engenders. But, times change, eventually, and so does the fear.vtsnowedin wrote:Ken I think you underestimate the size and strength of the USA economy. The holders of US dollars hold them because they are the most likely currency to retain a significant share of value if a world wide economic event occurs.kenneal - lagger wrote:The problem is not the US having the dollar but all the other people who have it. It's them who want to keep the dollar going until such times as they can off load their holding, China especially. That's why they are going round the world giving dollars away to build projects to influence governments and also buying up as many hard assets as they can.stevecook172001 wrote:http://limpidus.org/2014/08/18/ukrainia ... he-dollar/
If it was just the US who held the dollar it, and the US, would have gone down the drain long ago. Or the US might have been a lot more stingey with its spending and not made war on so many other nations; they wouldn't have had to go into Iraq because Saddam was threatening the dollar hegemony by selling oil for other currencies.