A (missile) blast from the past?

Discussion of the latest Peak Oil news (please also check the Website News area below)

Moderator: Peak Moderation

BitSlice10101
Posts: 27
Joined: 09 Jan 2012, 14:23
Location: London

Post by BitSlice10101 »

+1 for the "iranians could make life hell for the americans" ive been saying this for a while, iran has got a decent army and they will give the americans one hell of a fight it wont be no where near as easy as iraq, as for the hoping britain wont get involved part sadly that aint gonna happen, if america goes to war britain go to war end of.
Iran does not have a decent army, navy or air force.


They have a better than average missile defence system but that can be taken out with little or no loss.


I doubt they are going to invade Iran there would be no point to it.
What may happen is that there will be attacks to gain Air Superiority followed by tactical airstrikes on Air force and Navy. Followed by destruction of Nuclear facilities by long range surface to surface, cruise missiles, drones and B2 stealth bombers.


Even if the unthinkable silly thing happens i.e. boots on the ground, you might as well go crazy and drag Israel and the willing parts of NATO into it. Military wise Isreal have the ability to neutralise any Irananian Assets that they deem a threat, alone (Not without losses). America is the only thing holding Israel back from a strike on Iran. In fact they are not stopping them just pushing the timetable for action back.
hodson2k9
Posts: 546
Joined: 21 Dec 2011, 13:13
Location: telford west midlands

Post by hodson2k9 »

BitSlice10101 wrote:
+1 for the "iranians could make life hell for the americans" ive been saying this for a while, iran has got a decent army and they will give the americans one hell of a fight it wont be no where near as easy as iraq, as for the hoping britain wont get involved part sadly that aint gonna happen, if america goes to war britain go to war end of.
Iran does not have a decent army, navy or air force.


They have a better than average missile defence system but that can be taken out with little or no loss.


I doubt they are going to invade Iran there would be no point to it.
What may happen is that there will be attacks to gain Air Superiority followed by tactical airstrikes on Air force and Navy. Followed by destruction of Nuclear facilities by long range surface to surface, cruise missiles, drones and B2 stealth bombers.


Even if the unthinkable silly thing happens i.e. boots on the ground, you might as well go crazy and drag Israel and the willing parts of NATO into it. Military wise Isreal have the ability to neutralise any Irananian Assets that they deem a threat, alone (Not without losses). America is the only thing holding Israel back from a strike on Iran. In fact they are not stopping them just pushing the timetable for action back.
"america is the only thing holding israel back" if israel wanted to strike yet, they would they dont give a shit what america say, america do what israel say.

When i said army i meant there whole military package, and they have the weaponary to strike every american base that are stationed in the middle east.
BitSlice10101
Posts: 27
Joined: 09 Jan 2012, 14:23
Location: London

Post by BitSlice10101 »

When i said army i meant there whole military package, and they have the weaponary to strike every american base that are stationed in the middle east.
Iraq made similar claims.

Irans Missile program.

Shahab-3b: 2,500km
Sajjil-1 and 2: 2,000km
Shahab-3a: 1,800km
Shahab-3: 1,300km
Shahab-2: 500km
Zelzal: up to 400km
Fateh: 170km

Sources: GlobalSecurity.org,
AFP, Jane's


These missiles are based on North Korean and Libyan technology. Iran has up to 150 Shabab-2 missiles and up to 300 of the Shahab-1 and a few of the Shahab-3 if any.

They have the range but they are very large, unreliable, lack any type of radar evasion technology or resistance to electronic counter measures. These things belong to another age.

Iran’s missile program still relies on Scud missiles to bolster numbers and we know how accurate they are.

