That will mean it will take them 9.35 years to double their use of all the resources that they have ever used! That's ages yet....RalphW wrote:Chinese GDP growth down to a dire 7.7%....
Current Oil Price
Moderator: Peak Moderation
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14290
- Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
- Location: Newbury, Berkshire
- Contact:
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14815
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
There's a wealth of this type of 'news' item around at present.
Here's another.Enhanced production techniques were pioneered by the firm Kinder Morgan in the 1990s and then copied by dozens of companies like Apache and Denbury in the late 1990s and early 2000s. The actual results of these businesses made it clear that the assumptions of Peak Oil were simply wrong.
They weren’t sometimes wrong. They were always wrong. They weren’t merely wrong in theory. They were completely wrong in practice.
I have looked at the data, and find that the idea behind peak oil is nonsense.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
The world is currently well supplied with $100 oil.
$50 oil is hard to come by, outside OPEC. $25 oil is a distant memory.
Peak oil will happen when the world can no longer afford the price of the marginal barrel.
At present, the world is becoming more oil efficient in GDP terms - Chinese GDP is largely coal powered, and oil inefficient OECD countries are drastically cutting consumption. Once we hit the wall of diminishing returns on efficiency gains we will see the gloal economy once more in lock step with oil production.
Peak oil on the large scale is geological. On the bumpy plateau it is economic.
$50 oil is hard to come by, outside OPEC. $25 oil is a distant memory.
Peak oil will happen when the world can no longer afford the price of the marginal barrel.
At present, the world is becoming more oil efficient in GDP terms - Chinese GDP is largely coal powered, and oil inefficient OECD countries are drastically cutting consumption. Once we hit the wall of diminishing returns on efficiency gains we will see the gloal economy once more in lock step with oil production.
Peak oil on the large scale is geological. On the bumpy plateau it is economic.
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14815
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
Another slightly tipsy-sounding piece from NASDAQ.
Indeed, it will be 2030 before America is 100% energy-independent. And it will take another ten years before the U.S. is a major exporter of petroleum. But the time is coming.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14290
- Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
- Location: Newbury, Berkshire
- Contact:
I notice that the graph only goes back to 1992 and not 1970 so doesn't show just how much "off peak" present production is. Neither do they say what the difference in price is between cheap Saudi oil and very expensive US shale oil. It's just as well that the Saudis and other "old oil" nations are quite happy to accept higher world prices for their cheap to produce oil. They're laughing all the way to the Swiss bank.
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
The forecast on the ticker is interesting, at $115. IIRC, this seems higher than at other times when the current price has nudged $100. I wonder, is this a "smart" forecast, taking account of multiple trends and factors, or does it merely extrapolate recent price movements?
Engage in geo-engineering. Plant a tree today.
Definitely not smart. WTI has been gaining on Brent for several months, as extra transport infrastructure has reduced the glut at the mid-West Cushing terminal where the price point of the oil is formally set.
Historically WTI was sold at a premium to Brent. It is simply returning to normal market price.
The US media always report the WTI price, even if it is economically irrelevant. I suspect it has been rigged down these passed years to avoid embarrasing headlines.
Historically WTI was sold at a premium to Brent. It is simply returning to normal market price.
The US media always report the WTI price, even if it is economically irrelevant. I suspect it has been rigged down these passed years to avoid embarrasing headlines.
- adam2
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10895
- Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 17:49
- Location: North Somerset, twinned with Atlantis
I think that the forecast is only very slightly smart.Tarrel wrote:The forecast on the ticker is interesting, at $115. IIRC, this seems higher than at other times when the current price has nudged $100. I wonder, is this a "smart" forecast, taking account of multiple trends and factors, or does it merely extrapolate recent price movements?
I suspect that it adds on a roughly fixed percentage to the present price, but that the "present price" is the average over say the last 48 hours, rather than the price at any one moment.
It takes little if any account of recent trends, for example at a time when the price was dropping, the year ahead forcast was still higher than the daily price, despite a falling trend at least in the short term.
"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14815
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14815
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
- emordnilap
- Posts: 14815
- Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
- Location: here
The myth of the US becoming 'energy independent' is becoming...a myth.biffvernon wrote:$101 for our ticker. I suppose the remarkable thing is that it's been so stable for such a long time.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker