Current Oil Price

Discussion of the latest Peak Oil news (please also check the Website News area below)

Moderator: Peak Moderation

kenneal - lagger
Site Admin
Posts: 14290
Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Contact:

Post by kenneal - lagger »

RalphW wrote:Chinese GDP growth down to a dire 7.7%....

:?
That will mean it will take them 9.35 years to double their use of all the resources that they have ever used! That's ages yet.... :shock: :shock: :shock:
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

biffvernon wrote:Still going down - $87 for WTI
Ooops, just bounced back to $93.
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14815
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

There's a wealth of this type of 'news' item around at present.
Enhanced production techniques were pioneered by the firm Kinder Morgan in the 1990s and then copied by dozens of companies like Apache and Denbury in the late 1990s and early 2000s. The actual results of these businesses made it clear that the assumptions of Peak Oil were simply wrong.

They weren’t sometimes wrong. They were always wrong. They weren’t merely wrong in theory. They were completely wrong in practice.
Here's another.
I have looked at the data, and find that the idea behind peak oil is nonsense.
:lol:
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
User avatar
PS_RalphW
Posts: 6978
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Cambridge

Post by PS_RalphW »

The world is currently well supplied with $100 oil.

$50 oil is hard to come by, outside OPEC. $25 oil is a distant memory.

Peak oil will happen when the world can no longer afford the price of the marginal barrel.

At present, the world is becoming more oil efficient in GDP terms - Chinese GDP is largely coal powered, and oil inefficient OECD countries are drastically cutting consumption. Once we hit the wall of diminishing returns on efficiency gains we will see the gloal economy once more in lock step with oil production.

Peak oil on the large scale is geological. On the bumpy plateau it is economic.
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14815
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

Another slightly tipsy-sounding piece from NASDAQ.
Indeed, it will be 2030 before America is 100% energy-independent. And it will take another ten years before the U.S. is a major exporter of petroleum. But the time is coming.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin
Posts: 14290
Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Contact:

Post by kenneal - lagger »

I notice that the graph only goes back to 1992 and not 1970 so doesn't show just how much "off peak" present production is. Neither do they say what the difference in price is between cheap Saudi oil and very expensive US shale oil. It's just as well that the Saudis and other "old oil" nations are quite happy to accept higher world prices for their cheap to produce oil. They're laughing all the way to the Swiss bank.
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

Out ticker is within a gnat's whisker of $100.

Again.
User avatar
PS_RalphW
Posts: 6978
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Cambridge

Post by PS_RalphW »

BBC reporting WTI at $101. Nearly caught up with Brent at $105.

I guess it is war premium - trouble down the Nile.
Tarrel
Posts: 2466
Joined: 29 Nov 2011, 22:32
Location: Ross-shire, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Tarrel »

The forecast on the ticker is interesting, at $115. IIRC, this seems higher than at other times when the current price has nudged $100. I wonder, is this a "smart" forecast, taking account of multiple trends and factors, or does it merely extrapolate recent price movements?
Engage in geo-engineering. Plant a tree today.
User avatar
PS_RalphW
Posts: 6978
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Cambridge

Post by PS_RalphW »

Definitely not smart. WTI has been gaining on Brent for several months, as extra transport infrastructure has reduced the glut at the mid-West Cushing terminal where the price point of the oil is formally set.

Historically WTI was sold at a premium to Brent. It is simply returning to normal market price.

The US media always report the WTI price, even if it is economically irrelevant. I suspect it has been rigged down these passed years to avoid embarrasing headlines.
User avatar
adam2
Site Admin
Posts: 10895
Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 17:49
Location: North Somerset, twinned with Atlantis

Post by adam2 »

Tarrel wrote:The forecast on the ticker is interesting, at $115. IIRC, this seems higher than at other times when the current price has nudged $100. I wonder, is this a "smart" forecast, taking account of multiple trends and factors, or does it merely extrapolate recent price movements?
I think that the forecast is only very slightly smart.
I suspect that it adds on a roughly fixed percentage to the present price, but that the "present price" is the average over say the last 48 hours, rather than the price at any one moment.

It takes little if any account of recent trends, for example at a time when the price was dropping, the year ahead forcast was still higher than the daily price, despite a falling trend at least in the short term.
"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14815
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

When growth isn't enough
Something has got to go – breathable air or rapid economic growth.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14815
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

$101 for our ticker. I suppose the remarkable thing is that it's been so stable for such a long time.
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14815
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

biffvernon wrote:$101 for our ticker. I suppose the remarkable thing is that it's been so stable for such a long time.
The myth of the US becoming 'energy independent' is becoming...a myth.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
Post Reply