Dash for Gas II

Discussion of the latest Peak Oil news (please also check the Website News area below)

Moderator: Peak Moderation

Post Reply
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Dash for Gas II

Post by biffvernon »

Anyhing Thatcher did we can do worse:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2 ... tations-uk
Twenty new gas-fired power stations are likely to be built in the UK, amounting to a massive increase in consumption of the fossil fuel, the climate and energy secretary, Ed Davey, has told the Guardian.

But Davey insisted the expansion – the biggest construction effort in the power sector for decades – would not harm the prospects for investment in renewable energy or in the government's carbon reduction targets.

He said: "I strongly support more gas, just as I strongly support more renewable energy. We need a big expansion of renewable energy and of gas if we are to tackle our climate change challenges."
Spot the fail.
User avatar
AnOriginalIdea
Posts: 73
Joined: 19 Dec 2011, 15:08

Re: Dash for Gas II

Post by AnOriginalIdea »

biffvernon wrote:
Spot the fail.
They didn't include building more nukes.
User avatar
Catweazle
Posts: 3388
Joined: 17 Feb 2008, 12:04
Location: Petite Bourgeois, over the hills

Re: Dash for Gas II

Post by Catweazle »

AnOriginalIdea wrote:
biffvernon wrote:
Spot the fail.
They didn't include building more nukes.
We have a winner.
Blue Peter
Posts: 1939
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Milton Keynes

Re: Dash for Gas II

Post by Blue Peter »

AnOriginalIdea wrote:
biffvernon wrote:
Spot the fail.
They didn't include building more nukes.
Haven't they reclassified nukes as renewables or something?


Peter.
Does anyone know where the love of God goes when the waves turn the seconds to hours?
User avatar
adam2
Site Admin
Posts: 10907
Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 17:49
Location: North Somerset, twinned with Atlantis

Post by adam2 »

Big article in todays Times about this.

Definatly a new dash for gas.
Forget the enviroment, the sheeple have got to have cheap gas and electricity.
It has been previously been stated that the carbon intensity of electricity production was to be greatly reduced by most new generation being renewable or nuclear.

A loophole has been found to avoid this commitment.
It is suggested that carbon emmisions from electricity generation could be exempted on the grounds that new technology might in the future reduce emmisions from other sectors of the economy such as transport.
Hydrogen powered trucks being mentioned as an alternative.

All very ill considered. Hydrogen trucks will in effect be electricly powered or natural gas powered, so not much benifit there !

Leaving aside the enviroment which is probably a lost cause in any case, this new dash for gas still seems most unwise.

From where is all this gas to be obtained ?
And at what price ?
And what about the nimbeyfests regarding all the new gas import terminals, storage facilities, and pipelines ?
And are they aware that increasing the gas burnt for power generation will increase the price to far beyond todays levels, thereby leading to price increases.

And I supose they have allowed for a large scale re-armanent program and expansion of our armed forces to protect UK interests in gas producing regions ?
"Installers and owners of emergency diesels must assume that they will have to run for a week or more"
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14814
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

adam2 wrote:Forget the enviroment, the sheeple have got to have cheap gas and electricity.
That sums it up.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
User avatar
RenewableCandy
Posts: 12777
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
Location: York

Post by RenewableCandy »

Has UK gas production really HALVED since its peak in 2000 then :shock: :shock: :shock: ??
Soyez réaliste. Demandez l'impossible.
Stories
The Price of Time
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14814
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

Good graph, Chris. Can you explain what you mean about becoming a net importer in 2004? I can't figure that one from the graph. Thanks.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
User avatar
RenewableCandy
Posts: 12777
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
Location: York

Post by RenewableCandy »

Blue line is NET imports. It crosses the zero axis from negative to positive in 2004.
Soyez réaliste. Demandez l'impossible.
Stories
The Price of Time
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14814
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

Ah. Right.

I think.
:?
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
User avatar
clv101
Site Admin
Posts: 10556
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Contact:

Post by clv101 »

emordnilap wrote:Good graph, Chris. Can you explain what you mean about becoming a net importer in 2004? I can't figure that one from the graph. Thanks.
The blue line is imports (or exports) and it read against the right hand axis. Before 2004 it was negative meaning we were exporting, after 2004 it's positive meaning imports.
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14814
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

Eventually. :oops:
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
Post Reply