The geologist's view
Moderator: Peak Moderation
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
The geologist's view
Brian Lovell, President of the London Geological Society, talking about the geologist's view of global warming.
http://ecopreservationsociety.org/site/ ... e-concern-
Not climate models, just the rock solid evidence.
He's talking about the Geol. Soc.'s Position Statement from last November:
http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/gsl/views/pol ... e7426.html
http://ecopreservationsociety.org/site/ ... e-concern-
Not climate models, just the rock solid evidence.
He's talking about the Geol. Soc.'s Position Statement from last November:
http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/gsl/views/pol ... e7426.html
The rock tells no lies.
Just ask Ozzy Osbourne.
Just ask Ozzy Osbourne.
Andy Hunt
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
Eternal Sunshine wrote: I wouldn't want to worry you with the truth.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14287
- Joined: 20 Sep 2006, 02:35
- Location: Newbury, Berkshire
- Contact:
Shell would be interested in CCS. They stand to make a lot of money out of it. CCS is OK for countries that have drilled for oil but what about the ones that haven't; where do they put all their CO2?
Can't see it happening, myself. I will be too costly and make us uncompetitive. That will be the excuse. Anyway the economy will go t*ts up before CCS gets going.
Can't see it happening, myself. I will be too costly and make us uncompetitive. That will be the excuse. Anyway the economy will go t*ts up before CCS gets going.
Action is the antidote to despair - Joan Baez
Gas has a habit of escaping, as anyone who has ever tried to stop it can testify.
Andy Hunt
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
http://greencottage.burysolarclub.net
Eternal Sunshine wrote: I wouldn't want to worry you with the truth.
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
Well, perhaps it helps the case for AGW, perhaps it doesn't. Ignoring Lovell's little polemic, looking at the BGS statement:
During warmings from glacial to interglacial, temperature and CO2 rose together for several thousand years, although the best estimate from the end of the last glacial is that the temperature probably started to rise a few centuries before the CO2 showed any reaction. Palaeoclimatologists think that initial warming driven by changes in the Earth’s orbit and axial tilt eventually caused CO2 to be released from the warming ocean and thus, via positive feedback, to reinforce the temperature rise already in train.
Re: The geologist's view
[quote="biffvernon"]
Last edited by RGR on 12 Aug 2011, 06:17, edited 1 time in total.
- biffvernon
- Posts: 18538
- Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
- Location: Lincolnshire
- Contact:
The trolls are hunting in packs now they know the game's up.
Michael Klare posted a piece with links to some good stuff on http://www.tomdispatch.com/ yesterday.
Michael Klare posted a piece with links to some good stuff on http://www.tomdispatch.com/ yesterday.
I had the opportunity to have dinner with Klare a while back, he's great guy. Had a clearer idea what was going on in the world back a decade ago when he wrote Resource Wars (2002) than many posting on Power Switch do today. I'd still recommend Resource Wars to anyone thinking about geopolitics in an increasingly resource constrained world.