Nuclear accident follows Japanese earthqauke

Is nuclear fission going to make a comeback and plug the gap in our energy needs? Will nuclear fusion ever become energetically viable?

Moderator: Peak Moderation

User avatar
clv101
Site Admin
Posts: 10552
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Contact:

Post by clv101 »

RenewableCandy wrote:However, might I point out that myself, KenNeal and Biff are all easily identifiable: it would almost certainly be a useful addition to the debate if we knew who the Inspector was irl. Not only would it raise the tone, it might shed some much-needed light on the nuclear industry.
This is a really good point - I've been involved in a quite a few on-line publishing and community discussion projects - anonymity and serious, respectful discussion doesn't tend to go well together. At The Oil Drum, we mostly use our real names now, where initially most didn't.

Folk who want to be taken seriously and respectful, would do well not to hide their identities.
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

RenewableCandy wrote: I'm ready to hear interesting stuff, because frankly all one hears from the outside is bad news followed by bland assurances
Sorry but here's more bad news; you'll have to wait a bit for the bland assurances that will doubtless follow. The Tsuruga power station over on the west coast of Japan has had a leak: 3,900,000 becquerels of xenon per litre were detected. The reactor was shut down earlier today.
User avatar
RenewableCandy
Posts: 12777
Joined: 12 Sep 2007, 12:13
Location: York

Post by RenewableCandy »

West coast?? Nowt to do with the tsunami, then?
Soyez réaliste. Demandez l'impossible.
Stories
The Price of Time
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

Indeed. Just the regular stuff of nukes going wrong. Nothing to worry about. It seems a dramatic xenon spike is a feature of leaks in a fuel rod.
An Inspector Calls

Post by An Inspector Calls »

biffvernon wrote:
RenewableCandy wrote: I'm ready to hear interesting stuff, because frankly all one hears from the outside is bad news followed by bland assurances
Sorry but here's more bad news; you'll have to wait a bit for the bland assurances that will doubtless follow. The Tsuruga power station over on the west coast of Japan has had a leak: 3,900,000 becquerels of xenon per litre were detected. The reactor was shut down earlier today.
I'm not sure where you get your figure from:
http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/news/201 ... 7000c.html
suggests it's 3,900 not 3,900,000. And the leak seems to be one fuel canister. Routine stuff I would have thought.
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

An Inspector Calls wrote: I'm not sure where you get your figure from:
http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/news/201 ... 7000c.html
suggests it's 3,900 not 3,900,000. And the leak seems to be one fuel canister. Routine stuff I would have thought.
A clever inspector would notice the units.

3900 Bq/cubic centimetres is the same as 3900000 Bq/litre

I expressed the figure using SI units, avoiding the cc.

Like I said, "Just the regular stuff of nukes going wrong. Nothing to worry about."
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

Ok. It was 3900000000 Bq/m^3
2 As and a B
Posts: 2590
Joined: 28 Nov 2008, 19:06

Post by 2 As and a B »

Dying for TEPCO
While Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) experiences difficulties in recruiting workers willing to go to Fukushima to clean up the damaged reactors, the World Health Organization (WHO) is planning to conduct an epidemiological survey on the catastrophe. This is the first of two reports offering a worker-centered analysis of the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
Front line at Fukushima
I'm hippest, no really.
2 As and a B
Posts: 2590
Joined: 28 Nov 2008, 19:06

Post by 2 As and a B »

Fukushima workers enter nuclear reactor building

Workers at Japan's Fukushima nuclear plant have entered one of its reactor buildings for the first time since it was hit by a powerful earthquake on 11 March, officials say.

They are installing ventilation systems in the No 1 reactor to filter out radioactive material from the air.

...article continues
They're starting with the worst affected reactor first, yeah?
I'm hippest, no really.
User avatar
biffvernon
Posts: 18538
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Lincolnshire
Contact:

Post by biffvernon »

The lower levels of #1 are quite intact - that's where we've seen the robot footage from. #3 is in a far worse state and little of it can be entered for mangled steel and concrete.
2 As and a B
Posts: 2590
Joined: 28 Nov 2008, 19:06

Post by 2 As and a B »

What, you mean not even a robot could get in :?: :!: :shock:

How about a lunar rover? That could cope with any terrain, and I'm sure it could be kitted out for the job within a couple of weeks. :wink:
I'm hippest, no really.
User avatar
PS_RalphW
Posts: 6978
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Cambridge

Post by PS_RalphW »

Probably easier to fit a camera and radiation sensors on the back of a rescue dog. Then shoot the dog.
2 As and a B
Posts: 2590
Joined: 28 Nov 2008, 19:06

Post by 2 As and a B »

A sniff movie!
I'm hippest, no really.
User avatar
JohnB
Posts: 6456
Joined: 22 May 2006, 17:42
Location: Beautiful sunny West Wales!

Post by JohnB »

RalphW wrote:Probably easier to fit a camera and radiation sensors on the back of a rescue dog. Then shoot the dog.
Better to fit it on AIC, and not an innocent dog :evil:.
John

Eco-Hamlets UK - Small sustainable neighbourhoods
User avatar
PS_RalphW
Posts: 6978
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 11:09
Location: Cambridge

Post by PS_RalphW »

Somehow I knew you wouldn't be keen on my suggestion, John. :wink:
Post Reply