Have we passed Peak Oil yet?

Forum for general discussion of Peak Oil / Oil depletion; also covering related subjects

Moderator: Peak Moderation

Have we passed Peak Oil yet?

Yes
9
24%
No
5
13%
Can't tell
16
42%
Doesn't matter
8
21%
 
Total votes: 38

User avatar
mikepepler
Site Admin
Posts: 3096
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Rye, UK
Contact:

Have we passed Peak Oil yet?

Post by mikepepler »

OK, I know we can't actually answer this one for a variety of reasons, but I was interested to know what people think. What prompted me to ask is I read somewhere that we haven't produced above the level of last December this year. I checked out the data from the EIA (which doesn't include "natural gas plants liquids"), and it gave these figures:

Code: Select all

thousand barrels per day production
              2003        2004        2005       2006
January     67521.156   71563.534   72876.785   73816.17
February    69093.312   71527.169   73153.524   73754.153
March       69619.061   71501.633   73436.107   73502.145
April       68552.259   71444.992   73782.333   73498.372
May         68565.249   71135.997   73928.349   73334.21
June        67774.506   72733.091   73628.596   73381.627
July        68384.214   73083.799   73526.865	
August      68841.592   72158.938   73681.362	
September   69541.700   72776.590   73245.603	
October	  70403.303   73273.727   72972.517	
November    70611.740   72923.909   73654.869	
December    71880.176   72550.464   74310.84	
or in graphical form:

Image

So what do people think? The "noise" is probably bigger than the trend, so maybe it is pointless to speculate, but there is certainly a month-on-month trend from 05 to 06 that wasn't there in previous years, and there were rising prices early this year.

Does anyone know where to get more up-to-date production figures?
User avatar
mikepepler
Site Admin
Posts: 3096
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Rye, UK
Contact:

Post by mikepepler »

I voted "doesn't matter" (though I wonder if it has...). The reason is that I am so completely convinced now that I need to move radically towards a sustainable way of life, I'm going to be doing it anyway, and at the quickest rate I can (within reason). If Peak is years away, I'll have plenty of time to get used to a new way of life, if it's already passed - well I'm going as quickly as I reasonably can anyway. One thing's for certain - even if Peak Oil was suddenly not a problem, I'd still carry on down the same path now anyway.
User avatar
grinu
Posts: 612
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09

Post by grinu »

World slowing down, OPEC preparing to cut production, oil production teetering on a plateau, big drive towards energy efficiency, high oil prices dampening demand. I would guess that production won't reach above its previous peak as a result of these factors, rather than physical availability at this moment in time.

But by the time the capacity and demand and price enable production to reach higher levels, maybe the physical capability won't be there?

So probably not peaked in terms of geological availability but as a result of world situation (high energy prices, demand contraction, economic slow-down etc.).

Pure speculation. :)
Life's too short
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin
Posts: 14287
Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Contact:

Post by kenneal - lagger »

Is it the bumpy plateau?
john.rico
Posts: 17
Joined: 25 Jan 2006, 07:03
Location: Central Europe

Post by john.rico »

kenneal wrote:Is it the bumpy plateau?
I think so.

Light crude is in my opinion past the peak, the rest is tough even now and it will only be worse.
User avatar
EmptyBee
Posts: 336
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Montgomeryshire, Wales

Post by EmptyBee »

I put 'don't know'. I suspect we're close - so much depends on a few key variables like where Saudi is going to be in 4 years. Is Ghawar speeding down the downslope? Will the frenzy off drilling and re-engineering there result in gains in production or merely a mitigation of decline?

Chris Skrebowski's work is what I would turn to first to answer most of these questions - but even that's essentially (highly) educated guesswork.

