Sure and I think the NFU only represent 18% of UK farmers, granted...the largest and wealthiest 18%, let's be mindful of generalisations.biffvernon wrote:Indeed - but some of the cereal farmers round my way are very rich!
flood watch
Moderator: Peak Moderation
-
- Posts: 544
- Joined: 21 Sep 2010, 16:20
-
- Posts: 6595
- Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 22:14
- Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont
Oh he might be up on it but he is not going to beat a dry land wheat farmer in Kansas at it.peaceful_life wrote:['The U.S. has 36 million acres of lawn and 35 million acres housing and feeding recreational horses. That's 71 million acres, which is enough to feed the entire country without a single farm or ranch'
Are you suggesting that, Sepp Holzer, isn't up to scratch with erosion and water management?
71 million acres of lawns and horse pasture? Well you have to do something with it and we have 938 million acres of farmland for the farmers to tend to.
-
- Posts: 4124
- Joined: 06 Apr 2009, 22:45
-
- Posts: 544
- Joined: 21 Sep 2010, 16:20
I think he already has, as has, Geoff lawton, in the Jordan valley...vtsnowedin wrote:Oh he might be up on it but he is not going to beat a dry land wheat farmer in Kansas at it.peaceful_life wrote:['The U.S. has 36 million acres of lawn and 35 million acres housing and feeding recreational horses. That's 71 million acres, which is enough to feed the entire country without a single farm or ranch'
Are you suggesting that, Sepp Holzer, isn't up to scratch with erosion and water management?
71 million acres of lawns and horse pasture? Well you have to do something with it and we have 938 million acres of farmland for the farmers to tend to.
http://permaculturenews.org/2013/12/10/ ... nsultancy/
PA Yeomans, had the nut cracked years ago.
http://www.yeomansplow.com.au/p-a-yeomans.htm
http://permaculturenews.org/2012/06/30/ ... ine-scale/
The method can handle the scale.
Perahps it's not correct to be growing that amount of wheat in the manner it's being grown, or that amount at all, either way...the land is being tended in the wrong way and it's clearly demonstrable what can be done with it, all of it.
-
- Posts: 544
- Joined: 21 Sep 2010, 16:20
Great point and there are methods of being productive whilst encouraging an increase in biodiversity, indeed...the methods require it and yes...it would give breathing space to allow swathes of land to totally rewild also.woodburner wrote:Why do you have to do something with 71 million acres? You could leave it alone and allow the otherwise displaced and/or persecuted species some living space.
-
- Posts: 6595
- Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 22:14
- Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont
8)Here is a bit of what your up against.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVVktzvCF50
And the harvest later.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGRM1yahPVw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVVktzvCF50
And the harvest later.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGRM1yahPVw
-
- Posts: 544
- Joined: 21 Sep 2010, 16:20
Nahh.....all of that is up against the laws of physics, climatic governance and certain degradation that will kill us all, it's just a temporary thing with the vroom vroom toys and market systems of scale, it either changes to suit the facts or the fact will change it.vtsnowedin wrote:8)Here is a bit of what your up against.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVVktzvCF50
And the harvest later.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGRM1yahPVw
Still got be thankful for small mercies and appreciate the fact that some never bought into it and can now present us with demonstrable equilibrium, nice of them eh?
Am I naive enough to think the industry will change through choice?...certainly not.
Anyhooo...grab yerself a copy of 'water for every farm' by PA Yeomans.
-
- Posts: 4124
- Joined: 06 Apr 2009, 22:45
-
- Posts: 6595
- Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 22:14
- Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont
They have found more then 4000 uses for corn. They range from chicken feed to plastics but my favorite is Bourbon whiskey.woodburner wrote:Hmm, and isn't the crop used for high fructose corn syrup, and consequently turn a large proportion into Michelin men?
Better use the land for wildlife if that's the case.
-
- Posts: 544
- Joined: 21 Sep 2010, 16:20
Excellent, so at least you can use one to numb out the other 3,999+ then, happy daze.vtsnowedin wrote:They have found more then 4000 uses for corn. They range from chicken feed to plastics but my favorite is Bourbon whiskey.woodburner wrote:Hmm, and isn't the crop used for high fructose corn syrup, and consequently turn a large proportion into Michelin men?
Better use the land for wildlife if that's the case.
- RenewableCandy
- Posts: 12777
- Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
- Location: York
-
- Posts: 544
- Joined: 21 Sep 2010, 16:20
-
- Posts: 6595
- Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 22:14
- Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont
If you’re suggesting that I'm a paid shill for the corporate big Ag or corn industry you have it dead wrong. As to the ecological illiteracy jab, not jumping feet first into the permaculture religion is not evidence of illiteracy.peaceful_life wrote:Not if you've got shares in over 4000 products and ecologically illiterate, it's a great gig.RenewableCandy wrote:Wheat is over-rated.
Understanding that the human population is in overshoot and will crash shows that I comprehend the ecology of the planet quite well don't you think?
-
- Posts: 6595
- Joined: 07 Jan 2011, 22:14
- Location: New England ,Chelsea Vermont
-
- Posts: 544
- Joined: 21 Sep 2010, 16:20
Now ya see, ya should of just stopped at the 'if' bit, because from there on in it's pure assumption.vtsnowedin wrote:If you’re suggesting that I'm a paid shill for the corporate big Ag or corn industry you have it dead wrong. As to the ecological illiteracy jab, not jumping feet first into the permaculture religion is not evidence of illiteracy.peaceful_life wrote:Not if you've got shares in over 4000 products and ecologically illiterate, it's a great gig.RenewableCandy wrote:Wheat is over-rated.
Understanding that the human population is in overshoot and will crash shows that I comprehend the ecology of the planet quite well don't you think?
I'm just putting forward some demonstrable facts that happen to refute a lot of what you've written. If you want to describe these methods that work in a pejorative manner and whittle things down to a simplistic dilemma of numbers I think you'd be missing bigger points.