MBA thesis on peak oil

Forum for general discussion of Peak Oil / Oil depletion; also covering related subjects

Moderator: Peak Moderation

Post Reply
User avatar
clv101
Site Admin
Posts: 10576
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Contact:

MBA thesis on peak oil

Post by clv101 »

I found this on my stumbling through the web. It's an MBA thesis on peak oil titled:

STRATEGIC CHOICES FOR MANAGING THE TRANSITION FROM PEAK OIL TO A REDUCED PETROLEUM ECONOMY

Written June 06 by a geologist.

http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~odland/Od ... tation.pdf


I haven't read all 130 pages. Here's the conclusion:
It is by now obvious that world oil production faces serious constraints to expanding.
Exploration and refining infrastructure is operating at capacity, yet it may not be profitable to
invest in capital expansion. New oil discoveries have not offset the yearly depletion of existing
fields since the 1980?s. Whether or not world oil production will peak in 2005 or 2025 is not the
critical question; we have already rolled over to a sellers? market because demand exceeds the
rate at which oil can be supplied. With little sign of demand abatement from the US or Europe
and skyrocketing demand from China and India, we are drawing down the capital of our oil
endowment at an alarming rate. From this point onwards, we can expect supply disruptions,
price spikes, and oil shocks.

The petroleum-based world economy has therefore reached a tipping point. Fierce
competition for the remaining oil resources will increasingly drive the markets, as well as
national and foreign policies. The strategic choices we make now about how the 2nd half of the
world?s oil should be used will determine how violently and abruptly we descend Hubbert?s
Peak.

Since a finite resource problem cannot ultimately be solved from the supply side, we
must use every tool at our disposal to reduce demand and develop substitute energy sources.
Market pricing and oil shocks will undoubtedly play a significant role in demand destruction in
the long run. But market solutions will exacerbate distribution inequity and political unrest by
excluding all but the wealthy from oil. Cogent government energy policies to allocate oil and
reduce demand will be required. The most effective are likely to include combinations of nonprice
rationing, fuel consumption taxes, and incentives for conservation and alternative energy
use.

However, the biggest hurdle to overcome in reducing oil consumption is human nature.
Denial is the first recourse, followed by a fighting instinct to preserve the status quo.
Cataclysmic perceptual and behavioral shifts will be required before individuals voluntarily
reduce their oil consumption. Education and discussion of the issues surrounding peak oil are
crucial if we are to manage our inevitable transition away from fossil fuels with any hope of
preserving a civilized society.

As for the post-carbon economy, there is currently no viable plan B. A full-scale
transition effort is urgently needed. The top priority should be to buy as much time as possible
to develop sustainable alternative energy sources. Individuals, villages, states, and governments
need to begin investing in mass transit, energy efficiencies and renewable energy. Before they
will agree to that, they need to believe that the future value of those investments is worth
forgoing other investments or consumption today. Once people grasp the realities of peak oil, a
longer investment horizon becomes possible. We must value the world?s remaining oil resources
as our primary, ever dwindling asset to build the bridge to the future.
Tess, what's your thesis on?
RevdTess
Posts: 3054
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Glasgow

Post by RevdTess »

I did write one paper on the subject but it was brief and - heh - not well received (the lecturer was an economist and didn't really believe in constraints).

My thesis is a gratuitously money-grubbing affair I'm afraid. I've been developing short term trading strategies that function whether crude is plentiful or in shortage.

