Good idea, take a break (a couple of weeks seems to suit many people, but I don't have holidays so I don't know).stevecook172001 wrote: Give me a ******* break!
Smoking
Moderator: Peak Moderation
-
- Posts: 4124
- Joined: 06 Apr 2009, 22:45
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14287
- Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
- Location: Newbury, Berkshire
- Contact:
The next tax should be on sugar and high fructose corn syrup. Both almost a captive market, both bad for the health and both sold in huge quantities so could supply a huge revenue stream.
The government could justify the tax by saying the higher price will help to reduce obesity. As people went over to artificial sweeteners they could be taxed as well.
I think that there was a sugar tax way back when sugar was first bought back here from the Americas.
The government could justify the tax by saying the higher price will help to reduce obesity. As people went over to artificial sweeteners they could be taxed as well.
I think that there was a sugar tax way back when sugar was first bought back here from the Americas.
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
-
- Posts: 4124
- Joined: 06 Apr 2009, 22:45
Taxing sugar would be a good start, but white wheat flour features strongly in the causes of high blood sugar, so maybe a glycemic load tax may catch more.
To become an extremist, hang around with people you agree with. Cass Sunstein
-
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: 02 Jun 2011, 00:12
- Location: SE England
biffvernon wrote:Oh yes - the only way they could raise a lot of revenue from cycle tyre taxes would be to ban motor cars. Brilliant scheme JSD.
That'll be you extending it to the ridiculous then.
What would happen would be lots of cyclists complaining bitterly about the tax while riding around on bald tyres. Tyre smuggling would be a growth crime.
Meanwhile everyone not affected by the tax would argue for stiffer penalties for avoiders with useful comments such as,
'well they can walk can't they?'
or
'a horse was good enough for my Aunt Ethel and should be damn well good enough for them'.
or even,
'Cyclists are no better today than those fools that used to drive cars. If they want to travel so fast of course they should pay for the damage tyre rubber does to the environment.'
Point (laid bare for the hard of thinking)
People usually only complain about taxes that they pay or that they want other people to pay.
In this case I believe Steve is an exception as he no longer smokes.
Governments on the other hand just tax everything at the highest rate they can get away with in order to buy votes at the next election.
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
- RenewableCandy
- Posts: 12777
- Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
- Location: York
-
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: 02 Jun 2011, 00:12
- Location: SE England
They are not bald. They are designed to be tread-less. Bald tyres have worn away the tread and are now dangerously thin.biffvernon wrote:Ah, now that's where you are wrong. I too used to be under the delusion that bald tyres were undesirable on push-bikes but It has been explained to me, by one who knows about bikes and physics, why treadless tyres are all the rage these days.JavaScriptDonkey wrote: riding around on bald tyres.
It's surprising just how much noise even a bicycle tyre makes when it explodes.
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs339/en/WHO wrote:Tobacco kills nearly 6 million people each year. More than five million of those deaths are the result of direct tobacco use while more than 600 000 are the result of non-smokers being exposed to second-hand smoke.
6 million a year is nothing really, when compared to the 35million a year caused by refined sugar. That makes sugar nearly 7 times more dangerous!6 million a year! Even Hitler didn't manage that rate.
Anyway, you get my drift?
Off topic, i know but hey ho.
However, agreed with the smoking ban i dont want me or my kids exposed to health damaging toxins!
"Unfortunately, the Fed can't print oil"
---Ben Bernake (2011)
---Ben Bernake (2011)
Agree with the tax but there should also be an age limit on the stuff.kenneal - lagger wrote:The next tax should be on sugar and high fructose corn syrup. Both almost a captive market, both bad for the health and both sold in huge quantities so could supply a huge revenue stream.
The government could justify the tax by saying the higher price will help to reduce obesity. As people went over to artificial sweeteners they could be taxed as well.
I think that there was a sugar tax way back when sugar was first bought back here from the Americas.
And as for artificial sweetners well there just as dangerous and in the case of aspartame probably more dangerous and they will not help the obesity rate as aspartame (the most used) has been proven too cause weight gain! ... so much for DIET coke lol.
"Unfortunately, the Fed can't print oil"
---Ben Bernake (2011)
---Ben Bernake (2011)
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
- powerbilston
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 09 Oct 2013, 11:33