I am not saying they could not hit roughly a wide area target or two, but Iran is going to need a lot more than multi-generational out of date missiles to have the slightest fighting chance of defending its Nuclear Program

Cruise missiles or Shahab no contest
hodson2k9
Posts: 546
Joined: 21 Dec 2011, 13:13
Location: telford west midlands

Post by hodson2k9 »

tbf it dont really matter what iran has or has not got everyone knows that america could/will flatten them, but what im saying is it wont be as easy as iraq was and there will be alot more american deaths than the iraq war. (plus alot more suffering around the globe imo, and thats even if the war is contained to the middle east)

any one got any thoughts on how the price/availability of oil will be affected? i dont see oil pipelines etc escaping without damage.
hodson2k9
Posts: 546
Joined: 21 Dec 2011, 13:13
Location: telford west midlands

Post by hodson2k9 »


Iraq made similar claims


it doesnt matter what iraq claimed there military is piss poor compared to iran, iran has the 2nd most powerful military in the middle east behind israel, obviously compared to america, irans military is piss poor aswell but atleast they can make a better fight of it than iraq, the war in iraq (if you can call it that), was like a bunch of secondary school teenagers going down to fight a bunch of toddlers at nursery, atleast with this war the toddlers are now nearing the end of primary school.
BitSlice10101
Posts: 27
Joined: 09 Jan 2012, 14:23
Location: London

Post by BitSlice10101 »

BitSlice10101
Posts: 27
Joined: 09 Jan 2012, 14:23
Location: London

Post by BitSlice10101 »

"america is the only thing holding israel back" if israel wanted to strike yet, they would they dont give a shit what america say, america do what israel say.
If this were true then why have they not acted yet, even with threats of wiping Isreal off the face of the map?
BitSlice10101
Posts: 27
Joined: 09 Jan 2012, 14:23
Location: London

Post by BitSlice10101 »

hodson2k9 wrote:

Iraq made similar claims


it doesnt matter what iraq claimed there military is piss poor compared to iran, iran has the 2nd most powerful military in the middle east behind israel, obviously compared to america, irans military is piss poor aswell but atleast they can make a better fight of it than iraq, the war in iraq (if you can call it that), was like a bunch of secondary school teenagers going down to fight a bunch of toddlers at nursery, atleast with this war the toddlers are now nearing the end of primary school.
Hogwash
hodson2k9
Posts: 546
Joined: 21 Dec 2011, 13:13
Location: telford west midlands

Post by hodson2k9 »

BitSlice10101 wrote:
"america is the only thing holding israel back" if israel wanted to strike yet, they would they dont give a shit what america say, america do what israel say.
If this were true then why have they not acted yet, even with threats of wiping Isreal off the face of the map?
they never once threatened to wipe israel off the map thats what your made to believe, you should stop reading mainstream media
have a read of that.
www.en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Ahm ... and_Israel
michigan Professor of Modern Middle East
and South Asian History, agrees that
Ahmadinejad's statement should be
translated as, "the Imam said that this
regime occupying Jerusalem (een rezhim-e
eshghalgar-e qods) must [vanish from] the
page of time (bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar
mahv shavad).
he was on about the Jewish-
Zionist regime occupying Jerusalem.
Last edited by hodson2k9 on 22 Jan 2012, 17:20, edited 1 time in total.
hodson2k9
Posts: 546
Joined: 21 Dec 2011, 13:13
Location: telford west midlands

Post by hodson2k9 »

BitSlice10101 wrote:
"america is the only thing holding israel back" if israel wanted to strike yet, they would they dont give a shit what america say, america do what israel say.
If this were true then why have they not acted yet, even with threats of wiping Isreal off the face of the map?
ive put these quotes up before but ill put them up again :

“Believe me, America accepts all our
decisions. The Obama Admin will put
forth new peace initiatives only if Israel
wants it to.”
– Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor
Lieberman

“Every time we do something you tell
me America will do this and will do
that . . . I want to tell you something
very clear: Don’t worry about American
pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish
people, control America, and
theAmericans know it.”
Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon

“You know very well, and the stupid
Americans know equally well, that we
control their government, irrespective
of who sits in the White House. You
see, I know it and you know it that no
American president can be in a
position to challenge us even if we do
the unthinkable. What can they
(Americans) do to us? We control
congress, we control the media, we
control show biz, and we control
everything in America. In America
you can criticize God, but you can’t
criticize Israel…”
-Israeli spokeswoman, Tzipora
Menache

what did america have to say about these comments, absolutely nothing, if anyone else from the ME (or any other country fir that matter) had said that then im sure america would of responded with harsh words within hours.
JavaScriptDonkey
Posts: 1683
Joined: 02 Jun 2011, 00:12
Location: SE England

Post by JavaScriptDonkey »

If Israel were to decide to go all Rock & Roll on Iran then they would be running the risk of galvanising the Arab world against them. That might come in the form of another oil embargo on the US.

Now that China is buying serious quantities and can keep the Sheiks in AKs there is less of an economic incentive to keep the US sweet.
User avatar
RenewableCandy
Posts: 12777
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
Location: York

Post by RenewableCandy »

Perhaps the USA never responded to those comments because they, erm, never happened?
Soyez réaliste. Demandez l'impossible.
Stories
The Price of Time
BitSlice10101
Posts: 27
Joined: 09 Jan 2012, 14:23
Location: London

Post by BitSlice10101 »

they never once threatened to wipe israel off the map thats what your made to believe, you should stop reading mainstream media
have a read of that.
www.en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Ahm ... and_Israel
Broken Link, If its on Wiki it must be true?

You seem to get your info out of sources like a Dan Brown novel or Above Top Secret Forums



he was on about the Jewish-
Zionist regime occupying Jerusalem.
Empty ramblings of a madman.

The Zionists are out to get us all..! :roll: Iran is a nasty regime that no one will miss, did you forget how they like to shoot their own un-armed people who protest including women, alot of Iranains want to see the back of their own government.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a loon pure and simple, you know it and I know it.
Last edited by BitSlice10101 on 23 Jan 2012, 16:02, edited 1 time in total.
BitSlice10101
Posts: 27
Joined: 09 Jan 2012, 14:23
Location: London

Post by BitSlice10101 »

ive put these quotes up before but ill put them up again :

“Believe me, America accepts all our
decisions. The Obama Admin will put
forth new peace initiatives only if Israel
wants it to.”
– Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor
Lieberman

“Every time we do something you tell
me America will do this and will do
that . . . I want to tell you something
very clear: Don’t worry about American
pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish
people, control America, and
theAmericans know it.”
Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon

“You know very well, and the stupid
Americans know equally well, that we
control their government, irrespective
of who sits in the White House. You
see, I know it and you know it that no
American president can be in a
position to challenge us even if we do
the unthinkable. What can they
(Americans) do to us? We control
congress, we control the media, we
control show biz, and we control
everything in America. In America
you can criticize God, but you can’t
criticize Israel…”
-Israeli spokeswoman, Tzipora
Menache
Evidence of this ?

Even if these statements were made, they are laughable wishful thinking at best.
what did america have to say about these comments, absolutely nothing, if anyone else from the ME (or any other country fir that matter) had said that then im sure america would of responded with harsh words within hours.
Probably becuase they were never said, or perhaps it was an Iranian state T.V. translating them that way :roll:
hodson2k9
Posts: 546
Joined: 21 Dec 2011, 13:13
Location: telford west midlands

Post by hodson2k9 »


Broken Link, If its on Wiki it must be true?

You seem to get your info out of sources like a Dan Brown novel or Above Top Secret
obviously not, however imo its true, weather you believe it or not i dont give a shit. There were different sources to choose from i chose wiki.





Iran is a nasty regime that no one will miss, did you forget how they like to shoot their own un-armed people who protest including women, alot of Iranains want to see the back of their own government.
and your point is? N.korea, zimbabwe all bad regimes lets go to war with them, whats it got to do with america anyway? they should look at there own regime, wont be long till they shoot there own un-armed for protesting.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a loon pure and simple, you know it and I know it.
do i now thats news to me.
Last edited by hodson2k9 on 23 Jan 2012, 19:18, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply