We don't have an elected leader at the moment. We have an elected administration/management team. Even this election process appears to be losing its credibility.
The Queen is the closest thing we have to a national leader, elected or otherwise, and we do need leadership. Give me the Queen over Van Rompuy any day.
The Royal Baby
Moderator: Peak Moderation
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
Disagree. Leadership is an outcome as much as an activity. People can be led by a concept or an idea. Just look at religion. She doesn't have to do any "leading" in order to be a rallying point.biffvernon wrote:She doesn't actually do any leading. Her Christmas message is about all we get and I haven't watched that for many years so I'm not sure about even that. Charles tries to lead on sone issues but is not always successful.
Engage in geo-engineering. Plant a tree today.
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
- RenewableCandy
- Posts: 12777
- Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
- Location: York
She is at the moment but my example about Victoria and her painkillers shows the potential. She really knocked the (til then widely-held) belief that they were somehow "sinful" on the head once and for all.
The nearest thing that the Royals are doing today is probably CharlieFarley with his Organic farming.
The nearest thing that the Royals are doing today is probably CharlieFarley with his Organic farming.
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact: