A peoples buy-out of Britains farmland

Forum for general discussion of Peak Oil / Oil depletion; also covering related subjects

Moderator: Peak Moderation

Post Reply
peaceful_life
Posts: 544
Joined: 21 Sep 2010, 16:20

A peoples buy-out of Britains farmland

Post by peaceful_life »

http://www.soilassociation.org/blogs/la ... s-farmland

To envisage that all Britain’s farmland should be held in trust, dedicated in perpetuity to Enlightened Agriculture – farming that is expressly designed to provide everyone with food of the highest quality without wrecking the rest of the world?
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14814
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

You wish.

Brilliant thought though.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
User avatar
RenewableCandy
Posts: 12777
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
Location: York

Post by RenewableCandy »

Apparently The Co-Op is "Britain's biggest farmer". And, it is owned by its punters (including Famille Renewable). So it's not totally unprecidented.

They just need to expand a bit more to take in 18M Ha of land.
Soyez réaliste. Demandez l'impossible.
Stories
The Price of Time
peaceful_life
Posts: 544
Joined: 21 Sep 2010, 16:20

Post by peaceful_life »

emordnilap wrote:You wish.

Brilliant thought though.
Have a bit'o drive aboot ye man!

Nothing ventured an all that ;-0)
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14814
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

I think it's a wonderful idea but.

Imagine, Britain divided up, one parcel per person, the land shared exactly equally. No-one left out but no spare land either, meaning you can't come in without someone leaving. That should cheer the racists up!
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
peaceful_life
Posts: 544
Joined: 21 Sep 2010, 16:20

Post by peaceful_life »

emordnilap wrote:I think it's a wonderful idea but.

Imagine, Britain divided up, one parcel per person, the land shared exactly equally. No-one left out but no spare land either, meaning you can't come in without someone leaving. That should cheer the racists up!
I think the intention is more in keeping with a sense of 'the commons' and good stewardship rather than an individualistic type approach.

Racists...pfft!!!
lurker
Posts: 434
Joined: 17 Jul 2010, 02:55

Post by lurker »

"Now we have the opportunity to carry out a resolute offensive against the kulaks, break their resistance, eliminate them as a class and replace their production with the production of kolkhozes and sovkhozes."
Every time you spend money,you're casting a vote for the kind of world you want.

"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich" -Napoleon Bonaparte
peaceful_life
Posts: 544
Joined: 21 Sep 2010, 16:20

Post by peaceful_life »

lurker wrote:
"Now we have the opportunity to carry out a resolute offensive against the kulaks, break their resistance, eliminate them as a class and replace their production with the production of kolkhozes and sovkhozes."
I never knew the notion of crofting carried such heavy connotations.

To paraphrase Mr Tudge.....

'It seems to me that if one talks about the need for small-mixed-farms, it's very easy to be accussed of being......well the worst thing to be is a hippie, and the next worst thing is a greeny, and the next worst thing is a commie, and if you advocate small-mixed-farms...you are all three'

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzBbHrHGwok
Last edited by peaceful_life on 08 Jan 2013, 22:17, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Catweazle
Posts: 3388
Joined: 17 Feb 2008, 12:04
Location: Petite Bourgeois, over the hills

Post by Catweazle »

I think this would naturally happen ( to a certain extent ) if it wasn't for restrictive planning laws. Nobody wants to farm an acre if they can't live on it.
peaceful_life
Posts: 544
Joined: 21 Sep 2010, 16:20

Post by peaceful_life »

Catweazle wrote:I think this would naturally happen ( to a certain extent ) if it wasn't for restrictive planning laws. Nobody wants to farm an acre if they can't live on it.
http://ecologicalland.coop/projects-small-successful

True, planning needs addressed.


http://ecologicalland.coop/greenham-rea ... l-holdings

The official reasons for refusal, drafted over a tea break, reflected the principal concern about our application:

“If granted, based upon the supporting information submitted, the proposal would set a precedent for further dwellings, in association with permaculture and agroforestry proposals, in the countryside which the Local Planning Authority would find hard to resist.”
Post Reply