I hope things stay fairly stable for the next few years at least - I think a spike upwards in production would be a chimera that could support a horribly short-sighted business as usual response. A large decline could be distastrous. A plateau might be the best thing, but this is pure speculation on my part. There is no good scenario. However, given than there is a finite amount of oil, the more we consume today the less there will be available in the future if we're being economically crushed by depletion.
kenneal - lagger
Site Admin
Posts: 14287
Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
Location: Newbury, Berkshire
Contact:

Post by kenneal - lagger »

Let's all hope for a US recession to break us in gently and put off the dreaded day.
User avatar
RogerCO
Posts: 672
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Cornwall, UK

Post by RogerCO »

I'm 100% with Mike on this one.
mikepepler wrote:I voted "doesn't matter" (though I wonder if it has...). The reason is that I am so completely convinced now that I need to move radically towards a sustainable way of life, I'm going to be doing it anyway, and at the quickest rate I can (within reason). If Peak is years away, I'll have plenty of time to get used to a new way of life, if it's already passed - well I'm going as quickly as I reasonably can anyway. One thing's for certain - even if Peak Oil was suddenly not a problem, I'd still carry on down the same path now anyway.
RogerCO
___________________________________
The time for politics is past - now is the time for action.
User avatar
Pippa
Site Admin
Posts: 687
Joined: 27 Apr 2006, 11:07
Location: Cambridgeshire

Post by Pippa »

I also am 100% with Mike
RevdTess
Posts: 3054
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Glasgow

Post by RevdTess »

Me too. In fact sometimes I suspect I am in love with peak oil because it pushes me in the direction of doing what in my heart always felt like the right thing to do anyway, both for the planet, for the rest of humanity and for myself.
User avatar
clv101
Site Admin
Posts: 10574
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Contact:

Post by clv101 »

Tess wrote:Me too. In fact sometimes I suspect I am in love with peak oil because it pushes me in the direction of doing what in my heart always felt like the right thing to do anyway, both for the planet, for the rest of humanity and for myself.
That's an interesting thought... there's a paper in there somewhere.
johnhemming

Post by johnhemming »

Mike - I have taken a copy of your image. Do you mind if I use it? I will start by posting it on my main website.

http://john.hemming.name/national/hasoilpeaked.html

John Hemming MP
RevdTess
Posts: 3054
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Glasgow

Post by RevdTess »

I'd be very careful before using this data to point at a peak. Firstly, consider the datapoint for Dec 2003, and see how we're lower than that number all the way through May 2004. What if you'd claimed 'peak!' then? And even this year, the average of Jan-June is slightly higher than Jan-June in 05. Furthermore, December is a time of peak refiner demand after the October and November maintenance season, and so one might not see December supply exceeded until the following winter if demand growth is sluggish.

Also I'm dubious as to the merit of looking solely at numbers for conventional liquids. For sure this will peak first, if it hasn't already, but so what? This tells us very little about how long we can go on growing unconventional supply. What argument are we trying to make? Even the cornucopians would be unsurprised at conventional oil peaking. They just expect other sources of fuel to economagically appear in its place - and that's the mindset we need to chip away at.
Vortex
Posts: 6095
Joined: 16 May 2006, 19:14

Post by Vortex »

A Manhattan-style project to optimise heavy oil production & refining from Alberta and/or Orinico could make a major difference.

The scale of the resources at both sites means that such a "push" could indeed attract the required investment.

It will however take some years before the price of oil justifies such an investment.

The delay from investment to production will almost certainly mean that we will encounter a significant supply shortfall for several years, whatever happens in the mid to long term.

We should probably expect an unavoidable turbulent & difficult few years around 2008-2015 or so ... at the very minimum.
User avatar
mikepepler
Site Admin
Posts: 3096
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Rye, UK
Contact:

Post by mikepepler »

johnhemming wrote:Mike - I have taken a copy of your image. Do you mind if I use it? I will start by posting it on my main website.

http://john.hemming.name/national/hasoilpeaked.html
Feel free, but take account of what Tess said - this is not a proof of peak, I posted it to provoke discussion. As I said, I voted "doesn't matter" :D

If you would like the spreadsheet behind it, and some more complex ones, drop me a PM or email.
Post Reply