Olympics

Forum for general discussion of Peak Oil / Oil depletion; also covering related subjects

Moderator: Peak Moderation

User avatar
nexus
Posts: 1305
Joined: 16 May 2009, 22:57

Post by nexus »

That about sums it up. :D :twisted:
Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Frederick Douglass
User avatar
JohnB
Posts: 6456
Joined: 22 May 2006, 17:42
Location: Beautiful sunny West Wales!

Post by JohnB »

Yup. We've had the circus, but now there won't be any grain to make the bread!
John

Eco-Hamlets UK - Small sustainable neighbourhoods
peaceful_life
Posts: 544
Joined: 21 Sep 2010, 16:20

Post by peaceful_life »

RenewableCandy wrote:
peaceful_life wrote:A desperate denial of cerebral metamorphosis.
You mean that there's some cerebral metamorphosis going on right now and we're all in denial? Or, erm, what?
Yeah.
I dunno who 'all' is, the numbers in constant flux ya see.
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

I enjoyed the party. Nice to see Dr Brian May sporting anti-hunting logos.
User avatar
Catweazle
Posts: 3388
Joined: 17 Feb 2008, 12:04
Location: Petite Bourgeois, over the hills

Post by Catweazle »

biffvernon wrote:Nice to see Dr Brian May sporting anti-hunting logos.
Fox-hunting by the Hoorah Henrys is already banned and they are now shot for livestock protection, and Badgers are protected except for a very small experimental cull, also for livestock protection. Both, ultimately, for the good of our own food supply.

If you think there is a shortage of either foxes or badgers you need to go to the South East, foxes are walking the streets amongst the schoolkids on their way to school and badgers stroll along the middle of country roads in the early hours.
featherstick
Posts: 1324
Joined: 05 Mar 2010, 14:40

Post by featherstick »

Catweazle wrote:
biffvernon wrote:Nice to see Dr Brian May sporting anti-hunting logos.
Fox-hunting by the Hoorah Henrys is already banned and they are now shot for livestock protection, and Badgers are protected except for a very small experimental cull, also for livestock protection. Both, ultimately, for the good of our own food supply.

If you think there is a shortage of either foxes or badgers you need to go to the South East, foxes are walking the streets amongst the schoolkids on their way to school and badgers stroll along the middle of country roads in the early hours.
I've often thought we could get the Marines in to shoot the foxes humanely, and send the Quorn and the Fitzwilliam and the other hunts over to have a crack at the Afghan. It's a win-win-win.
"Tea's a good drink - keeps you going"
Little John

Post by Little John »

I've seen foxes who've died from gunshot wounds. They wounds they receive are sometimes not instantaneously fatal and so the fox staggers off to a miserable, painful and protracted death under a hedge somewhere.

Reminds me of the animal-rights do-gooders aided and abetted by unelected EU project engineers who pushed for all of the slaughterhouse regulations that now plague that industry. The upshot is that most of the small and local slaughterhouses went out of business because they were unable to implement the new regulations. Only the larger ones could do that due to economy of scale of costs. This now means that animals must travel half way across the country in overcrowded lorries before they meet the slaughterer. By the time they get there, they are massively traumatised. When it was just a few miles down the road, the animal suffered far less I'm sure of it.

Hunting with hounds for foxes is no more likely to cause suffering of foxes than is shooting or gassing and is likely, in my opinion to cause them to suffer less. Hunting also has the additional advantage of only taking out the old, the sick and the stupid. Not so with gassing or shooting.

Please don't anybody make the mistake of assuming that the above means I have no love for the non-human animal world or that I think that humans needs/wants should take precedent over the needs of other non-human animals. Quite the opposite in fact. I just think that there is a lot of urban, anthropomorphic, ignorant bollocks talked about animal "rights"
Last edited by Little John on 13 Aug 2012, 14:30, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
emordnilap
Posts: 14814
Joined: 05 Sep 2007, 16:36
Location: here

Post by emordnilap »

stevecook172001 wrote:Hunting also has the additional advantage of only taking out the old, the sick and the stupid. Not so with gassing or shooting.
But at least they're easy to spot, the worst of them wearing red.
I experience pleasure and pains, and pursue goals in service of them, so I cannot reasonably deny the right of other sentient agents to do the same - Steven Pinker
Tarrel
Posts: 2466
Joined: 29 Nov 2011, 22:32
Location: Ross-shire, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Tarrel »

This now means that animals must travel half way across the country in overcrowded lorries before they meet the slaughterer
This was also cited as one reason for the rapid spread of Foot and Mouth disease during the major outbreak a few years ago.
Hunting with hounds for foxes is no more likely to cause suffering of foxes than is shooting or gassing and is likely, in my opinion to cause them to suffer less. Hunting also has the additional advantage of only taking out the old, the sick and the stupid. Not so with gassing or shooting.
Also has the benefit of slowing the whole process down, thus acting as a natural curb on the killing. With some other forms of "field sport" (e.g. pheasant or grouse shooting), the size of the "bag" is just scandalous, with far more birds being taken than could ever be justified for the table.
Engage in geo-engineering. Plant a tree today.
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

Never mind the destruction of natural habitat. (There's nothing natural about heather moorland.)

Fact is, folk who kill animals for pleasure are the sort of people I think are nasty.

Wildlife management is a completely different topic.
extractorfan
Posts: 988
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Ricky
Contact:

Post by extractorfan »

biffvernon wrote:
Fact is, folk who kill animals for pleasure are the sort of people I think are nasty.
I agree with that, but I'd rather just be allowed to kick them in the balls than pay for policing a ban.
User avatar
Catweazle
Posts: 3388
Joined: 17 Feb 2008, 12:04
Location: Petite Bourgeois, over the hills

Post by Catweazle »

stevecook172001 wrote:Hunting with hounds for foxes is no more likely to cause suffering of foxes than is shooting or gassing and is likely, in my opinion to cause them to suffer less. Hunting also has the additional advantage of only taking out the old, the sick and the stupid. Not so with gassing or shooting.
The Hunts have used that argument too, and I think you're right - sensationalist headlines about foxes being "ripped apart" by hounds mean nothing to the fox - it's long dead before the rest of the pack gets to it.

Remember though, when you read about Hunts doing "fox-control", it doesn't hold much water when they deliberately dig sets for foxes to breed in, ban people from shooting them and even trap them elsewhere and release them on the day.

In my opinion foxes need controlling and shooting is the most humane way to do it. I've shot a few myself, they dropped instantly because they were shot correctly. Frustrated farmers taking pot-shots at distant foxes with their shotguns is a different matter, but it wouldn't happen if the authorities didn't make it so difficult to get a rifle to do the job with.
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

Fortunately the foxes are winning the endless rabbit wars in my garden, to the benefit of the veg patch.

Zillions of pheasants are reared and released into the 'wild' where they destroy wild-flowers and compete with thrushes and other native birds for invertebrates, only to be shot by the nasty people who then dump the unwanted carcasses.
Tarrel
Posts: 2466
Joined: 29 Nov 2011, 22:32
Location: Ross-shire, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Tarrel »

biffvernon wrote:Fortunately the foxes are winning the endless rabbit wars in my garden, to the benefit of the veg patch.

Zillions of pheasants are reared and released into the 'wild' where they destroy wild-flowers and compete with thrushes and other native birds for invertebrates, only to be shot by the nasty people who then dump the unwanted carcasses.
Then there's grouse-shooting. Up here many wild-fires are started accidentally as a result of muir-burn, where the heather on the grouse-moors is burned off to stimulate the new, tender growth that the grouse like.

Indigenous raptors such as buzzards, red kites and even golden eagles are targeted by estate owners in order to protect the grouse population, which then breed in vast numbers in order to be shot come the "glorious 12th" (today actually - the actual 12th was yesterday, but being Sunday the grouse were spared).

:roll:
Engage in geo-engineering. Plant a tree today.
Tarrel
Posts: 2466
Joined: 29 Nov 2011, 22:32
Location: Ross-shire, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Tarrel »

I just had to scroll back up to find out at what point this stopped being an Olympic thread and started being a Hunting thread. Brian May was the catalyst. :)
Engage in geo-engineering. Plant a tree today.
Post Reply