I do however have one more paper to write in addition to this, and the subject is "scenario planning" ... not sure what my subject will be but could there be a better example than "business as usual" versus "urban doom" versus "return to rural idyll" ? I doubt it! All I have to do is come up with all the potential 'end-games' and the milestones/key turning points society might encounter on the way there...
Vortex
Posts: 6095
Joined: 16 May 2006, 19:14

Post by Vortex »

My thesis is a gratuitously money-grubbing affair I'm afraid. I've been developing short term trading strategies that function whether crude is plentiful or in shortage.
Image
RevdTess
Posts: 3054
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Glasgow

Post by RevdTess »

Must get a copy for the office. What jolly japes!
Vortex
Posts: 6095
Joined: 16 May 2006, 19:14

Post by Vortex »

I found this on my stumbling through the web. It's an MBA thesis on peak oil titled:

STRATEGIC CHOICES FOR MANAGING THE TRANSITION FROM PEAK OIL TO A REDUCED PETROLEUM ECONOMY

Written June 06 by a geologist.

http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~odland/Od ... tation.pdf
Good find Chris. Well worth the read.

I like the point that assuming that the End Is Nigh is in fact a bad approach. You might be wrong .. but if many people have that view then you are creating a self-fullfilling prophecy.
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

Spammers sometimes have the entertaing effect of dragging an interesting article from the depths of the archives :)


edit by adam2, the spam to which this post refers has been deleted.
RevdTess
Posts: 3054
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Glasgow

Post by RevdTess »

Yeah, it's weird reading comments I wrote from 7 years ago that I don't remember ever saying.
User avatar
PS_RalphW
Posts: 6974
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Cambridge

Post by PS_RalphW »

Apart from Hubbard's peak being out of favour as a model for the decline curve, the rest of that paper still seems spot on.
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14814
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

However, the biggest hurdle to overcome in reducing oil consumption is human nature. Denial is the first recourse, followed by a fighting instinct to preserve the status quo. Cataclysmic perceptual and behavioral shifts will be required before individuals voluntarily reduce their oil consumption. Education and discussion of the issues surrounding peak oil are crucial if we are to manage our inevitable transition away from fossil fuels with any hope of preserving a civilized society.

As for the post-carbon economy, there is currently no viable plan B. A full-scale transition effort is urgently needed. The top priority should be to buy as much time as possible to develop sustainable alternative energy sources. Individuals, villages, states, and governments need to begin investing in mass transit, energy efficiencies and renewable energy. Before they
will agree to that, they need to believe that the future value of those investments is worth forgoing other investments or consumption today. Once people grasp the realities of peak oil, a longer investment horizon becomes possible. We must value the world's remaining oil resources as our primary, ever dwindling asset to build the bridge to the future.
Not being cynical or anything but read the above and think, "seven years later." :roll:
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
User avatar
RenewableCandy
Posts: 12777
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
Location: York

Post by RenewableCandy »

Seven years later we're on a rocky plateau, the UK drives fewer miles, chucks less waste and we have a sizeable fleet of wind power, they're cheerfully (?) paying people to "go solar" here, while in warmer/poorer parts of the world solar has reached "grid parity".

I think the "peak ff energy" question is actually being addressed a lot better than many other ones (the state of the oceans is one that springs to mind).
Soyez réaliste. Demandez l'impossible.
Stories
The Price of Time
User avatar
Ralph
Posts: 370
Joined: 02 Nov 2012, 22:25

Post by Ralph »

It strikes me that when you consider the work drawn upon, there is no doubt as to the expected quality of any conclusions derived therein.
I’ve drawn heavily on the assessments of retired petroleum geologists Kenneth Deffeyes, Colin Campbell and Jean Laherrere, energy investment banker Matthew Simmons, and former government analyst Tom Whipple.
Deffeyes called peak nearly a decade ago, Colin in 1989, Simmons decided that the only way to plug a well was to nuke the GOM and claimed that methane was a poison and had to be debunked by the true believers at TOD…which is really saying something.

Laherrere has some credibility in terms of not having his multi-cyclic ideas combined with some other crack pottery, but that is about as good as it gets, and he can be accused of not knowing anything about even the basics of oil field production as far back as the Scientific America article he did with Colin in the late 1990's.

Never heard of this woman, and based on her sources, it is easy to understand why. Jesus, she used the 2005 Hirsch report? The one where he demonstrates that he knows nothing about resource estimates, and uses this as a basis for ASSUMING oil estimates are out of whack as well?
Post Reply