I don't agree. For the banks, owning the gold isn't providing them with wealth, because they can't sell it. As for the individuals...most high net worth individuals today don't own any gold. They pay other people vast amounts of money to manage their wealth and they are accustomed to that pot getting bigger over time. Most of these large funds own little or no gold. A lot of currently high net worth individuals would actually lose an unimaginably vast amount of wealth. So would every pension fund.JavaScriptDonkey wrote:A return to a gold standard would be an economic disaster benefiting only those who control large amounts of gold - central banks, investment banks and very high nett worth individuals. You would be handing a huge amount of monetary power to the very people who are already fantastically wealthy.UndercoverElephant wrote:That is myth/propaganda. It is a totally fallacious claim. If the price of gold is high enough then there's enough gold. PERIOD.vtsnowedin wrote: I believe you are correct in that and because you are correct ,and that effect is well known, there is no chance of the USA or any other large economy going back on the gold standard. There just isn't enough gold to do the job
There would be a massive transfer/destruction of wealth away from people who hold paper assets denominated in fiat currencies (including cash, bonds, credit default swaps and to some extent stocks/shares) towards people who own land, the right sorts of property, precious metals and futures contracts for commodities of various sorts.
Those countries can exchange their coal/oil for gold, or use other people's gold-backed money.Countries with large manufacturing bases or non-gold assets such as coal or oil would be unable to issue currency against the value of those endeavours. People who happened to own large lumps of shiny yellow metal would end up owning everything as only their money would be legal.