US Congress passes authoritarian anti-protest law

Discussion of the latest Peak Oil news (please also check the Website News area below)

Moderator: Peak Moderation

madibe
Posts: 1595
Joined: 23 Jun 2009, 13:00

Post by madibe »

JSD. Why does your use of the word 'Leftie' feel like such an insult?

There are many shades of grey.

However, if I have to take my pick I will continue to go with the ethics of the left.

Personally I see right wing poilitics as selfish, destructive, bigoted and shortsighted. But that's just my personal opinion.... but here's the rub...

What you are proposing seems to be, that when the assholes screw the largest majority of humankind in the face... well, they (the plebs) should just chill back and take it.

I disagree. On principle. If a few are inconvenienced then that is just tough. Most of the general population has benefited in some way from active protest....in fact an awful lot of it unpopular to TPTB and some of it illegal.

Where would equal rights for women be? Where would workers rights be? Where would the abolition of slavery be? Child labour? Religious freedom? Parliament? It has all been fought for.

Fought for.

Not given because the prolatariat has pulled its collective forelock particullarly hard.

So JSD, before you slink off with the rest of the sheeple, give a thought to those who make, and have made, a sacrifice for the standard of life you now enjoy.
User avatar
Ludwig
Posts: 3849
Joined: 08 Jul 2008, 00:31
Location: Cambridgeshire

Post by Ludwig »

nexus wrote:Begbie wrote
WUM Rolling Eyes
Or corporate shill more likely, judging by most of his posts

The more obnoxious claptrap he writes, the more he shows his true colours. From his most recent drivel it is clear he wouldn't have supported the abolition of slavery, universal suffrage or the end of apartheid.

:roll:
+1

If I were a corporate shill I would make a point of being polite, friendly and charming, because that is the most effective way of getting people to believe bollocks. It's amazing how few of those paid to deceive are actually any good at it.

What JSD's motives are we can only speculate about, but if they are sincere it's unfortunate for him that his manner arouses suspicions.
"We're just waiting, looking skyward as the days go down / Someone promised there'd be answers if we stayed around."
User avatar
woodpecker
Posts: 851
Joined: 06 Jan 2009, 01:20
Location: London

Post by woodpecker »

We have this type of of law in London already. The Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 introduced Designated Areas - the main designated area being one that stretches from approx Victoria to the National Theatre, 1km radius. No kind of demo permitted, not just Occupy-style.

The Police Reform & Social Responsibility Act also addresses the issue but I understand that SOCPA sections 132 et el are still in force.
ujoni08
Posts: 880
Joined: 03 Oct 2009, 19:23
Location: Stroud Gloucestershire

agree

Post by ujoni08 »

Agree with Nexus and Ludwig. He seems to keep just this side of the line at times, so that he can stay on the board. Reminds me of some recent friends we had on here...
Post Reply